231Pu Atom Totality Universe is a dodecahedron? The 5f6 is adodecahedron??

--- quoting the Economist ---
The shape of the universe

Platonic truths
Oct 9th 2003
From The Economist print edition


Data from an American satellite suggest that
the universe is a dodecahedron

THERE are five Platonic solids of perfect
symmetry. Three, the tetrahedron, octahedron and icosahedron,
have triangular faces. A fourth, the cube, has
square faces. The fifth, the dodecahedron, has pentagonal
faces. Plato believed that the first four
corresponded to the elements of which the Greeks thought the
material world was composed: fire, air, water
and earth. The dodecahedron, however, corresponded to
quintessence, the element of the heavens. As
Plato put it, “God used this solid for the whole universe,
embroidering figures on it.” And if the
arguments of a paper in this week's Nature stand up, Plato will
have been proved right. For Jean-Pierre
Luminet, of the Paris Observatory, and his colleagues believe
that the universe is, indeed, a dodecahedron.

They base their argument on data collected by
the
Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP).
This
American satellite has been examining the
microwave
radiation generated shortly after the universe
began.
The wavelength of this radiation is remarkably
pure, but
like a musical note it has harmonics associated
with it.
These harmonics, like those of a note, reflect
the shape
of the object in which the waves were
generated. In the
case of the note, that object is a musical
instrument. In
the case of the microwave background, that
object is the
universe itself.

The most widely accepted model of the universe
suggests that it is both flat and infinite. In
this case,
flatness does not mean it is two-dimensional,
but that
the space of which it is composed has no
large-scale
curves in it. (Small curves induced by
gravitational fields,
and predicted by the theory of relativity, do
exist.)
WMAP's data are in close agreement with this
model, but
that agreement is not perfect. In particular,
the second
and third harmonics of the microwave radiation
are
weaker than expected. Dr Luminet's calculations
suggest
that this weakness can be explained if the
universe is
finite and dodecahedron-shaped. Of course,
things are
not quite that simple. Familiar dodecahedrons
have an
inside and an outside. What Dr Luminet is
proposing is
actually something called a dodecahedral space,
first
described by his countryman Jules-Henri
Poincaré in the
19th century. Such a space has no boundary,
even
though it has a finite volume. But it is,
quintessentially,
a dodecahedron. One up to the Greeks.
--- end quoting the Economist ---

I do not know how I missed this report of a Cosmic dodecahedron. Today I
read this subject is a contested issue. And it is good that the magazine
ECONOMIST has progressive science.

But I am not too surprized that the microwave background radiation would
eventually steer away from the fake theories of Big Bang and end up
supporting and validating the true theory of Atom Totality. You see, the
cosmos cannot be a dodecahedron in the Big Bang. But the Cosmos is a
structure in the Atom Totality theory and the 5f6 is what this microwave
radiation is uncovering.

Now I have many textbooks showing pictures of what the 5f6 electron dot
pattern looks like. The book THE ELEMENTS BEYOND URANIUM by Seaborg and
Loveland on page 73 shows the 5f6 in a dodecahedron pattern.

On the Internet during the 1990s I often posted with a picture of the
5f6 as my signature block, and perhaps I should reinstate that picture
into my signature block.


94th ELECTRON OF 231PU
Very crude dot picture of 5f6, 94TH ELECTRON


::\ ::|:: /::
::\::|::/::
_ _
(:Y
- -
::/::|::\::
::/ ::|:: \::

One of those dots is the Milky Way galaxy. The electron cloud
dot picture is a picture of the night sky of galaxies.
Look in a chemistry textbook or quantum physics textbook of the
electron cloud dot picture.

Of course I could only show 6 plane faces of the 12 plane faces of a
dodecahedron.

And my old front page of my old website www.archimedesplutonium.com had
a huge picture of the 5f6 showing its 6 plane faces.

This is great news. In the early years of 2000s was great news from
Johns Hopkins Univ that the color of the Universe is a silver gray color
matching the color of what the chemical element plutonium is. A silver
gray color.

Now we have news of the Microwave Radiation displaying a Cosmic
Structure with the pattern of a dodecahedron.

So I wonder if the scientists of Johns Hopkins and the scientists of the
team in France of Dr Luminet can join together the color of the
Universe with the shape of the Universe and declare that only the
chemical element of Plutonium fits the description.

Of course in year 1990 I saw that 231Pu explains the Inverse Fine
Structure Constant as 137 neutrons and that only plutonium explains why
pi is approx 22/7 and e is approx 19/7 because Pu has 22 subshells in 7
shells where only 19 subshells are occupied.

