![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sure is: this is also the reason why the shuttle sucks - money, time, and
effort; and keeps space the deserted realm of the elite. The shuttle was a great way to keep a small part of the MIC (Military Industrial Complex) in a sufficient state of tune to enable relative ease of transition to warfighting, when economic reasons demand BUT It (the Shuttle) is abysmally bad for the ultimate expression of Homo Sapiens only real destiny - the great Diaspora into space. And if the MIC continues on its merry way, we are gonna need another place to run to pretty soon... SO Imagine that the only returnable part of the shuttle being the crew quarters - a hypersonic lifting body stunning in its simplicity, with maybe a couple of turbofans (light ones) for powered flight back to base. Designed to piggy back onto the fuel tank, but autonomous from it, and able to be boosted into orbit via other craft. More of a life boat than a command ship, and able to seperate from the fuel tank like an F111 cockpit if needs be... Imagine that the other parts of the 'new' shuttle were designed to be thrown into space AND REUSED.. somewhat like skylab BUT NOT THROWN BACK....EVER. So that the todays expendables are tomorrows RECYCLABLES... After all Space is a Desert - the most precious resource in that desert is ANYTHING Any stuff up there at all is better than what is already there - NOTHING (well maybe a few protons and other stuff - anybody know what the net flux and elemental mix of Solar Wind is? Can it be utilised as a resource? not right now? thought so) Use the 'Fuel tank' and anything else that is sent up for building, or for anything - even just as reaction mass for Ion drives. Use it for anything BUT DON'T WASTE IT, and certainly don't leave it lying around for someone else to run into. There should be laws against space littering! anyway, Use unspent fuel (must be LOX and Hydrogen) to make water and electricity. So no matter what cargo the fuel tank is throwing up there, it will always be lifting the same mass - a mix of crew craft/cargo/fuel tank/fuel that is always the same mass - the max it can lift! if needs be make up the difference in fuel. Use the water to inflate the outer skin (and inner bones) of habitats, maybe even deep freeze the water - strong stuff when frozen! Makes a nice window too, and a good insulator... Meteors are GOOD, because they are STUFF, and stuff is SCARCE... so catch them! Use the carbon (and other vital elements) in the recyclables to make sugars and then plastics and then habitats/food. Use organics for food, pharmaceuticals and ELECTRONICS too Spin the habitats/factories/farms up as giant Von Braun wheels, because we NEED gravity. (say what are the engineering characteristics of water/ice/waterglass/aerogel/plastic in space, anyone know?) WELCOME people to the habitats, either as tourists or as perms... discourage return to Earth as expensive and uncool... Set up service industries; space may be the ideal place for call centers... ![]() (Is it easier to print organs/organic structures in zero G, anyone know?) Turn the wheel on its side, apply thrust via ion beam/sail and Roll across the Desert of the Sky, like giant Conestoga wheels, seeking a manifest destiny. And with lots of time to get there... sigh Where to put it - initially at a Lagrangean point in front of the Moon maybe, probably not LEO because LEO is fickle! We don't want to be spending too much time station keeping.. and we certainly don't want to be reliant on NASA for keeping us up there! Plus the Moon could provide much needed resources sent up via popgun... And the velocity differential Earth L Moon Moon L Earth is what? 50 m/s ? inexepensive! Hmmmm... Perhaps in the future such treasures as the Hubble will be placed near habitats... Perhaps they will be designed to be serviceable like, say a PC... you know - plug in modules and boards and stuff that could be done by say, a really dumb robot... or a human in a space suit, or even by itself! Say, can we make mirrors out of deep frozen ice?, can we wobble and flex ice electromagnetically (water is polar and static electrically susceptible, Ice? anyone know?) Can we make GRIN lenses out of ice/water/sugar? But this would defeat the purpose of the MIC; no profit once the thing is built eh? Got to keep on building new ones to utter rediculous perfection (because the expensive part is getting them up there) and throwing the old ones away cos it keeps the MIC going. Even when they are some of the most exquisite examples of engineering that has even been seen. Or even just consideed as reaction mass... The hubble would keep a solar powered ION drive fed for quite a while.. What a WASTE! sigh Dreaming? yup Is all of this do-able? with todays technology? yup Will there be glitches? yup, but there is nothing like being faced with a technological problem in the immediacy of space to get the creative juices flowing eh! will any of this happen - GOD I hope so In my lifetime, probably not What a WASTE bye |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[Fwd: Top Secret Earth Station Message-Five Star-*****] | Bill Sheppard | Misc | 169 | January 7th 05 09:08 PM |
Congressional Resolutions on Hubble Space Telescope | EFLASPO | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | April 1st 04 03:26 PM |
First Moonwalk? A Russian Perspective | Jason Donahue | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | February 1st 04 03:33 AM |
First Moonwalk? A Russian Perspective | Astronaut | Misc | 0 | January 31st 04 03:11 AM |
International Space Station Science - One of NASA's rising stars | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | December 27th 03 01:32 PM |