![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
MEDIA RELATIONS OFFICE
JET PROPULSION LABORATORY CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION PASADENA, CALIF. 91109 TELEPHONE (818) 354-5011 http://www.jpl.nasa.gov Whitney Clavin (818) 648-9734 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif. News release: 2005-088 May 31, 2005 NASA Telescope Catches Surprise Ultraviolet Light Show It was a day like any other for a nearby star named GJ 3685A - until it suddenly exploded with light. At 2 p.m. Pacific time on April 24, 2004, the detectors on NASA's Galaxy Evolution Explorer ultraviolet space telescope nearly overloaded when the star abruptly brightened by a factor of at least 10,000. After the excitement was over, astronomers realized that they had just recorded a giant star eruption, or flare, about one million times more energetic than those from our Sun. Findings on this intriguing event were presented today at the 206th meeting of the American Astronomical Society in Minneapolis, Minn. Movies based on images of the flare are available online at http://www.nasa.gov/centers/jpl/missions/galex.html and http://www.galex.caltech.edu/ . This dramatic flare is just one of many serendipitous discoveries made by the Galaxy Evolution Explorer since its 2003 launch. Though the telescope was originally designed to spot galaxies, it has repeatedly witnessed a sky flickering with ultraviolet flares, bursts and fast-moving streaks. While the flares and bursts are from different types of stars, the streaks are asteroids, satellites or possibly space debris floating across the telescope's field of view. The findings have led astronomers to conclude that the ultraviolet sky, once thought to be a quiet backdrop for viewing galaxies, is, in fact, a rather festive place. "We had no idea that the ultraviolet sky would be filled with so many things that go bump in the night," said Dr. Barry Welsh, University of California, Berkeley, co- discoverer of some of the flares. "All of these objects are a bonus to astronomers, since the observations come free when the telescope is aimed at distant galaxies." "I was surprised by how often we have observed stellar flares and by the amazing size of some of them," said Dr. Chris Martin, principal investigator of the Galaxy Evolution Explorer, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena. "Nature rarely disappoints us." So far, the Galaxy Evolution Explorer has recorded 84 bonus astrophysical events occurring on flaring stars, binary stars called dwarf novae, and pulsating stars, as well as countless pieces of space debris. These data are already being collected into public databases for other astronomers to study. For example, astronomers are using the new set of flare stars to test their flare theories. The Galaxy Evolution Explorer is surveying the entire sky at ultraviolet wavelengths for clues to how the earliest galaxies evolved into mature galaxies like our own Milky Way. To detect these early, faint galaxies, the telescope was outfitted with specialized cameras that allow the arrival of each photon of ultraviolet light to be timed with a precision of about a microsecond. "The telescope's detectors have provided an unprecedented time resolution of these astrophysical events," said Welsh. "Now, we can say what happens during each one-hundredth of a second of a flare event. That's better information than most video cameras have when they take slow motion shots of athletes." A preliminary analysis of the enormous flare witnessed by the Galaxy Evolution Explorer around GJ 3685A - the largest ever recorded in ultraviolet light - shows that the mechanisms underlying these stellar eruptions may be more complex than previously believed. Evidence for the two most popular flare theories was found. Flares are huge explosions of energy stemming from a single location on a star's surface. They happen regularly on many types of stars, though old, small "red dwarf" stars like GJ 3685A tend to experience them most frequently and dramatically. These stars, called flare stars, can erupt as often as every few hours, and with an intensity far greater than flares from our Sun. One of the reasons astronomers study flare stars is to gain a better picture and history of flare events taking place on the Sun. Caltech leads the Galaxy Evolution Explorer mission and is responsible for science operations and data analysis. NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif., manages the mission and built the science instrument. The mission was developed under NASA's Explorers Program managed by the Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md. South Korea and France are the international partners in the mission. For more information about the Galaxy Evolution Explorer, visit http://www.galex.caltech.edu/ . -end- |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"OW" == Ookie Wonderslug writes:
