underwires, do they work

nightbat wrote

G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:

Hi Sam Viagra helps take the sag out. My wife worries more about her
sagging behind. Myself I'm a tit man and like when they stick straight
out. Very hard to find. Gravity moves them towards the center of the
Earth first. Bert

nightbat

Isn't that the underlining abstract mathematical theory basis
for your book friends string and M theory, imaginary invisible
underwires? Bert, this is not a sci fi forum, but a serious physics
international newsgroup community, composed of prominent, contributing,
and world renown scientists and researchers.

Your referencing to site link Sam Wormley about your wife's fear of loss
of tight buns, or your own preference for erect nipples is questionable
subject matter and not relative and for some inappropriate for such a
profound science newsgroup. You have already promised not to talk about
personal sexual practices or include self explicit orientations on these
net science newsgroups yet you can't apparently help yourself. Ok, we
know already of your wife's viagra spiking of your food and your posted
over infatuation with birthday suit out in space ship net group contact
alien Darla, and her tits. But please Bert, some of us are not into wild
spiked up sex, or thoughts of cosmic rumps with alien cuties. Science
posters, for the most part, are into profound science research concepts
and theories, TOE's, GUT's, gravity dynamics, universe understanding,
experiment proposals including their possible outcome evaluation, not
your posted three times a day sex rumps with your wife versus her
wanting you to cut the grass.

Ok, I acknowledge that original post subject question topic on
underwires was leading, and that's all you apparently need to get you
going, but please Bert, control yourself, if nothing else in the name of
science. You must always try to keep separate human deep sexual
instincts from deeper theoretical physics, astro concepts, and net group
science more pensive preoccupation's. Ha, ha, ha, by the way, I like
those Mother Nature perky, gravity defying, particular propensity
subject, female assets, myself.


the nightbat

dynamics, universe understanding

dynamic
relation
o
cc
oo
o|o
universe
responds
~/~
////
@
aeaeaeaea
asdfghjklwertyuicvbnm
_______
Blog, or dog? Who knows. But if you see my lost pup, please ping me!
A
HREF="http://journals.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo"http://journal
s.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo/A

entary (Brilliant One) wrote in message ...
dynamics, universe understanding

dynamic
relation
o
cc
oo
o|o
universe
responds
~/~
////
@
aeaeaeaea
asdfghjklwertyuicvbnm
_______
Blog, or dog? Who knows. But if you see my lost pup, please ping me!
A
HREF="http://journals.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo"http://journal
s.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo/A


No.

Original state:

UU

Underwires applied:

O O

Isn't science wonderful?

Double-A

Hi nightbat You make me laugh. I only hope all you posted was reality.
True all that extra viagro is causing problems.Like "Pee-Air" is getting
in the way of my typing finger.(right now) The reason 3 times a day for
sex is needed I'm a Boston minute man(yes) By the way nightbat you are
cross posting "Sam" is in another news group,and has his nose sticking
out of his pants (pants to long) fly Strange my wife always liked Sam
over the years. Truth is nightbat it is either having sex with my wife
or cutting the grass. What would you do?(take my wife please) As far as
Darla goes she is a fantasy,and I use thoughts of her for masturbating
only.(why not) I can mix sex with science because our universe has to be
very sexy to produce so much life. Bert

No.

Original state:

UU

Underwires applied:

O O

Isn't science wonderful?

Double-A


?

_______
Blog, or dog? Who knows. But if you see my lost pup, please ping me!
A
HREF="http://journals.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo"http://journal
s.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo/A

Double-A


?

too crowded

_______
Blog, or dog? Who knows. But if you see my lost pup, please ping me!
A
HREF="http://journals.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo"http://journal
s.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo/A

The word is "romp", not "rump". Hopefully, you will digress from
commentary.

This is a perfect demonstration of the failure of modern science: the
failure to communicate ideas--however brilliant they may be--results in
those ideas being mothballed, and forgotten, needing to be rediscovered.

For example, your postulate: "some of us are not into wild
spiked up sex, or thoughts of cosmic rumps with alien cuties" (sic) is
entirely invalid and inspires me to think of pretty alien asses, NOT sex
with pretty aliens. As I am thinking of pretty alien asses, I entirely
forget the original premise: "some of us are not into wild
spiked up sex, or thoughts of cosmic romps with alien cuties", which may
may not be true.

