Is there a neutron star in our solar system ? ? ? ?

I heard one of the moons of Jupiter or Saturn is a neutron star.

Is that true or just a myth?

(Hans-Marc Olsen) writes:

I heard one of the moons of Jupiter or Saturn is a neutron star.

Is that true or just a myth?

It's not even credible -- even the smallest neutron star would mass more than
our sun, and the observed motions of Jupiter and Saturn are precisely what
they're expected to be if they're planets orbiting the sun. The gravity
effects alone would have made it impossible to get Voyager or Cassini anywhere
near those planets.

--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey ) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2004-05 Houston Aeros)

On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 00:28:09 -0800, Hans-Marc Olsen wrote:

I heard one of the moons of Jupiter or Saturn is a neutron star.

Is that true or just a myth?


Think about it. You'll know the answer.

Unbelievable....

Patrick Lee Humphrey wrote in message
:

(Hans-Marc Olsen) writes:

I heard one of the moons of Jupiter or Saturn is a neutron star.

Is that true or just a myth?

It's not even credible -- even the smallest neutron star would mass
more than our sun,

Yeah. A smaller (lighter) amount of neutronic mass just wouldn't be
stable.

and the observed motions of Jupiter and Saturn are precisely what
they're expected to be if they're planets orbiting the sun. The
gravity effects alone would have made it impossible to get Voyager or
Cassini anywhere near those planets.

On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 06:06:07 -0600, Patrick Lee Humphrey wrote:

It's not even credible -- even the smallest neutron star would mass more than
our sun, and the observed motions of Jupiter and Saturn are precisely what
they're expected to be if they're planets orbiting the sun. The gravity
effects alone would have made it impossible to get Voyager or Cassini anywhere
near those planets.

Um, what if it's a special 'lighweight' pulsar, the rough equivalent of a
watermelon pulsar with the density of essentially a typical moon.

That might account for the fact it can't be detected. Remember, if these folks
'feel' it is right, then it must be, and absence of evidence doesn't mean
evidence of absence.

Remember what we learned with PlanetX. Maybe we can get Rudolph_X to
scrum up some posts from Rense on that topic.

O'

OhBrother wrote:

On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 06:06:07 -0600, Patrick Lee Humphrey wrote:

It's not even credible -- even the smallest neutron star would mass more
than
our sun, and the observed motions of Jupiter and Saturn are precisely what
they're expected to be if they're planets orbiting the sun. The gravity
effects alone would have made it impossible to get Voyager or Cassini
anywhere
near those planets.

Um, what if it's a special 'lighweight' pulsar, the rough equivalent of a
watermelon pulsar with the density of essentially a typical moon.

That might account for the fact it can't be detected. Remember, if these folks
'feel' it is right, then it must be, and absence of evidence doesn't mean
evidence of absence.

Remember what we learned with PlanetX. Maybe we can get Rudolph_X to
scrum up some posts from Rense on that topic.

And label more posters "mother insultors".

--

"Hans-Marc Olsen" wrote in message
m...
I heard one of the moons of Jupiter or Saturn is a neutron star.

Is that true or just a myth?

you are an idiot.