![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bilge wrote:
Sure, it is. Scientists who are trying to determine whether or not the speed of light is constant, will certainly _not_ define it to be constant. Actually, no one would ever try to measure the velocity directly. There are a lot of things that depend on the speed of light being constant which offer a more precise result. The most direct measurement is probably from binary pulsar data. Since a non-constant speed of light implies that the photon mass is not zero and that charge isn't conserved, you have two more ways to check. brian a m stuckless |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NOMINATION: digest, volume 2453397 | Ross | Astronomy Misc | 233 | October 23rd 05 04:24 AM |
Geomagnetic field reason; A new theory | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 2 | July 22nd 05 08:12 AM |
Cosmic acceleration rediscovered | greywolf42 | Astronomy Misc | 258 | February 11th 05 01:21 PM |
Thanks George | Oriel36 | Astronomy Misc | 31 | January 5th 04 02:16 PM |
NASA Budget 1958 - 2003 in constant (1996) dollars | dave schneider | Policy | 1 | July 20th 03 08:16 AM |