![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
One-man version of SpaceShipOne may be next stage in development of
space holidays Pasted from: http://www.flightinternational.com/f...86036&Code=106 A one-person version of Scaled Composites' SpaceShipOne that reaches an orbit of 130km (81 miles) to rendezvous with an orbiting hotel may form the next stage of Burt Rutan's private manned spaceflight plans. Speaking at a lecture organised by the Manx Festival of Aviation at the Royal Aeronautical Society in London, the aerospace designer detailed how such an orbital vehicle could be evolved from his existing three-man, suborbital 3,000kg (6,600lb) SpaceShipOne. The amount of spacecraft mass dedicated to fuel would be increased to achieve the greater altitude and speed required. "We'd have a small cramped cabin for the orbital flight and you'd be in it for a long time. You'd want to go to a hotel [because of that] and for orbital tourism you'd want an altitude of 130km," says Rutan. In his lecture, Rutan referred to plans by Robert Bigelow, founder of Bigelow Aerospace, to develop a space hotel based on NASA-originated inflatable habitat technology. Before Rutan begins work on orbital flight technology, he will attempt to win the X-Prize, which requires two suborbital flights within two weeks carrying a mass equivalent to three people. Rutan's first flight is scheduled for 29 September and his second for 4 October. But before he flies for the second time, competing Canadian X-Prize team da Vinci Project is scheduled to try to reach space in its Wild Fire rocket on 2 October. Another X-Prize team, Space Transportation, saw its Rubicon One rocket fail a flight test in Washington on 8 August seconds after launch. The engines of the $20,000 rocket failed after it reached an altitude of 1,000ft (305m). Rubicon One's remains crashed to Earth 61m from its launch site after its parachute system failed. It was carrying three dummies representing the pilot and passengers. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Neil Halelamien wrote: "We'd have a small cramped cabin for the orbital flight and you'd be in it for a long time. You'd want to go to a hotel [because of that] and for orbital tourism you'd want an altitude of 130km," says Rutan. Yikes. You'd want higher than that, and you'd want more than one guy. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My suspicion regarding the altitude is that it was either a misquote,
or Rutan mispoke. If I understand correctly, you'd need at least 350km for a stable orbit. -- Neil |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 06 Oct 2004 03:27:16 GMT, in a place far, far away, Scott
Lowther made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that: Neil Halelamien wrote: "We'd have a small cramped cabin for the orbital flight and you'd be in it for a long time. You'd want to go to a hotel [because of that] and for orbital tourism you'd want an altitude of 130km," says Rutan. Yikes. You'd want higher than that, and you'd want more than one guy. And you'd want a vehicle that could enter at Mach teens, rather than Mach three... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Neil Halelamien" wrote in message
oups.com... My suspicion regarding the altitude is that it was either a misquote, or Rutan mispoke. If I understand correctly, you'd need at least 350km for a stable orbit. Probably a misquote on both the size of the vehicle (one person or one passenger?) as well as the low orbit. -- Alan Erskine We can get people to the Moon in five years, not the fifteen GWB proposes. Give NASA a real challenge |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Scott Lowther wrote: Neil Halelamien wrote: "We'd have a small cramped cabin for the orbital flight and you'd be in it for a long time. You'd want to go to a hotel [because of that] and for orbital tourism you'd want an altitude of 130km," says Rutan. Yikes. You'd want higher than that, and you'd want more than one guy. For a tourist thing but maybe his design can't get more than one guy there. It starts with this stuff about needing more people and pretty soon we have that damn Space Shuttle again. -- "And he did bring them. It took a number of years, but one by one he brought them here. Except for his father, that old man died where he was born." -+ "Elia Kazan, "America, America" |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Neil Halelamien wrote: One-man version of SpaceShipOne may be next stage in development of space holidays Another X-Prize team, Space Transportation, saw its Rubicon One rocket fail a flight test in Washington on 8 August seconds after launch. The engines of the $20,000 rocket failed after it reached an altitude of 1,000ft (305m). Rubicon One's remains crashed to Earth 61m from its launch site after its parachute system failed. It was carrying three dummies representing the pilot and passengers. They patched up Edwards and got him in the debate pretty quickly. -- "And he did bring them. It took a number of years, but one by one he brought them here. Except for his father, that old man died where he was born." -+ "Elia Kazan, "America, America" |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scott Lowther :
Neil Halelamien wrote: "We'd have a small cramped cabin for the orbital flight and you'd be in it for a long time. You'd want to go to a hotel [because of that] and for orbital tourism you'd want an altitude of 130km," says Rutan. Yikes. You'd want higher than that, and you'd want more than one guy. Why, electric rockets or tethers can keep the station up, with one man rockets you have a lot of traffic bring up supplies. At one time most of China moved on bikes, it did not stop them from getting to work. Start small and work your way up. The problem with present day NASA is that it always wants to start big. Earl Colby Pottinger -- I make public email sent to me! Hydrogen Peroxide Rockets, OpenBeos, SerialTransfer 3.0, RAMDISK, BoatBuilding, DIY TabletPC. What happened to the time? http://webhome.idirect.com/~earlcp |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Joe Strout :
In article , h (Rand Simberg) wrote: "We'd have a small cramped cabin for the orbital flight and you'd be in it for a long time. You'd want to go to a hotel [because of that] and for orbital tourism you'd want an altitude of 130km," says Rutan. Yikes. You'd want higher than that, and you'd want more than one guy. And you'd want a vehicle that could enter at Mach teens, rather than Mach three... I'm sure that Rutan hasn't overlooked the reentry problem. As for the capacity -- yes, one person seems a bit on the low side. But it's a start. It couldn't ferry normal people to orbit but it could perhaps serve to rotate the highly-trained crew of a space station, perhaps more cheaply than the alternatives. Or, perhaps you could have the craft flown remotely or via automation, so that it could in fact carry an untrained passenger. Though I admit that seems unlikely. Look at the pickle NASA is in now because Shuttle and the ISS. If they had one man craft that could reach the ISS and return then they could get a lot more done. More likely, the plan is to first make a prototype craft in which a highly trained pilot can reach orbit -- that in itself is a tremendous achievement! Then to scale it up still further so that it can carry one or more passengers. Yes, why build a big monster when you are still testing out your designs. Earl Colby Pottinger -- I make public email sent to me! Hydrogen Peroxide Rockets, OpenBeos, SerialTransfer 3.0, RAMDISK, BoatBuilding, DIY TabletPC. What happened to the time? http://webhome.idirect.com/~earlcp |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Rutan plans commercial tourist spacecraft | Joe Strout | Policy | 21 | June 21st 04 05:44 PM |
Decision on the Soyuz TMA-4 spacecraft prelaunch processing | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | April 1st 04 01:12 PM |
orbit question | Jan Philips | History | 7 | September 29th 03 06:16 PM |
SMART-1: The First Spacecraft Of The Future | Ron Baalke | Misc | 0 | September 22nd 03 04:47 PM |