![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Latest chapters in two verrry long stories. I still remain puzzled by the relationship, or lack thereof, between the space-based radar program Teets is talking about and the radar component of the NRO's Future Imagery Architecture. Teets, as D/NRO as well as acting secretary of the Air Force, presumably has had to address this matter. -------------------------------------------------- http://www.af.mil/news/story.asp?storyID=123010013 Teets tells Congress lasers-based communications coming by Staff Sgt. C. Todd Lopez Air Force Print News 3/11/2005 - WASHINGTON -- The military's senior adviser on space testified before Congress on March 8. Peter B. Teets, who serves as both the acting secretary of the Air Force and the Department of Defense's executive agent for space, spoke to the House Armed Services Committee subcommittee on strategic forces about the importance of programs like space radar and the transformational communications satellite. "I believe there is a strong need for us to provide persistent intelligence collection to combatant commanders day and night in all weather conditions," Mr. Teets said. "Only space radar can do that. In open areas and in denied areas, space radar can provide us with persistent intelligence collection." Providing that persistent intelligence to commanders in the field will require a constellation of satellites launched into space. Each satellite will use radar to take pictures of the earth, through any kind of weather, to provide both military and civilian intelligence communities information about what is happening on the ground and over the hill ahead, officials said. Mr. Teets said he recently directed the restructure of the Space Radar program, consolidating it in the Washington D.C. area, to create a tighter-knit community between the civilian and military agencies that will benefit from it. "We have restructured the space radar program in a way that will allow us to move forward in a team sense -- military community and intelligence community -- to use the same satellites to provide information for warfighting operations as well as for intelligence analysis," he said. "I think our restructured space radar program will indeed allow us to achieve those goals." One short term goal of the program is to demonstrate the capability of the system by launching a quarter-scale model satellite by 2008. The knowledge learned from that launch and from working with the satellite during its test phase will help the program develop larger operational systems, Mr. Teets said. "It will mature the technology," he said. "The transmitter/receiver we will use in the demo satellites will be used for the full operationally capable satellites as well. We will demonstrate that technology and demonstrate the cost of producing roughly a quarter-scale model spacecraft. We will have a high confidence then of what it will cost us to ultimately field the operationally responsive satellite." Mr. Teets said the department plans for the first space radar satellite to be launched in 2015. Also critical to the DOD space program is development of the Transformational Communications Satellite program. This program will create larger bandwidth for use by the DOD in both war and peace time. Bandwidth describes how much electronic information can be passed through a communications device at any time. More bandwidth means more information, and a greater capacity to serve more people at one time, Mr. Teets said. "The bandwidth we talk about is enormously important," he said. "We are going to be able to serve this communications on the move. We will have to service thousands of users simultaneously around the globe." New developments in communications include laser communications -- the exchange of information between two points on a beam of light. Mr. Teets told Congressmen the DOD had conducted a test of the concept in New Mexico. The experiment had been successful, he said, because it showed the possibility of laser communications between both space and a ground station and space and a flying aircraft. With the advent of transformational satellite program combined with laser communications, the Department of Defense will gain an enormous increase in bandwidth, Mr. Teets said. "Today our satellites are operating with higher bandwidth of about a factor of 10 than they were just a few years ago," he said. "We will get another factor of 10 when advanced extremely high frequency launches along with wide-band gap filler. And there is a third order of magnitude of bandwidth increase when we go to laser communications." That bandwidth will be used by Soldiers in the field to get the critical information they need to do their job and to stay ahead of the enemy, Mr. Teets said. "When somebody wants a map of the area in front of (him), that can be requested in a way that will have enough bandwidth capability to get that map to him in seconds," he said. While the satellite program is in development, DOD officials use commercially procured bandwidth to conduct some operations. Mr. Teets told lawmakers the services have agreed to come together to work on developing policy to define its use of that bandwidth. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Hmm. Apparently the SBR has experienced some slippage. One short term goal of the [space radar] program is to demonstrate the capability of the system by launching a quarter-scale model satellite by 2008. Mr. Teets said the department plans for the first space radar satellite to be launched in 2015. Compare that with http://www.losangeles.af.mil/smc/pa/fact_sheets/sbr.htm (Current as of June 2001) Technology maturation, risk reduction and concept development are essential elements of the SBR program strategy to reach initial operational capability (IOC) prior to the end of FY10. Investments in key technology areas are focused to mature technologies leading to component design and demonstration. Concept development activities will focus on reducing risk, integrating technologies, and demonstrating of a system level concept. Demonstrations as well as modeling and simulation will facilitate maximization of the operational capabilities of the SBR system. and http://www.afa.org/magazine/aug2002/0802radar.asp In February [2002], the Air Force-led Joint Program Office for SBR gave Congress a roadmap for the program. At the end of this month, a midterm report on an SBR analysis of alternatives will be presented to Air Force Undersecretary Peter B. Teets. If all goes as planned, Teets this fall will approve a program go-ahead. The service has penciled in an unofficial goal of awarding hardware contracts in Fiscal 2004-05, with a first satellite to be lofted about 2010. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() some slippage. and http://www.cdi.org/friendlyversion/p...umentID=1685#4 The Air Force is pressing ahead with its Space Based Radar (SBR) program, despite serious cuts to the system's proposed FY 2004 budget by Congress. The House recommended a reduction of $100 million, while the Senate thought $75 million should be taken out of the SBR's $271 million budget request. Both sides were worried about extreme cost growth (over 500 percent from last year) in the program's budget. However, Air Force undersecretary Peter Teets signed last month an acquisition memorandum approving the program's structure. Additionally, the Air Force has been pressing the Hill to authorize the full funding request of $4.4 billion through FY 2009. The SBR is envisioned to be composed of satellites in Low Earth or Medium Earth Orbit which would generate Synthetic Aperture Radar and Digital Terrain Elevation Data, as well as Ground Moving Target Indicator (GMTI). Two or three contractors are to be picked next year for risk reduction work, with the goal of launching the first SBR in 2012. (Defense Daily, Aug. 27, 2003 ) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Allen Thomson,
