Amateur astronomer takes pics of UFO's through telescope

"If you ever used a telescope you know that you have to constantly
readjust the direction that it is pointing because as the earth turns
the object that the telescope is pointing at quickly moves out of view.
It was while doing this that I noticed a bright object passing slowly
overhead. I assumed it was a satellite - but I thought it would be fun
to try and point the telescope at it and take a picture. It took me a
few moments to readjust the telescope. When I finally got it pointed at
the object I was surprised to see on my LCD that through the telescope
the camera picked up quite a bit of detail. I knew then that this wasn't
an ordinary satellite. I was expecting just a fine point of light.
However the sunlight on the object indicated (to me at least) that the
object was quite high, since down on the ground it was still dark."

Mo

http://iwasabducted.com/telescopicufo.htm

In t.cable.rogers.com,
Mad Scientist typed:
"If you ever used a telescope you know that you have to constantly
readjust the direction that it is pointing because as the earth turns
the object that the telescope is pointing at quickly moves out of
view. It was while doing this that I noticed a bright object passing
slowly overhead. I assumed it was a satellite - but I thought it
would be fun to try and point the telescope at it and take a picture.
It took me a few moments to readjust the telescope. When I finally
got it pointed at the object I was surprised to see on my LCD that
through the telescope the camera picked up quite a bit of detail. I
knew then that this wasn't an ordinary satellite. I was expecting
just a fine point of light. However the sunlight on the object
indicated (to me at least) that the object was quite high, since down
on the ground it was still dark."


Looks to me like a UFO.

A triangular object lit by sunlight that cannot be identified. And it seems
to be flying alright. Yes, an unidentified flying object, possibly rotating.

Fascinating...I wonder what it is?

What has this got to do with aliens and abduction?

Jo

Jo wrote:

In t.cable.rogers.com,
Mad Scientist typed:

"If you ever used a telescope you know that you have to constantly
readjust the direction that it is pointing because as the earth turns
the object that the telescope is pointing at quickly moves out of
view. It was while doing this that I noticed a bright object passing
slowly overhead. I assumed it was a satellite - but I thought it
would be fun to try and point the telescope at it and take a picture.
It took me a few moments to readjust the telescope. When I finally
got it pointed at the object I was surprised to see on my LCD that
through the telescope the camera picked up quite a bit of detail. I
knew then that this wasn't an ordinary satellite. I was expecting
just a fine point of light. However the sunlight on the object
indicated (to me at least) that the object was quite high, since down
on the ground it was still dark."



Looks to me like a UFO.

A triangular object lit by sunlight that cannot be identified. And it seems
to be flying alright. Yes, an unidentified flying object, possibly rotating.

Fascinating...I wonder what it is?

I have no idea. That is why we call them unidentified flying object.



What has this got to do with aliens and abduction?

Joe

I don't know. I figure the author of the web site has been abducted by
aliens in their life I guess. But like is proper for true scientific
investigation - remain objective (a simple task which many 'scientists'
fail miserbly to do in the case of UFO sightings and all the video and
photographic evidence) until more information is provided.

There are way more UFO pictures on this web site, some seen by the space
program when in space and many authenticated to be real UFO pictures.

In et.cable.rogers.com,
Mad Scientist typed:

Fascinating...I wonder what it is?

I have no idea. That is why we call them unidentified flying object.


Yes, exactly.



What has this got to do with aliens and abduction?

I don't know. I figure the author of the web site has been abducted
by aliens in their life I guess.

*Claims* to have been abducted.

But like is proper for true
scientific investigation - remain objective (a simple task which many
'scientists' fail miserbly to do in the case of UFO sightings and all
the video and photographic evidence) until more information is
provided.


Sure, which is why I was wondering what is the connection between UFOs and
aliens?

There are way more UFO pictures on this web site, some seen by the
space program when in space and many authenticated to be real UFO
pictures.


Yes, I have seen them. Some are deliberate fabrications, some are obvious
optical artifacts and others are simply objects that have not been
identified.

Jo

Mad Scientist, I respect your opinions on UFO's, but you seem to be just as
"un-objective" and biased towards your beliefs in UFO's as the scientists
you mention that are biased against it. I have an open mind and believe they
may be real. But, I haven't seen one solid piece of evidence supporting
this, except for blurry pictures and "eyewitness" accounts that cannot be
substantiated adequately. To believe that a blurry dot is a UFO is slightly
biased. Wouldn't you agree?

"Mad Scientist" wrote in message
et.cable.rogers.com...