These miscommunications are, in my opinion, the single greatest
stumbling-block in the advancement of science. If all science could be
reduced to terms a layman could understand, if no discoveries had to be
rediscovered, if no time and energy and money was wasted because of
misperception of that which has been understood (but poorly expressed) by
brilliant scientists, our planet would be benefitted greatly by good
science. In actual fact, bad science is killing our planet; if we don't
learn to communicate, and soon, our planet may soon be a dustball.


..sSweetMarie



On Sat, 09 Oct 2004 04:56:48 -0500, nightbat wrote:

nightbat wrote

G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:

Hi Sam Viagra helps take the sag out. My wife worries more about her
sagging behind. Myself I'm a tit man and like when they stick straight
out. Very hard to find. Gravity moves them towards the center of the
Earth first. Bert

nightbat

Isn't that the underlining abstract mathematical theory basis
for your book friends string and M theory, imaginary invisible
underwires? Bert, this is not a sci fi forum, but a serious physics
international newsgroup community, composed of prominent, contributing,
and world renown scientists and researchers.

Your referencing to site link Sam Wormley about your wife's fear of loss
of tight buns, or your own preference for erect nipples is questionable
subject matter and not relative and for some inappropriate for such a
profound science newsgroup. You have already promised not to talk about
personal sexual practices or include self explicit orientations on these
net science newsgroups yet you can't apparently help yourself. Ok, we
know already of your wife's viagra spiking of your food and your posted
over infatuation with birthday suit out in space ship net group contact
alien Darla, and her tits. But please Bert, some of us are not into wild
spiked up sex, or thoughts of cosmic rumps with alien cuties. Science
posters, for the most part, are into profound science research concepts
and theories, TOE's, GUT's, gravity dynamics, universe understanding,
experiment proposals including their possible outcome evaluation, not
your posted three times a day sex rumps with your wife versus her
wanting you to cut the grass.

Ok, I acknowledge that original post subject question topic on
underwires was leading, and that's all you apparently need to get you
going, but please Bert, control yourself, if nothing else in the name of
science. You must always try to keep separate human deep sexual
instincts from deeper theoretical physics, astro concepts, and net group
science more pensive preoccupation's. Ha, ha, ha, by the way, I like
those Mother Nature perky, gravity defying, particular propensity
subject, female assets, myself.


the nightbat

For example, your postulate: "some of us are not into wild
spiked up sex, or thoughts

Certainly, incorrect!
Come, in[spect]
You late, too!
*tapping foot,
with irritated look*
O dear, need to come
Some supper ~
No food for me all day.
Never too late
For scrumptious fare,
Say, start with a touch ~
Caviar...

_______
Blog, or dog? Who knows. But if you see my lost pup, please ping me!
A
HREF="http://journals.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo"http://journal
s.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo/A

nightbat wrote

".sSweetMarie" wrote:

On Sat, 09 Oct 2004 04:56:48 -0500, nightbat wrote:

nightbat wrote

G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:

Hi Sam Viagra helps take the sag out. My wife worries more about her
sagging behind. Myself I'm a tit man and like when they stick straight
out. Very hard to find. Gravity moves them towards the center of the
Earth first. Bert

nightbat

Isn't that the underlining abstract mathematical theory basis
for your book friends string and M theory, imaginary invisible
underwires? Bert, this is not a sci fi forum, but a serious physics
International newsgroup community, composed of prominent, contributing,
and world renown scientists and researchers.

Your referencing to site link Sam Wormley about your wife's fear of loss
of tight buns, or your own preference for erect nipples is questionable
subject matter and not relative and for some inappropriate for such a
profound science newsgroup. You have already promised not to talk about
personal sexual practices or include self explicit orientations on these
net science newsgroups yet you can't apparently help yourself. Ok, we
know already of your wife's viagra spiking of your food and your posted
over infatuation with birthday suit out in space ship net group contact
alien Darla, and her tits. But please Bert, some of us are not into wild
spiked up sex, or thoughts of cosmic rumps with alien cuties. Science
posters, for the most part, are into profound science research concepts
and theories, TOE's, GUT's, gravity dynamics, universe understanding,
experiment proposals including their possible outcome evaluation, not
your posted three times a day sex rumps with your wife versus her
wanting you to cut the grass.

