![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At least according to this:
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...e_050228120654 Personally, I'm all for it. Competition is good for space programs. I didn't know India had any thoughts of going into space. Not really the country I'd pick as most likely to go to the Moon. Rick Alger -~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~ Webcomics / cartoons: http://community-2.webtv.net/daikaij...artoonCarnival ~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~- Original net fiction: http://community-2.webtv.net/inkorama/RicksStorytime/ ~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~- Science fiction links for WebTV users: http://community-2.webtv.net/inkorama/SciFiLinks/ -~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Richard Alger" wrote in message
... At least according to this: http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...e_050228120654 Personally, I'm all for it. Competition is good for space programs. I didn't know India had any thoughts of going into space. Not really the country I'd pick as most likely to go to the Moon. India's been launchin satellites since the early '70's; as for going to the moon, that's new. -- Alan Erskine We can get people to the Moon in five years, not the fifteen GWB proposes. Give NASA a real challenge |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Richard Alger" wrote in message ... At least according to this: http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...e_050228120654 Personally, I'm all for it. Competition is good for space programs. I didn't know India had any thoughts of going into space. Not really the country I'd pick as most likely to go to the Moon. Launching satellites toward the Moon is no big deal. And China's dream of a manned Moon base is more than 20 years away which is so far into the future (politically speaking) that it might as well have been 100 years. I personally think it's just a whiff of hot air, nothing more. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hm, US envisioned moon landing is circa 20 years away too, so is that
just a whiff of hot air ? -kert |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"kert" wrote ...
Hm, US envisioned moon landing is circa 20 years away too, so is that just a whiff of hot air ? I'd give even odds of no manned moon landing within 30 years. Of course that's just an uninformed guess. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .com,
kert wrote: Hm, US envisioned moon landing is circa 20 years away too, so is that just a whiff of hot air ? Basically, yes. Work toward a shuttle replacement is the *only* part of the glorious Twenty-Year Plan which happens while Bush is still in power, so it's the only part that is likely to happen as planned. Almost certainly, the later phases will at least be changed by his successors. Even the shuttle replacement is by no means assured. To have some assurance that it would actually happen, the schedule would need to be rather tighter, so that real momentum has built up by the time the White House changes hands. (Although one cynic has suggested that if we consider history, the key step is to assassinate Bush. :-)) -- "Think outside the box -- the box isn't our friend." | Henry Spencer -- George Herbert | |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Competition is never good, humans do lousy when they are told to
compete. On other hand, humans are quite good when they are reaching for a goal. So... set a goal, but don't compete. The X-Prize was won not because competition, but because Paul Allen gave Scaled Composites a money that is TWICE the price money, and who knows what else that Scaled Composites recieved. If Omni Consumer Products or Weyland Yutani and so on sponsored Scaled Composites, would it still fair to compete? Tier One (White Knight and SpaceShip One) came into existence because Scaled Composites have a goal and the resources, not because of competition. As for India. The people of India is actually quite clever people. As for India going to the Moon. Have the current government clear the Moon's immigration yet? Since it's obviously that the current U.S.A., Russia, and China governments aren't able to clear immigration. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Joann Evans wrote:
wrote: As for India going to the Moon. Have the current government clear the Moon's immigration yet? Since it's obviously that the current U.S.A., Russia, and China governments aren't able to clear immigration. What's your point? None of those (or any other) countries have Customs Agents or a Border Patrol on the Moon, last I heard.... What do you think happens to the chances of the next supply ship reaching you if US decides that you are illegaly on moon, in possession of technology that should not be in the hands of individuals and of multiple terrorist uses? -- Sander +++ Out of cheese error +++ |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Alger,
I believe that you're exactly correct, and in more freaking ways than even the two of us can count. India is just as capable and just as entitled to the vast riches of the moon as per warlord GW Bush and his ENRON borgs. Although, I believe that China and/or possibly China/Russia are going to make this one into a real knock-down drag-out run for the money quest of all times, and for a perfectly good reason at that. By eventually having the LSE-CM/ISS established on the near-side is the total win-win answer as to dozens of technical as well as profit related issues, not to mention the ultimate star-wars solution that'll kick and/or fry serious butts just about anywhere back here on Earth, and/or otherwise help to defend mother Earth from NEOs by focusing those dozen or so 100 GW laser cannons upon whatever's headed our way. The moon and of the ME-L1 mutual gravity-well or tidal nullification zone is entirely up for grabs, and it's entirely a first come first served basis, as in finders keepers and thereby becoming the spacelord over whomever is operating whatever should become the LSE-CM/ISS and of everything other that's associated. Unfortunately, and unlike the ESE fiasco, there can be only one such gravity-well based 'Lunar Space Elevator', however many levels of what's directly below the ME-L1.1 (that's roughly 64,000 km off the lunar deck) and of whatever's between that CM/ISS and along the tether dipole element and certainly of it's termination platform that's reaching to within 50,000 km of mother Earth (much closer if you'd dare, as it's certainly technically possible to safely cruise the fully interactive star-wars and energy transferring laser cannon loaded platform to within 1,000 km, which would still avoid the vast majority of existing and proposed future satellites) is what counts. Unlike the ESE fiasco that's little more than the usual dog-wagging spendy pie in the sky, as well as for remaining as nearly undefendable, did I mention those multiple 100 GW laser cannons which could vaporise any stinking satellite or any other natural substance coming anywhere near the LSE and dipole tethers, within that of an AI/robotic auto-defend split second. Of course, any one of those available 100 GW laser cannons could accidently vaporise our WhiteHouse (preferably with GW Bush inside while on a live televised feed) much like we'd accidently used one of our best GPS guided and otherwise fully interactively controlled cruise-missile as to take out a Chinese embassy, or even that of our Boeing/TRW ABL (Phantom Works) to target track and even thermal energy-transfer practice upon a returning shuttle (gee whiz, what could possibly go wrong with any of that?). Once the lunar based basalt processing is in full swing, then eventually other centrifugal based LSEs can be efficiently accommodated and safely coexist, such as for the back-side (EM-L2) should become extremely interesting for astronomy/science and for interplanetary considerations, and perhaps eventually nearly as valuable as per the near-side LSE that's focused upon Earth. The moon is also the key communications platform for interplanetary as well as interstellar communications, as why even bother going to such other places if we can request a few digital postcards, and/or locally obtain those efficient SAR 10 mm/pixel and of 16 bit resolution images of whatever's on the surface of Saturn (at least technically that's perfectly doable if we had such an extended base line and the backside LSE established, as per that tether dipole extension is unlimited, worth at least worth 1e6 km). Basic township situated upon Venus: http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town.htm Basic Lunar Space Elevator: http://guthvenus.tripod.com/lunar-space-elevator.htm Regards, Brad Guth / GASA-IEIS topics: http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-topics.htm |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Apollo Hoax FAQ (is not spam) :-) | Nathan Jones | Misc | 6 | July 29th 04 06:14 AM |
Apollo | Buzz alDredge | Astronomy Misc | 5 | July 28th 04 10:05 AM |
The Apollo Hoax FAQ | darla | Misc | 10 | July 25th 04 02:57 PM |
The apollo faq | the inquirer | Astronomy Misc | 11 | April 22nd 04 06:23 AM |
significant addition to section 25 of the faq | heat | Astronomy Misc | 1 | April 15th 04 01:20 AM |