NASA Telescope Catches Surprise Ultraviolet Light Show It was a day like any other for a nearby star named GJ 3685A - until it suddenly exploded with light. At 2 p.m. Pacific time on April 24, 2004, the detectors on NASA's Galaxy Evolution Explorer ultraviolet space telescope nearly overloaded when the star abruptly brightened by a factor of at least 10,000. After the excitement was over, astronomers realized that they had just recorded a giant star eruption, or flare, about one million times more energetic than those from our Sun. OW If you go frame by frame and look very closely it appears that OW something struck that star just before the flare. There's a key line in the press release. Note that the detectors were "nearly overloaded." I suspect that what you are seeing is related to saturation or bleeding of the detectors. I know little about the detectors on GALEX, but certainly CCDs can suffer "bleeding" in which pixels near a bright pixel can themselves light up. -- Lt. Lazio, HTML police | e-mail: No means no, stop rape. | http://patriot.net/%7Ejlazio/ sci.astro FAQ at http://sciastro.astronomy.net/sci.astro.html |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 03 Jun 2005 11:18:18 -0400, Joseph Lazio
wrote: "OW" == Ookie Wonderslug writes: NASA Telescope Catches Surprise Ultraviolet Light Show It was a day like any other for a nearby star named GJ 3685A - until it suddenly exploded with light. At 2 p.m. Pacific time on April 24, 2004, the detectors on NASA's Galaxy Evolution Explorer ultraviolet space telescope nearly overloaded when the star abruptly brightened by a factor of at least 10,000. After the excitement was over, astronomers realized that they had just recorded a giant star eruption, or flare, about one million times more energetic than those from our Sun. OW If you go frame by frame and look very closely it appears that OW something struck that star just before the flare. There's a key line in the press release. Note that the detectors were "nearly overloaded." I suspect that what you are seeing is related to saturation or bleeding of the detectors. I know little about the detectors on GALEX, but certainly CCDs can suffer "bleeding" in which pixels near a bright pixel can themselves light up. That might be the case, but why would the object show up before the flare? How would it bleed through to previous frames? And the ring structure is not an artifact. I swear it looks like something wacked the life out of a large gas giant. Hit it so hard it completely disrupted it. It is illuminated by the flare. It's within a light day at least from the star. Someone needs to explain it. My guesses are just guesses and although there is a very slim chance I could be right, I doubt it. But still what would make a ring like that inside a stellar system? I don't know enough about the scope to know if it is just random noise of not, but it really does look like something hit that star and made it flare. The object is in the lower right side. You can see it on the 3 frames before the flare starts. It's a reddish color. Anyone else see it? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On a sunny day (Sat, 04 Jun 2005 03:16:45 GMT) it happened Ookie Wonderslug
wrote in : On 03 Jun 2005 11:18:18 -0400, Joseph Lazio wrote: "OW" == Ookie Wonderslug writes: NASA Telescope Catches Surprise Ultraviolet Light Show It was a day like any other for a nearby star named GJ 3685A - until it suddenly exploded with light. At 2 p.m. Pacific time on April 24, 2004, the detectors on NASA's Galaxy Evolution Explorer ultraviolet space telescope nearly overloaded when the star abruptly brightened by a factor of at least 10,000. After the excitement was over, astronomers realized that they had just recorded a giant star eruption, or flare, about one million times more energetic than those from our Sun. OW If you go frame by frame and look very closely it appears that OW something struck that star just before the flare. There's a key line in the press release. Note that the detectors were "nearly overloaded." I suspect that what you are seeing is related to saturation or bleeding of the detectors. I know little about the detectors on GALEX, but certainly CCDs can suffer "bleeding" in which pixels near a bright pixel can themselves light up. That might be the case, but why would the object show up before the flare? How would it bleed through to previous frames? And the ring structure is not an artifact. I swear it looks like something wacked the life out of a large gas giant. Hit it so hard it completely disrupted it. It is illuminated by the flare. It's within a light day at least from the star. Someone needs to explain it. My guesses are just guesses and although there is a very slim chance I could be right, I doubt it. But still what would make a ring like that inside a stellar system? I don't know enough about the scope to know if it is just random noise of not, but it really does look like something hit that star and made it flare. The object is in the lower right side. You can see it on the 3 frames before the flare starts. It's a reddish color. Anyone else see it? Could that big object(?) with the ring around it be a black hole? When gass is ejected by the exploding star, if falls in the black hole and lights up? If that thing rotates then it would form a ring? Probably wrong, it is a very evenly distributed ring. Maybe the dark object is much closer to us, and has some atmosphere that lights up because of backgound radiation from the exploding star? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Death Sentence for the Hubble? | MrPepper11 | Astronomy Misc | 422 | May 4th 05 03:56 PM |
Death Sentence for the Hubble? | MrPepper11 | Policy | 437 | May 4th 05 03:56 PM |
"Tired" light | Marcel Luttgens | Astronomy Misc | 107 | December 21st 04 07:20 AM |
UFO Activities from Biblical Times (LONG TEXT) | Kazmer Ujvarosy | SETI | 2 | December 25th 03 07:33 PM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | September 12th 03 01:37 AM |