![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Back after the Columbia accident, there was talk here in the group that the
early foam used on the ET was better than the type of foam used on the Columbia ET and thereafter, because the new foam formula these days is worse because its manufacture had to be made with more environmentally friendly chemicals. ie. they aren't allowed to make a strong foam because of the chemicals and new environmental laws. Is this true or myth? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Columbia: A Secret Contingency Plan? | [email protected] | Space Shuttle | 21 | January 13th 04 07:37 PM |
STS-87 Foam Impact Assessment (reposted) | Stuf4 | Space Shuttle | 11 | September 29th 03 02:24 PM |
MEDS Created "Window of Vulnerability" Safety Risk | Stuf4 | Space Shuttle | 9 | September 27th 03 02:08 AM |
Was a second rate FOAM used in the shuttle???? | hank | Space Shuttle | 17 | September 14th 03 02:10 PM |
Dumb Question About Foam Test | Jon Berndt | Space Shuttle | 5 | July 30th 03 06:12 AM |