![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andrew Yee wrote in message
: snip Tuesday, 05 October 2004 Mystery Object Neither Star Nor Brown Dwarf Astronomers using the Gemini North and Keck II telescopes have peered inside a violent binary star system to find that one of the interacting stars has lost so much mass to its partner that it has regressed to a strange, inert body resembling no known star type. Unable to sustain nuclear fusion at its core and doomed to orbit with its much more energetic white dwarf partner for millions of years, the dead star is essentially a new, indeterminate type of stellar object. "Like the classic line about the aggrieved partner in a romantic relationship, the smaller donor star gave, and gave, and gave some more until it had nothing left to give," says Steve B. Howell, an astronomer with Wisconsin-Indiana-Yale-NOAO (WIYN) telescope and the National Optical Astronomy Observatory, Tucson, AZ. "Now the donor star has reached a dead end -- it is far too massive to be considered a super-planet, its composition does not match known brown dwarfs, and it is far too low in mass to be a star. There's no true category for an object in such limbo." Maybe it should be called a 'dead star'. The binary system, known as EF Eridanus (abbreviated EF Eri), is located 300 light-years from Earth in the constellation Eridanus. EF Eri consists of a faint white dwarf star with about 60 percent of the mass of the Sun and the donor object of unknown type, which has an estimated bulk of only 1/20th of a solar mass. Howell and Thomas E. Harrison of New Mexico State University made high-precision infrared measurements of the binary star system using the spectrographic capabilities of the Near Infrared Imager (NIRI) on the Gemini North telescope and NIRSPEC on Keck II both on Mauna Kea in December 2002 and September 2003, respectively. Supporting observations were made with the 2.1-meter telescope at Kitt Peak National Observatory near Tucson in September 2002. EF Eri is a type of binary star system known as magnetic cataclysmic variables. This class of systems may produce many more of these 'dead' objects than scientists have realized, says Harrison, co-author of a paper on the discovery to be published in the October 20 issue of the Astrophysical Journal. "These types of systems are not generally accounted for within the usual census figures of star systems in a typical galaxy," Harrison says. "They certainly should be considered more carefully." Esp. if there could be many of these. snip |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andrew Yee wrote in message
: snip Tuesday, 05 October 2004 Mystery Object Neither Star Nor Brown Dwarf Astronomers using the Gemini North and Keck II telescopes have peered inside a violent binary star system to find that one of the interacting stars has lost so much mass to its partner that it has regressed to a strange, inert body resembling no known star type. Unable to sustain nuclear fusion at its core and doomed to orbit with its much more energetic white dwarf partner for millions of years, the dead star is essentially a new, indeterminate type of stellar object. "Like the classic line about the aggrieved partner in a romantic relationship, the smaller donor star gave, and gave, and gave some more until it had nothing left to give," says Steve B. Howell, an astronomer with Wisconsin-Indiana-Yale-NOAO (WIYN) telescope and the National Optical Astronomy Observatory, Tucson, AZ. "Now the donor star has reached a dead end -- it is far too massive to be considered a super-planet, its composition does not match known brown dwarfs, and it is far too low in mass to be a star. There's no true category for an object in such limbo." Well... Drained star? Leached star? Exploited star? Eroded star? The binary system, known as EF Eridanus (abbreviated EF Eri), is located 300 light-years from Earth in the constellation Eridanus. EF Eri consists of a faint white dwarf star with about 60 percent of the mass of the Sun and the donor object of unknown type, which has an estimated bulk of only 1/20th of a solar mass. Howell and Thomas E. Harrison of New Mexico State University made high-precision infrared measurements of the binary star system using the spectrographic capabilities of the Near Infrared Imager (NIRI) on the Gemini North telescope and NIRSPEC on Keck II both on Mauna Kea in December 2002 and September 2003, respectively. Supporting observations were made with the 2.1-meter telescope at Kitt Peak National Observatory near Tucson in September 2002. EF Eri is a type of binary star system known as magnetic cataclysmic variables. This class of systems may produce many more of these 'dead' objects than scientists have realized, says Harrison, co-author of a paper on the discovery to be published in the October 20 issue of the Astrophysical Journal. "These types of systems are not generally accounted for within the usual census figures of star systems in a typical galaxy," Harrison says. "They certainly should be considered more carefully." Esp. if there could be many of these. snip |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Mr. 4X
writes Andrew Yee wrote in message : snip Tuesday, 05 October 2004 Mystery Object Neither Star Nor Brown Dwarf Astronomers using the Gemini North and Keck II telescopes have peered inside a violent binary star system to find that one of the interacting stars has lost so much mass to its partner that it has regressed to a strange, inert body resembling no known star type. Unable to sustain nuclear fusion at its core and doomed to orbit with its much more energetic white dwarf partner for millions of years, the dead star is essentially a new, indeterminate type of stellar object. "Like the classic line about the aggrieved partner in a romantic relationship, the smaller donor star gave, and gave, and gave some more until it had nothing left to give," says Steve B. Howell, an astronomer with Wisconsin-Indiana-Yale-NOAO (WIYN) telescope and the National Optical Astronomy Observatory, Tucson, AZ. "Now the donor star has reached a dead end -- it is far too massive to be considered a super-planet, its composition does not match known brown dwarfs, and it is far too low in mass to be a star. There's no true category for an object in such limbo." Well... Drained star? Leached star? Exploited star? Eroded star? Hollywood? :-) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 05 Oct 2004 18:56:02 -0400, Andrew Yee
wrote: "Like the classic line about the aggrieved partner in a romantic relationship, the smaller donor star gave, and gave, and gave some more until it had nothing left to give," An enabling star? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Massive Old Star Reveals Secrets On Deathbed (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 1 | January 26th 04 06:40 PM |
Young Star Caught Speeding (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | January 5th 04 11:49 PM |
Space Calendar - October 24, 2003 | Ron Baalke | Misc | 0 | October 24th 03 04:38 PM |