So as time goes on, these Cosmic color and Cosmic structure pattern will
not go away but become even more refined. What will disappear and be
trashcanned is fake theory of Big Bang and black-holes and other present
day exotica and fakery.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots
of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

In article , says...
::\ ::|:: /::
::\::|::/::
_ _
(:Y
- -
::/::|::\::
::/ ::|:: \::

One of those dots is the Milky Way galaxy.

Which one?

--
ICQ 40628243 Tel 07092057581 Fax 07092308800

Are you perchance affiliated with the Time Cube?

http://timecube.com/


"Archimedes Plutonium" wrote in message
...



--- quoting the Economist ---
The shape of the universe

Platonic truths
Oct 9th 2003
From The Economist print edition


Data from an American satellite suggest that
the universe is a dodecahedron

THERE are five Platonic solids of perfect
symmetry. Three, the tetrahedron, octahedron and icosahedron,
have triangular faces. A fourth, the cube, has
square faces. The fifth, the dodecahedron, has pentagonal
faces. Plato believed that the first four
corresponded to the elements of which the Greeks thought the
material world was composed: fire, air, water
and earth. The dodecahedron, however, corresponded to
quintessence, the element of the heavens. As
Plato put it, "God used this solid for the whole universe,
embroidering figures on it." And if the
arguments of a paper in this week's Nature stand up, Plato will
have been proved right. For Jean-Pierre
Luminet, of the Paris Observatory, and his colleagues believe
that the universe is, indeed, a dodecahedron.

They base their argument on data collected by
the
Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP).
This
American satellite has been examining the
microwave
radiation generated shortly after the universe
began.
The wavelength of this radiation is remarkably
pure, but
like a musical note it has harmonics associated
with it.
These harmonics, like those of a note, reflect
the shape
of the object in which the waves were
generated. In the
case of the note, that object is a musical
instrument. In
the case of the microwave background, that
object is the
universe itself.

The most widely accepted model of the universe
suggests that it is both flat and infinite. In
this case,
flatness does not mean it is two-dimensional,
but that
the space of which it is composed has no
large-scale
curves in it. (Small curves induced by
gravitational fields,
and predicted by the theory of relativity, do
exist.)
WMAP's data are in close agreement with this
model, but
that agreement is not perfect. In particular,
the second
and third harmonics of the microwave radiation
are
weaker than expected. Dr Luminet's calculations
suggest
that this weakness can be explained if the
universe is
finite and dodecahedron-shaped. Of course,
things are
not quite that simple. Familiar dodecahedrons
have an
inside and an outside. What Dr Luminet is
proposing is
actually something called a dodecahedral space,
first
described by his countryman Jules-Henri
Poincaré in the
19th century. Such a space has no boundary,
even
though it has a finite volume. But it is,
quintessentially,
a dodecahedron. One up to the Greeks.
--- end quoting the Economist ---

I do not know how I missed this report of a Cosmic dodecahedron. Today I
read this subject is a contested issue. And it is good that the magazine
ECONOMIST has progressive science.

But I am not too surprized that the microwave background radiation would
eventually steer away from the fake theories of Big Bang and end up
supporting and validating the true theory of Atom Totality. You see, the
cosmos cannot be a dodecahedron in the Big Bang. But the Cosmos is a
structure in the Atom Totality theory and the 5f6 is what this microwave
radiation is uncovering.

Now I have many textbooks showing pictures of what the 5f6 electron dot
pattern looks like. The book THE ELEMENTS BEYOND URANIUM by Seaborg and
Loveland on page 73 shows the 5f6 in a dodecahedron pattern.

On the Internet during the 1990s I often posted with a picture of the
5f6 as my signature block, and perhaps I should reinstate that picture
into my signature block.


94th ELECTRON OF 231PU
Very crude dot picture of 5f6, 94TH ELECTRON


::\ ::|:: /::
::\::|::/::
_ _
(:Y
- -
::/::|::\::
::/ ::|:: \::

One of those dots is the Milky Way galaxy. The electron cloud
dot picture is a picture of the night sky of galaxies.
Look in a chemistry textbook or quantum physics textbook of the
electron cloud dot picture.

Of course I could only show 6 plane faces of the 12 plane faces of a
dodecahedron.

And my old front page of my old website www.archimedesplutonium.com had
a huge picture of the 5f6 showing its 6 plane faces.

This is great news. In the early years of 2000s was great news from
Johns Hopkins Univ that the color of the Universe is a silver gray color
matching the color of what the chemical element plutonium is. A silver
gray color.

Now we have news of the Microwave Radiation displaying a Cosmic
Structure with the pattern of a dodecahedron.

So I wonder if the scientists of Johns Hopkins and the scientists of the
team in France of Dr Luminet can join together the color of the
Universe with the shape of the Universe and declare that only the
chemical element of Plutonium fits the description.