Ok, I acknowledge that original post subject question topic on
underwires was leading, and that's all you apparently need to get you
going, but please Bert, control yourself, if nothing else in the name of
science. You must always try to keep separate human deep sexual
instincts from deeper theoretical physics, astro concepts, and net group
science more pensive preoccupation's. Ha, ha, ha, by the way, I like
those Mother Nature perky, gravity defying, particular propensity
subject, female assets, myself.


the nightbat


The word is "romp", not "rump". Hopefully, you will digress from
commentary.

This is a perfect demonstration of the failure of modern science: the
failure to communicate ideas--however brilliant they may be--results in
those ideas being mothballed, and forgotten, needing to be rediscovered.

For example, your postulate: "some of us are not into wild
spiked up sex, or thoughts of cosmic rumps with alien cuties" (sic) is
entirely invalid and inspires me to think of pretty alien asses, NOT sex
with pretty aliens. As I am thinking of pretty alien asses, I entirely
forget the original premise: "some of us are not into wild
spiked up sex, or thoughts of cosmic romps with alien cuties", which may
may not be true.

These miscommunications are, in my opinion, the single greatest
stumbling-block in the advancement of science. If all science could be
reduced to terms a layman could understand, if no discoveries had to be
rediscovered, if no time and energy and money was wasted because of
misperception of that which has been understood (but poorly expressed) by
brilliant scientists, our planet would be benefitted greatly by good
science. In actual fact, bad science is killing our planet; if we don't
learn to communicate, and soon, our planet may soon be a dustball.

.sSweetMarie


nightbat

First, ha, ha, ha, ha, your post is funnier then mine. Ok,
..sSweetMarie, top posting corrected, and the word is rump not your
understood romp, for it's all proper framing, with referenced frame
understanding and vivid literary pertinence. For Bert, in which the post
was addressed, understands physical play ( romp ) with an alien is less
possible and more his mental sexual fantasy ( rump ) compelling. He was
discussing with Sam here in sci.physics about his wife's rear, and her
fear of loss of elasticity. A rump in reference to alien Darla's, is one
I or I'm sure no other gentlemen would bother to try explaining to a
female Earth female with a ten foot pole.

I repeat, some of us here in sci.physics nor in other posted referenced
science groups that Bert and I normally post in are not into what Bert
has publicly affirmed being into nor his posted Darla alien possible
interlude masturbating fantasies. However, because of my vivid literary
proficiency and your lurking, you got the correct picture. Bert has no
intentions of romp or playing, for he has proclaimed his seriousness
about the cosmic mysterious cutie, our strange and admitted far advanced
alien Darla in alt.astronomy newsgroup.

Please, .sSweetMarie, I didn't suspect that my addressed to Bert post or
even your own at first admitted correct relayed understood picture might
in your mind or opinion be the fundamental premise for single greatest
stumbling-block in the advancement of science ". After all, I posted in
plain english not deep abstract physics symbols or formulas so as not to
alienate the very lay folks you speak of. I have posted for years on
these newsgroups in plain english about my " Black Comet " theory and to
date most don't know what I'm talking about. Would you prefer the base
unified field formula,

/\ = T3 E

If you wish better lay world science communication, I suggest raising
not lowering school standards, increasing educational funding, one
dominant world language, and you therefore have your work cut out for
yourself. Thankfully we have non liberal domain math to fill in the
cultural differences for now, even if it's not perfect. And you're
thinking pretty alien asses, Darla is admitted part ancestral dolphin
like, ha, ha, what picture are you getting? Bert has posted his three
times a day sex needs of his wife, I do not consider that romping. Still
I had hoped you would get the humor of my post because of the multi
language difficulty of the tower of babble and of course gentlemen to
gentlemen reserve in public forum. At least Bert the addressed poster
got it, and I am always respectful to Earth females, including posted
possibility of extraterrestrial and scientific checked passion aroused
for purported alien admitted ones. Alien Darla is admitted twin sexed,
not my cup of tea, but Bert's admitted fantasy cosmic girl.


the nightbat

Darla is admitted twin sexed,
not my cup of tea,

Got cock?
Lemme see!

_______
Blog, or dog? Who knows. But if you see my lost pup, please ping me!
A
HREF="http://journals.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo"http://journal
s.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo/A