Jo wrote:

In t.cable.rogers.com,
Mad Scientist typed:

"If you ever used a telescope you know that you have to constantly
readjust the direction that it is pointing because as the earth turns
the object that the telescope is pointing at quickly moves out of
view. It was while doing this that I noticed a bright object passing
slowly overhead. I assumed it was a satellite - but I thought it
would be fun to try and point the telescope at it and take a picture.
It took me a few moments to readjust the telescope. When I finally
got it pointed at the object I was surprised to see on my LCD that
through the telescope the camera picked up quite a bit of detail. I
knew then that this wasn't an ordinary satellite. I was expecting
just a fine point of light. However the sunlight on the object
indicated (to me at least) that the object was quite high, since down
on the ground it was still dark."



Looks to me like a UFO.

A triangular object lit by sunlight that cannot be identified. And it
seems
to be flying alright. Yes, an unidentified flying object, possibly
rotating.

Fascinating...I wonder what it is?

I have no idea. That is why we call them unidentified flying object.



What has this got to do with aliens and abduction?

Joe

I don't know. I figure the author of the web site has been abducted by
aliens in their life I guess. But like is proper for true scientific
investigation - remain objective (a simple task which many 'scientists'
fail miserbly to do in the case of UFO sightings and all the video and
photographic evidence) until more information is provided.

There are way more UFO pictures on this web site, some seen by the space
program when in space and many authenticated to be real UFO pictures.

Mike L wrote:

Mad Scientist, I respect your opinions on UFO's, but you seem to be just as
"un-objective" and biased towards your beliefs in UFO's as the scientists
you mention that are biased against it. I have an open mind and believe they
may be real. But, I haven't seen one solid piece of evidence supporting
this, except for blurry pictures and "eyewitness" accounts that cannot be
substantiated adequately. To believe that a blurry dot is a UFO is slightly
biased. Wouldn't you agree?

No I wouldnt agree, there is plenty of evidence, including government
and military documentation from all over the world. Would you accuse
someone of being biased when he says that the earth is round? Hardly
right. There is difference between having a biased view and knowing the
reality of UFO's but unfortunately so many people are mind-controlled on
this subject that they remain stuck like a broken record going around
and around in circles on the same old tired and worn out argument of
"are they real or not real" when for the most part after you have
investigated the subject for more than 20 years; you come to see how
such a discussion or debate is utterly puerile and ultimately produces
nothing of any value.

I suppose when you have countries the world over already saying we have
seen UFO's and even NASA has already admitted that many unidentified
objects have been captures by satellites and many astronauts and
cosmonauts have already come forward saying they have seen objects in
space - the West is looking more and more 'mind controlled' by the
puerile propaganda and this is the true facts of the case. Take your
pick, stick with the brainwashed laughter curtain or find out the truth
of what the Western government do not want you to know.


http://www.iwasabducted.com/videos.htm

nightbat wrote:

nightbat wrote

Mad Scientist wrote:

"If you ever used a telescope you know that you have to constantly
readjust the direction that it is pointing because as the earth turns
the object that the telescope is pointing at quickly moves out of view.
It was while doing this that I noticed a bright object passing slowly
overhead. I assumed it was a satellite - but I thought it would be fun
to try and point the telescope at it and take a picture. It took me a
few moments to readjust the telescope. When I finally got it pointed at
the object I was surprised to see on my LCD that through the telescope
the camera picked up quite a bit of detail. I knew then that this wasn't
an ordinary satellite. I was expecting just a fine point of light.
However the sunlight on the object indicated (to me at least) that the
object was quite high, since down on the ground it was still dark."

Mo

http://iwasabducted.com/telescopicufo.htm


nightbat

Yep Mad Scientist, it just has to be, without a doubt, our
visiting cosmic space visitors Darla and Company. Wow, it looks like
finally somebody was lucky enough to get a picture of their space ship.
How can they possibly now deny ufo visitation with this shot of her/his
space ship and actual public net confirmations of their visiting here?
Come on, are they blind and deaf, these cosmic beings want to make
official contact, not just with open minded amateur telescope viewers or
astronomy net posters, but with extremely deep mental pondering
theoretical giants like oc, Painius, Bert, Mad Scientist, Lawler,
Silverlight, Spencer, Schumacher, Benign Vanilla, Odysseus, Double-A,
spam this, Uncle Al, Greysky, DeSockpuppet, Spaceman, and a very few
select others.

Thanks for that link Mad, for you just may be making world
history, especially with the alien commander, Darla, and the rest of the
alien crew wanting Earth dialog. They wish input with only a few net
posters they find intellectual passable for their alien far advanced
state. Nightbat has established their deep affectionate ties as
confirmed by the cosmic visiting crew members due to net provided help
in saving one of their lost most valuble flight engineers in cosmic
streams and safe rescue and return.

