![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Fortunately, I don't have the problem in the title, but a friend cautioned
me about it through an experience a colleague of his had. The story is this. If you take your lens off, make sure that you turn the power off. Apparently, the static charge on the chip can more easily attract small particles when charged, and it is very difficult to get to the mirror to clean it. Further, he said cleaning the mirror can be a real problem. His colleague experienced this problem when he repeatedly had to change lenses in a short time (several hours). So is this anecdontal or is there some basis in fact for the claim? -- Wayne T. Watson (Watson Adventures, Prop., Nevada City, CA) (121.015 Deg. W, 39.262 Deg. N) GMT-8 hr std. time) Obz Site: 39° 15' 7" N, 121° 2' 32" W, 2700 feet Most vehicle/deer accidents occur at sunset. Vehicle deer whistles are ineffective. Web Page: home.earthlink.net/~mtnviews |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 15:37:14 GMT, "W. Wat son"
wrote: Fortunately, I don't have the problem in the title, but a friend cautioned me about it through an experience a colleague of his had. The story is this. If you take your lens off, make sure that you turn the power off. Apparently, the static charge on the chip can more easily attract small particles when charged, and it is very difficult to get to the mirror to clean it. Further, he said cleaning the mirror can be a real problem. His colleague experienced this problem when he repeatedly had to change lenses in a short time (several hours). So is this anecdontal or is there some basis in fact for the claim? I'd say this is nonsense. CCD and CMOS sensors operate at very low voltages- they don't develop static charges on the cover glass as a result of being operated. And even if they did, static charges are difficult to remove from insulators- simply turning off the power isn't going to make the charge dissipate. A dirty mirror is not of much concern since it has no impact on the images. If it gets dusty enough it might be irritating to use the viewfinder, but that's all. Dust on the cover glass of the sensor will show up on images, but that doesn't happen too often- it is protected by the shutter. I see a bit of fluff show up once a month or so (and I use the camera daily, and change lenses often). I just keep a little can of air in my bag to blow off the sensor (and mirror) when that happens. No big deal. _________________________________________________ Chris L Peterson Cloudbait Observatory http://www.cloudbait.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 15:37:14 GMT, "W. Wat son" wrote: Fortunately, I don't have the problem in the title, but a friend cautioned me about it through an experience a colleague of his had. The story is this. If you take your lens off, make sure that you turn the power off. Apparently, the static charge on the chip can more easily attract small particles when charged, and it is very difficult to get to the mirror to clean it. Further, he said cleaning the mirror can be a real problem. His colleague experienced this problem when he repeatedly had to change lenses in a short time (several hours). So is this anecdontal or is there some basis in fact for the claim? I'd say this is nonsense. CCD and CMOS sensors operate at very low voltages- they don't develop static charges on the cover glass as a result of being operated. And even if they did, static charges are difficult to remove from insulators- simply turning off the power isn't going to make the charge dissipate. A dirty mirror is not of much concern since it has no impact on the images. If it gets dusty enough it might be irritating to use the viewfinder, but that's all. Dust on the cover glass of the sensor will show up on images, but that doesn't happen too often- it is protected by the shutter. I see a bit of fluff show up once a month or so (and I use the camera daily, and change lenses often). I just keep a little can of air in my bag to blow off the sensor (and mirror) when that happens. No big deal. _________________________________________________ Chris L Peterson Cloudbait Observatory http://www.cloudbait.com Perhaps we have an Urban Legend. I did use the wrong term in the above. I meant chip and not mirror. Yes, the mirror is of little concern. -- Wayne T. Watson (Watson Adventures, Prop., Nevada City, CA) (121.015 Deg. W, 39.262 Deg. N) GMT-8 hr std. time) Obz Site: 39° 15' 7" N, 121° 2' 32" W, 2700 feet Most vehicle/deer accidents occur at sunset. Vehicle deer whistles are ineffective. Web Page: home.earthlink.net/~mtnviews |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Depending on the shots you take, dust on the sensor of a DSLR can be a huge