Of course in year 1990 I saw that 231Pu explains the Inverse Fine
Structure Constant as 137 neutrons and that only plutonium explains why
pi is approx 22/7 and e is approx 19/7 because Pu has 22 subshells in 7
shells where only 19 subshells are occupied.

So as time goes on, these Cosmic color and Cosmic structure pattern will
not go away but become even more refined. What will disappear and be
trashcanned is fake theory of Big Bang and black-holes and other present
day exotica and fakery.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots
of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

Sun, 10 Apr 2005 13:18:48 -0500 Archimedes Plutonium wrote:


94th ELECTRON OF 231PU
Very crude dot picture of 5f6, 94TH ELECTRON

::\ ::|:: /::
::\::|::/::
_ _
(:Y
- -
::/::|::\::
::/ ::|:: \::

One of those dots is the Milky Way galaxy. The electron cloud
dot picture is a picture of the night sky of galaxies.
Look in a chemistry textbook or quantum physics textbook of the
electron cloud dot picture.


Dr. Luminet and his team of colleagues have found evidence from Microwave
Background Radiation that the Universe has an overall structure in the form
of a dodecahedron.

What I suggest is that the recent news of galaxies accelerating suggesting
"antigravity" force as seen by their Cepheid variable stars was all an
misinterpretation. That these galaxies were not accelerating but were
observed in the highly bent space of the lobes of the 5f6. So that what
appeared as accelerating galaxies was just due to the fact that they are in
the outline of the dodecahedron which is the lobes of the 5f6.

So if the Luminet team of researchers joined together with the Cepheid
variable star observer teams we may be able to trace out the Cosmic
Dodecahedron which is the 5f6 lobes of 231Pu.

So it is not the case of galaxies accelerating and antigravity but rather
these galaxies are in a curved lobes of the 5f6.

And in an Atom Totality, unlike the Big Bang theory where the center of the
cosmos is everywhere, in an Atom Totality our Milky Way Galaxy is not the
center of the Cosmos but is in a particular differentiated cosmic spot. In
the Big Bang theory every spot is the center of the Cosmos but in an Atom
Totality theory, every spot is a unique and different point with respect to
the Nucleus of the Atom Totality.

So I think the Cosmic Background Microwave Radiation studies should be
allied with the Cepheid Variable Stars observations to gain insight of
details of the cosmic dodecahedron which is really the 5f6 lobes of 231Pu.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots
of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

So the trouble with the Big Bang theory is that it sees galaxies with Cepheid
variable stars as accelerating and causing antigravity and an Accelerated
Expansion in the Big Bang. Whereas the Atom Totality theory sees these
galaxies and Cepheid variable stars as merely normal stars that are in the
highly bent region of the 5f6 lobes of a Plutonium Atom Totality. There is no
acceleration, and there is no antigravity.

So where Dr. Luminet and his team of researchers in France see the Universe as
a Cosmic dodecahedron from the Microwave Background Radiation, they are seeing
the lobes of the 5f6 of the Plutonium Atom Totality. They see the 5f6 lobes as
a dodecahedron.

But if the Luminet team were to combine the two observations of Microwave
Background Radiation coupled with Cepheid Variable Stars which would put
specific localized regions of the lobes of the 5f6.

So when you couple Microwave Background Radiation with Cepheid Variable Stars
we can better pinpoint where Earth is located in the 5f6 and where the Nucleus
of the Atom Totality is located. We can pinpoint the curvature of the lobes
and how far distant Earth is from the Nucleus of the Atom Totality.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots
of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

Wed, 13 Apr 2005 21:57:34 -0500 Oscar Lanzi III wrote:

I suppose that I might find AP's theories a little eaier to understand
if I knew what was meant by a "5f6" orbital. I always thought that was
a subshell configuration. Of course I (along with all those textbooks
and standard conventions) could be wrong and AP right.

There is an f_(z^3) orbital whose maximum-density areas do, true enough,
pass through the face centers of a regular dodecahedron (or, if one
prefers, the vertices of a regular icosahedron). But it's shaped more
like a child's top than like a dodecahedon. To speak as if there were a
discrete lobe pointing to each of the 12 face centers is inaccurate.
f_(z^3) actually has two lobes pointing to a pair of opposite faces; the
remainder of the orbital consists of rings whose "latitudes" match those
of the remaining face centers.

--OL


I guess I should remove you out of my killfile. If you look at page 73 in
The Elements Beyond Uranium by Seaborg and Loveland, 1990 Wiley you will
see the Cubic Set solution for the f orbital of plutonium. In the far right
column when you combine those lobes into one 3 dimensional model gives 12
lobes corresponding to the 12 faces of a dodecahedron. If I remember
correctly the d orbitals are not rich enough to form a dodecahedron, and of
course not the s and p.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots
of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies