![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Has anybody here heard about this yet? What could of caused this, they
look like headlights to me. Maybe there was another airplane far in the distance? Video can be seen he http://www.thesandiegochannel.com/ne...42/detail.html Mexican Air Force Pilots Film 11 UFOs (AP Video) A videotape made widely available to the news media on Tuesday shows the bright objects, some sharp points of light and others like large headlights, moving rapidly in what appears to be a late-evening sky. The lights were filmed on March 5 by pilots using infrared equipment. They appeared to be flying at an altitude of about 3,500 meters (11,480 feet), and allegedly surrounded the Air Force jet as it conducted routine anti-drug trafficking vigilance in Campeche. Only three of the objects showed up on the plane's radar. "Was I afraid? Yes. A little afraid because we were facing something that had never happened before," said radar operator Lt. German Marin in a taped interview made public Tuesday. "I couldn't say what it was ... but I think they're completely real," added Lt. Mario Adrian Vazquez, the infrared equipment operator. Vazquez insisted that there was no way to alter the recorded images. The plane's captain, Maj. Magdaleno Castanon, said the military jets chased the lights "and I believe they could feel we were pursuing them." When the jets stopped following the objects, they disappeared, he said. A Defense Department spokesman confirmed Tuesday that the videotape was filmed by members of the Mexican Air Force. The spokesman declined to comment further and spoke on customary condition of anonymity. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Michael Shaffer" wrote in message
news:uvBoc.44484$Z%5.36717@okepread01... Has anybody here heard about this yet? What could of caused this, they look like headlights to me. Maybe there was another airplane far in the distance? Video can be seen he http://www.thesandiegochannel.com/ne...42/detail.html Try asking in alt.ufo or similar. -- Alan Erskine We can get people to the Moon in five years, not the fifteen GWB proposes. Give NASA a real challenge |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was looking for a real scientific explanation since I don't believe in
ufos Alan Erskine wrote: "Michael Shaffer" wrote in message news:uvBoc.44484$Z%5.36717@okepread01... Has anybody here heard about this yet? What could of caused this, they look like headlights to me. Maybe there was another airplane far in the distance? Video can be seen he http://www.thesandiegochannel.com/ne...42/detail.html Try asking in alt.ufo or similar. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well not seen it, but you need to examine the weather conditions very
carefully. Troposphere ducting can affect visible light, even to the extent of putting lines of queuing traffic in the sky, personally, I'd only believe I'd had a close encounter if I shook the tentacle of the visitor! Brian -- Brian Gaff....Note, this account does not accept Bcc: email. graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them Email: __________________________________________________ __________________________ __________________________________ "Michael Shaffer" wrote in message news:uvBoc.44484$Z%5.36717@okepread01... Has anybody here heard about this yet? What could of caused this, they look like headlights to me. Maybe there was another airplane far in the distance? Video can be seen he http://www.thesandiegochannel.com/ne...42/detail.html Mexican Air Force Pilots Film 11 UFOs (AP Video) A videotape made widely available to the news media on Tuesday shows the bright objects, some sharp points of light and others like large headlights, moving rapidly in what appears to be a late-evening sky. The lights were filmed on March 5 by pilots using infrared equipment. They appeared to be flying at an altitude of about 3,500 meters (11,480 feet), and allegedly surrounded the Air Force jet as it conducted routine anti-drug trafficking vigilance in Campeche. Only three of the objects showed up on the plane's radar. "Was I afraid? Yes. A little afraid because we were facing something that had never happened before," said radar operator Lt. German Marin in a taped interview made public Tuesday. "I couldn't say what it was ... but I think they're completely real," added Lt. Mario Adrian Vazquez, the infrared equipment operator. Vazquez insisted that there was no way to alter the recorded images. The plane's captain, Maj. Magdaleno Castanon, said the military jets chased the lights "and I believe they could feel we were pursuing them." When the jets stopped following the objects, they disappeared, he said. A Defense Department spokesman confirmed Tuesday that the videotape was filmed by members of the Mexican Air Force. The spokesman declined to comment further and spoke on customary condition of anonymity. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.681 / Virus Database: 443 - Release Date: 10/05/2004 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michael Shaffer" wrote in message news:UTGoc.46710$Z%5.8022@okepread01... I was looking for a real scientific explanation since I don't believe in ufos How can you say that? UFOs are reported frequently and their presence is verified. What hasn't happened is changing the UFO (Unidentified Flying Object) to an FOIAAAS (Flying Object Identified As An Alien Spacecraft) Mike Walsh |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Michael Shaffer" wrote in message