You and your interesting topic must be on the same taboo/nondisclosure banishment list as myself. You seem to be thinking either a little too far outside of their mainstream status quo box or, into topics of whatever's 'nondisclosure', such as I've discovered whenever I've suggested utilizing our existing 0.5 milliradian ABL of 100 MW class laser cannon (somewhat modified from IR to perhaps 450 nm) for interplanetary communications. If nothing else, it seems our growing fleet of ABLs should be capable of starting our first 'War of the Worlds' faster than our resident warlord(GW Bush) can point out another oily rock hiding that first WMD, or perhaps even Osama bin Laden. I've even suggested having those relatively small and energy efficient radar image receiving apertures situated upon the moon, in as mush as such would have been providing 10 mm/pixel and possibly even as good as 16 bits/pixel look-see at the likes of Venus and Mars, 100 mm/pixel and 8 bits/pixel of the likes of Saturn and of that nifty Titan moon, not to mention absolutely terrific NEO spotting and tracking capability. It seems that my LSE-CM/ISS and of it's dipole element deployment of a dozen or so 100 GW laser cannons to within 50,000 km of mother Earth isn't what their doctor ordered either. Thus for the likes of radar or better yet being of a near-UV or even IR spectrum data throughput as focused to a relatively small spot or target zone is absolutely terrific, especially if that were of the near-UV or into the UV/a spectrum, as per say that's not going to fry your butt, just slicing through a few strands of your DNA, of which a good dosage of steroids or banked bone marrow should eliminate most of the negative affects. Actually, if it's not too terribly clouded, a fairly small amount of laser energy is necessary as long as the GPS tracking is good and if need be you could keep yourself out of the satellite sights until the download is finished, of which that process shouldn't exceed but a millisecond if that beam were utilizing a quantum/FM binary packet bullet mode of data transfer. How many GBPS are they thinking of? Basic township that's situated upon Venus: http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town.htm Basic LSE (Lunar Space Elevator) http://guthvenus.tripod.com/lunar-space-elevator.htm Other available topics by; Brad Guth / GASA-IEIS http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-topics.htm |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Apparently there has been, or will be, a Grand Unification. Space Radar will be the single space radar effort for the nation, and provide the deep look, all-weather, day and night surveillance and reconnaissance capabilities required by both the IC [Intelligence Community] and joint warfighters. Or maybe not, or not quite. Note the "propose" below. One remembers that the DOD Space Radar, in several previous manifestations, has been proposed for unification with the NRO's future radarsats. http://i-newswire.com/pr12223.html Teets: Air Force's biggest challenge is recapitalizing the fleet (2005-03-27) by Staff Sgt. C. Todd Lopez Air Force Print News WASHINGTON -- During a roundtable discussion at the Pentagon March 22, the acting secretary of the Air Force discussed space, the F/A-22 Raptor and business ethics. [snip] The space radar program has suffered scrutiny on Capitol Hill, but Mr. Teets said he has responded to that scrutiny with positive actions to streamline the program and move it forward. "One of the things we have done this year for the space radar system is propose that we have a national radar collection system that will serve both the needs of the (Central Intelligence Agency) and the Department of Defense," he said. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Apparently there has been, or will be, a Grand Unification. [snip] Or maybe not, or not quite. Or maybe so. It will be interesting to see if Mr. Negroponte weighs in on this and similar NROish issues. Perfect Harmony? by Amy Butler Aviation Week & Space Technology April 4, 2005 pp. 51-54 [EXCERPT from p. 54] Better collaboration between the NRO and Air Force is producing the first "dual-use" system for the military and intelligence communities in the Space Radar program, Teets says. Rumsfeld and Porter Goss, the director of the Central Intelligence Agency, have signed a joint memo designating Space Radar as the only system of its kind for the country. "I don't think there is a single satellite right now that is truly dual use," Teets says. "I think this is breaking new ground. I really do." Officials are planning a 2008 demonstration with two one-quarter-scale satellites. The first full- scale Space Radar satellite would launch in 2015. The constellation would use synthetic aperture radar to collect images through clouds and dust for the intelligence community and provide near-real-time data on moving ground targets like convoys for the military. It is with this collaboration that [Teets' national security space adviser Maj. Gen. Robert] Kehler says the integration staff can help to make the most of the government dollar. "Left to its own devices, I think that perhaps we could have had a situation where the NRO pursued a Space Radar system and the Air Force pursued a Space Radar system for different purposes," Teets says. "The NRO has operated as a national agency collecting national intelligence. I think it has only been recently that we've started to really find ways to get intelligence collected by NRO assets into the hands of warfighters direct. I think for a long time it was a huge struggle to get nationally collected information into the hands of the warfighter." Among the earlier roadblocks were security classifications and the technical complexity of linking various collection and dissemination systems. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
National Space Policy: NSDD-42 (issued on July 4th, 1982) | Stuf4 | History | 158 | December 13th 14 09:50 PM |
Pravda: Space cooperation with the USA to ruin Russia's space industry | Jim Oberg | Space Station | 4 | February 14th 05 05:08 AM |
Space Access Update #102 2/9/04 | Henry Vanderbilt | Policy | 1 | February 10th 04 03:18 PM |
International Space Station Science - One of NASA's rising stars | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | December 27th 03 01:32 PM |
Electric Gravity&Instantaneous Light | ralph sansbury | Astronomy Misc | 8 | August 31st 03 02:53 AM |