deal. It's not actually on the sensor, though. The sensor is actually sealed behind a number of optical layers (like the IR filter and byers mask.) The dust actually collects on a plate of glass a small distance away from the sensor. Because the dust is not directly on the sensor, the focal ratio at which you are shooting will affect whether the dust will be in focus or not. At fast focal ratios, say F10 or faster, you generally don't see the dust, unless there is a really huge chunk of something on the sensor. If you shoot at much higher focal lengths, then it is very apparent. Here is an experiment you can try (warning - don't do this if knowing about dust in your images will bother you.) Put a terrestrial lens on the camera and set it up for aperture priority. Set the highest focal ratio you can - at least F20, but F30 or more would demonstrate better. Now lock the focus on a distant object and then take a picture of an evenly lit part of the sky. You are almost guaranteed to see dust spots in the image. If you have not cleaned the sensor in a few months, you will probably see a whole lot of dust. If you usually use faster focal ratios in your shots, then you don't really need to worry about this. If you are doing astrophotography, then flat frames will take care of any dust spots. If you have dust spots that are big enough to show up in terrestrial photography using a fast focal ratio, then using a blower should work. If you want to make the rest of the dust go away, then the only way to do so without voiding the warranty on the camera is to have it cleaned by an authorized dealer. If you want to clean the sensor yourself, there is a cottage industry springing up around doing this. A quick search on something like 'clean dslr sensor dust' will give you plenty of reading. Note that if you scratch or otherwise damage the sensor while doing this yourself, it will definitely not be covered under warranty. Thanks, -Wade "Chris L Peterson" wrote in message ... On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 15:37:14 GMT, "W. Wat son" wrote: Fortunately, I don't have the problem in the title, but a friend cautioned me about it through an experience a colleague of his had. The story is this. If you take your lens off, make sure that you turn the power off. Apparently, the static charge on the chip can more easily attract small particles when charged, and it is very difficult to get to the mirror to clean it. Further, he said cleaning the mirror can be a real problem. His colleague experienced this problem when he repeatedly had to change lenses in a short time (several hours). So is this anecdontal or is there some basis in fact for the claim? I'd say this is nonsense. CCD and CMOS sensors operate at very low voltages- they don't develop static charges on the cover glass as a result of being operated. And even if they did, static charges are difficult to remove from insulators- simply turning off the power isn't going to make the charge dissipate. A dirty mirror is not of much concern since it has no impact on the images. If it gets dusty enough it might be irritating to use the viewfinder, but that's all. Dust on the cover glass of the sensor will show up on images, but that doesn't happen too often- it is protected by the shutter. I see a bit of fluff show up once a month or so (and I use the camera daily, and change lenses often). I just keep a little can of air in my bag to blow off the sensor (and mirror) when that happens. No big deal. _________________________________________________ Chris L Peterson Cloudbait Observatory http://www.cloudbait.com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I deciced to call Canon's tech support, and put it to them. They don't
think it's a problem, but do suggest that it be turned off when changing lenses. The reason is that one is making and breaking electrical contacts between the camera and lens. It sounds to me like one need not worry either way, and and my friend's colleague might find his difficulty arose for other reasons. User's choice. -- Wayne T. Watson (Watson Adventures, Prop., Nevada City, CA) (121.015 Deg. W, 39.262 Deg. N) GMT-8 hr std. time) Obz Site: 39° 15' 7" N, 121° 2' 32" W, 2700 feet Most vehicle/deer accidents occur at sunset. Vehicle deer whistles are ineffective. Web Page: home.earthlink.net/~mtnviews |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cassini Spacecraft "Sandblasted" By Dust From Saturn System In 2004(Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | January 21st 05 11:32 PM |
Canon EOS 300D, Rebel, CF Repair, Covington | W. Wat son | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | January 21st 05 06:51 PM |
Canon 300D | Szaki | Amateur Astronomy | 10 | April 20th 04 03:28 AM |
Canon EOS Rebel Digital | Tdcarls | Amateur Astronomy | 9 | September 22nd 03 07:58 PM |
Tethered free flying wings | Pete Lynn | Policy | 6 | August 9th 03 09:16 AM |