news:UTGoc.46710$Z%5.8022@okepread01... I was looking for a real scientific explanation since I don't believe in ufos Oh, but UFO's do exist! By the very definition, UFO means an object that is flying that has not been identified. For instance, when you see a trail of 'smoke' in the sky, it's _probably_ an aircraft creating contrails (condensation caused by compression of atmospheric moisture which then freezes in the cold air), but if you can't see the aircraft, then the object is technically unidentified. -- Alan Erskine We can get people to the Moon in five years, not the fifteen GWB proposes. Give NASA a real challenge |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Michael Shaffer" wrote in message
news:UTGoc.46710$Z%5.8022@okepread01... I was looking for a real scientific explanation since I don't believe in ufos Hmmm... You're part of a religion that doesn't believe in UFO, eh? Anyway. Explanation? That depends, since that there're textbook 'science' textbook, then there're REAL 'science'. But I'm sure that you mean textbook 'science'. As for looking like headlights. Maybe someone don't want to see the silhouette of the crafts and then flashes light at the observer? "Mike Walsh" wrote in message ... How can you say that? UFOs are reported frequently and their presence is verified. Correct. The definition of UFO is actually quite general, like if your neighboor is flying a kite and you can't recognise what it is, it too can be consider as an UFO. And if people see two aircrafts crashing into two towers and people don't know what they're, those can be consider as UFOs too. And if there's a third object that zipped out of the area in high speed after the previous two crashed, it too can be consider as an UFO. And if people saw a huge fireball disintegrating over Texas and don't know what it is, it too can be consider as UFO. Of course, the definition of UFO has been narrowed down that one scientist refused to apply the term UFO for something (a natural phenomena I think) that had happened and instead insist of using the term "anomaly". The terms of "UFO" and "aliens" are surely used in a narrow definition these days, like the word below: http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=aryan It's amazing that none of its originial meanings are 'No longer in technical use', which make one wonder if someone seems to be always kept changing the definition of words. What hasn't happened is changing the UFO (Unidentified Flying Object) to an FOIAAAS (Flying Object Identified As An Alien Spacecraft) What make one so sure that it's an alien spacecraft? And what make people so sure that it had people in it? There are several things to be define if an object is determined to be a craft and not clearly homo sapien made craft: - Manned (loosely speaking) or unmanned. - Homo sapien (Adamic if you're a biblical person) made or not. - Homo sapien piloted or not. - Orbit capable or not. - Interplanetary travel capable or not. - Interstellar travel capable or not. - Dimensional shift capable or not. - Place of manufacture. - Current place of storage. - Date when manufacture start, date when manufacture end. And so on... As for what happened to the Mexican Air Force pilot. He saw bright objects in the night sky, as fast as his aircrafts or maybe even faster and they run each time he followed them. Big deal, so what? Will it receieves so much attention if he saw a flock of geese flying instead? Will it make someone said "I was looking for a real scientific explanation, since I don't believe in geese"? Will it make someone said "I'd only believe I'd had a close encounter if I shook the feather of the avian"? Mike Walsh |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stealth American Aircraft.
Bendiho Americanos. "Alan Erskine" wrote in message ... "Michael Shaffer" wrote in message news:uvBoc.44484$Z%5.36717@okepread01... Has anybody here heard about this yet? What could of caused this, they look like headlights to me. Maybe there was another airplane far in the distance? Video can be seen he http://www.thesandiegochannel.com/ne...42/detail.html Try asking in alt.ufo or similar. -- Alan Erskine We can get people to the Moon in five years, not the fifteen GWB proposes. Give NASA a real challenge |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Joseph S. Powell, III" ... Stealth American Aircraft. Bendiho Americanos. Yeah...the idea crossed my mind. I figure violating Mex airspace is not a big deal on the broad scale of things. I got a kick out of the report that said the object was "invisible" but showed up on the IR camera. Shoot, you could say the same thing about any aircraft at night on an infra-red viewer. The larger mystery is why the Mex mil turned over the tape to a UFO quack for an opinion. His opinion was that the mil would not have turned over the tape unless it were real.....is that circular reasoning? The general down there was cool....he said hey, we just turned over the tape, the opinion is his, not ours. Yeesh. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Noose Tightens | Chuck Stewart | Space Shuttle | 14 | September 11th 03 11:51 AM |
Fundamental Film Facts (51-L, 1/20/89) | John Maxson | Space Shuttle | 10 | August 8th 03 05:04 AM |