editing Wikipedia entry of Archimedes Plutonium's Atom Totality Theory

Today I decided to edit some of Wikipedia's page of Archimedes
Plutonium. Edit those very most egregious spots. But as I keep
mentioning, probably one of the most valuable lessons that Wikipedia is
giving to the world because of the Archimedes Plutonium entry is how so
many encyclopedia entries such as Encyc. Brittanica et al are riddled
by prejudice and subjectivity. Too many entries are exaggerated hero
worship and too many entries are not objective enough but subjective
and hatespamming.

--- quoting Wikipedia passage of AP's Atom Totality theory ---
In fact, most of Plutonium's Usenet postings on what he referred to
as science seemed to stem from his ability to draw unusual and
sometimes bizarre comparisons; for instance the similarity he claimed
to see between the entire universe and an atom (but this is hardly
original since [[Ray Cummings]] wrote his novel ''[[Girl in the Golden
Atom]]'' in [[1919]]), or the similarity between quantum tunneling and
the pouring of breakfast cereal from its box.
--- end quoting Wikipedia ---

This is the trouble when you have hatemongers or jokesters writing
encyclopedia sketches, for there is little room for reasoning and
rational clear thought. In my website of www.iw.net/~a_plutonium I
wrote in the Atom Totality theory section of a history of the idea of
the Atom Totality Theory. This idea has an amazingly rich history.
Democritus may have even had the idea of the Atom Universe as noted by
a British science historian, but it is obvious that Democritus could
never say a Plutonium Atom Totality for none of the Ancients knew of
the chemical elements from hydrogen to plutonium. Carl Sagan mentions a
nesting of "subatomic particles as Universes" and so the Sagan mention
conceives of the idea of a electron possessing an entire universe
inside the electron. But Sagan did not have the idea of an Atom
Totality because anyone who does or claims to that idea would have to
proffer or offer up what chemical element would the Atom Totality be.
So if Sagan had the idea of an Atom Totality is tantamount to saying
what chemical element it is. Is it a Lead Atom Totality or a Radon Atom
Totality or a Uranium Atom Totality. So obviously Carl Sagan never had
the idea of the Atom Totality. And to have the idea not only requires
what chemical element that it be, but also requires how the galaxies
and cosmic matter that we observe be reconciled with electron matter,
and for which I do by saying that the dots of the electron-dot-cloud
are galaxies and conforms to the special numbers in physics and
mathematics such as fine-structure-constant,(pi),(e), cosmic microwave
background radiation,etc etc.

So, pray tell, these hatemongers and or jokesters, where in the Ray
Cummings novel does he say what chemical element the Atom Totality is?
I welcome critics provided they have a modicum of science content, and
not just irrational hatemongering.

Archimedes Plutonium
30JUN05

---

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

wrote:
[...] one of the most valuable lessons that Wikipedia is
giving to the world [...] is how so
many encyclopedia entries such as Encyc. Brittanica et al are riddled
by prejudice and subjectivity.

Which is why it should NOT be used as a reference. Wikipedia would have
been a good idea 15 years ago, but now there are so many people who can
enter things for it to be usable. This includes mistakes,
misconceptions, "lack-of-conceptions", lunatic theories, etc. etc. etc.

--- Christopher Heckman

Have you ever studied Pragmatism, the philosophy of Pragmatism in that
knowledge is usage. And I use Wikipedia very often, especially when I
hunt for plant species. Wikipedia is my most often used encyclopedia.
Every book has errors in it. It comes down to which ones you use the
most often as a practical matter.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies