![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
A question addressed to Celestron achromat users. On their website C. does not tell what lens quality they use today to made their achromat lenses (e.g. in CR-6 f/8) In the past (a couple years ago) their ED lens was qualify of very good quality and even recommended. Some users told me that currents lens are HD now... What are the current quality, always ED or a real mix including HD and other dispersions ? Any info on the Internet or review about them is welcome to update an article. Thanks in advance. Thierry http://www.astrosurf.com/lombry/rapp...berrations.htm |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Any info on the Internet or review about them is welcome to update an article. HI Thierry: To my knowledge, this has never featured ED glass. It is a plain old acrhomat made by Synta. Peace, Rod Mollise Author of _Choosing and Using a Schmidt Cassegrain Telescope_ Like SCTs and MCTs? Check-out sct-user, the mailing list for CAT fanciers! Goto http://members.aol.com/RMOLLISE/index.html |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Rod Mollise" wrote in message ... Any info on the Internet or review about them is welcome to update an article. HI Thierry: To my knowledge, this has never featured ED glass. It is a plain old acrhomat made by Synta. Still worse than expected ;-) Remain the chromacorr, even though.. Thanks. Thierry Peace, Rod Mollise Author of _Choosing and Using a Schmidt Cassegrain Telescope_ Like SCTs and MCTs? Check-out sct-user, the mailing list for CAT fanciers! Goto http://members.aol.com/RMOLLISE/index.html |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
peopel throw the term "ED" around like it was cheese. Any excuse and its
ED. Not too many years ago its was "quartz". Then "digital". Anyone care to nail down users of "diffraction limited"? You will get 20 experts testifying what it means or comes close to meaning, or should mean ... its like speed limits signs everyone knowswhat theyare but nobody drives them! Thierry wrote: Hi, A question addressed to Celestron achromat users. On their website C. does not tell what lens quality they use today to made their achromat lenses (e.g. in CR-6 f/8) In the past (a couple years ago) their ED lens was qualify of very good quality and even recommended. Some users told me that currents lens are HD now... What are the current quality, always ED or a real mix including HD and other dispersions ? Any info on the Internet or review about them is welcome to update an article. Thanks in advance. Thierry http://www.astrosurf.com/lombry/rapp...berrations.htm |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Celestron settles with Meade | Edward | Amateur Astronomy | 24 | July 14th 04 08:48 PM |
Tele Vue 76 flip-up lens cap? | Florian | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | March 1st 04 01:35 PM |
Has anyone done a comparison of the Photon Instruments 127mm refractor with the Celestron and Meade 6" refractors? | Bob Midiri | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | December 6th 03 06:13 PM |
Review: Celestron 10-30x50 Zoom Binoculars "UpClose Series" | HandyAndy | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | October 28th 03 03:58 PM |