![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I know that Griffin/NASA are going with an Inline SDV and a seperate
'Stick' launcher for the CEV. But, what would be the optimal Clean Sheet Design. The Goal is to return to the Moon and go to Mars and establish base(s) as quickly as possible: Could a scalable booster be designed to serve both functions? Or would you require seperate booster for each? Or would EOR/Assembly with a Saturn V class booster be a viable option for a Mars Mission? In either case would we be able to use exsisting engines or would we have to design new ones? Launch rates: With Mars, you pretty much stuck with one every 26 months The Moon 4-12 per year(Is that possible?) With 6 being the average. What are the bases for? Valid question: Mars - Purely scientific, research, search for life, geology(Areology?) Moon - there are several reasons for going back to the Moon(Geology,Radio & Optical Astronomy, insitu resource extraction/mining), one base can't satisfy all. Mining operations could interfere with the optics of your telescopes. So you might have to have several bases or a base with several human tended stations that could operate automously for several months between visits. What would be the min mass landed necessary to be able to start any of the activities right away? The big question is how much would this cost and how long would it take to develop it? (Sadly, most likely more than Congress is willing to pay) Just my $0.02 Space Cadet derwetzelsDASHspacecadetATyahooDOTcom Moon Society - St. Louis Chapter http://www.moonsociety.org/chapters/stlouis/ The Moon Society is a non-profit educational and scientific foundation formed to further scientific study and development of the moon. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NASA PDF - Apollo Experience Reports - 114 reports | Rusty | History | 1 | July 27th 05 03:52 AM |
Clean slate design question | David Ball | Space Shuttle | 0 | July 26th 05 07:08 AM |
Felxibility of Apollo design (was Space station future adrift (Soyuz purchase crisis) ) | Kieran A. Carroll | Policy | 32 | December 11th 04 06:36 AM |
Best possible design for Fluorite doublet APO? | ValeryD | Amateur Astronomy | 4 | November 25th 04 08:48 PM |
Pre-Columbia Criticism of NASA's Safety Culture in the late 1990's | Greg Kuperberg | Space Shuttle | 68 | September 18th 03 02:35 PM |