I would like to see them doubt your research indications now,
for seeing is believing. Why anyone would name you Mad is sheer
speculation and poppycock with such authenticating photograph links of
your posting nature. Forget all those negative doubting Thomas's, for
here is the proof the world has been waiting for. Sure what more do they
need, stone tablets written on some alien elemental planet? It must have
been very difficult for you to keep your telescope lined up and steady
for all those great space ship shots. Wait, have you checked with the US
Air Force or Nato forces to be sure that it isn't an experimental secret
aircraft? Nah, they would have prevented and blanked out your net post
with link and called it a new triangle weather balloon by now.


the nightbat


If the US or NATO possessed such an experimental top secret craft which
could go into outer space and return, they certainly would not be able
to cover it up, nor would they waste money on the Space Shuttle program
(which cost billions) and nor would they waste money on the
International Space Station.

nightbat wrote

Mad Scientist wrote:

"If you ever used a telescope you know that you have to constantly
readjust the direction that it is pointing because as the earth turns
the object that the telescope is pointing at quickly moves out of view.
It was while doing this that I noticed a bright object passing slowly
overhead. I assumed it was a satellite - but I thought it would be fun
to try and point the telescope at it and take a picture. It took me a
few moments to readjust the telescope. When I finally got it pointed at
the object I was surprised to see on my LCD that through the telescope
the camera picked up quite a bit of detail. I knew then that this wasn't
an ordinary satellite. I was expecting just a fine point of light.
However the sunlight on the object indicated (to me at least) that the
object was quite high, since down on the ground it was still dark."

Mo

http://iwasabducted.com/telescopicufo.htm

nightbat

Yep Mad Scientist, it just has to be, without a doubt, our
visiting cosmic space visitors Darla and Company. Wow, it looks like
finally somebody was lucky enough to get a picture of their space ship.
How can they possibly now deny ufo visitation with this shot of her/his
space ship and actual public net confirmations of their visiting here?
Come on, are they blind and deaf, these cosmic beings want to make
official contact, not just with open minded amateur telescope viewers or
astronomy net posters, but with extremely deep mental pondering
theoretical giants like oc, Painius, Bert, Mad Scientist, Lawler,
Silverlight, Spencer, Schumacher, Benign Vanilla, Odysseus, Double-A,
spam this, Uncle Al, Greysky, DeSockpuppet, Spaceman, and a very few
select others.

Thanks for that link Mad, for you just may be making world
history, especially with the alien commander, Darla, and the rest of the
alien crew wanting Earth dialog. They wish input with only a few net
posters they find intellectual passable for their alien far advanced
state. Nightbat has established their deep affectionate ties as
confirmed by the cosmic visiting crew members due to net provided help
in saving one of their lost most valuble flight engineers in cosmic
streams and safe rescue and return.

I would like to see them doubt your research indications now,
for seeing is believing. Why anyone would name you Mad is sheer
speculation and poppycock with such authenticating photograph links of
your posting nature. Forget all those negative doubting Thomas's, for
here is the proof the world has been waiting for. Sure what more do they
need, stone tablets written on some alien elemental planet? It must have
been very difficult for you to keep your telescope lined up and steady
for all those great space ship shots. Wait, have you checked with the US
Air Force or Nato forces to be sure that it isn't an experimental secret
aircraft? Nah, they would have prevented and blanked out your net post
with link and called it a new triangle weather balloon by now.


the nightbat

please dont feed the troll

http://www.hyphenologist.co.uk/killf..._troll_faq.htm



"Mike L" wrote in message
.. .
Mad Scientist, I respect your opinions on UFO's, but you seem to be just
as
"un-objective" and biased towards your beliefs in UFO's as the scientists
you mention that are biased against it. I have an open mind and believe
they
may be real. But, I haven't seen one solid piece of evidence supporting
this, except for blurry pictures and "eyewitness" accounts that cannot be
substantiated adequately. To believe that a blurry dot is a UFO is
slightly
biased. Wouldn't you agree?

"Mad Scientist" wrote in message
et.cable.rogers.com...


Jo wrote:

In
t.cable.rogers.com,
Mad Scientist typed:

"If you ever used a telescope you know that you have to constantly
readjust the direction that it is pointing because as the earth turns
the object that the telescope is pointing at quickly moves out of
view. It was while doing this that I noticed a bright object passing
slowly overhead. I assumed it was a satellite - but I thought it
would be fun to try and point the telescope at it and take a picture.
It took me a few moments to readjust the telescope. When I finally
got it pointed at the object I was surprised to see on my LCD that
through the telescope the camera picked up quite a bit of detail. I
knew then that this wasn't an ordinary satellite. I was expecting
just a fine point of light. However the sunlight on the object
indicated (to me at least) that the object was quite high, since down
on the ground it was still dark."



Looks to me like a UFO.

A triangular object lit by sunlight that cannot be identified. And it
seems
to be flying alright. Yes, an unidentified flying object, possibly
rotating.

Fascinating...I wonder what it is?

I have no idea. That is why we call them unidentified flying object.



What has this got to do with aliens and abduction?

Joe

I don't know. I figure the author of the web site has been abducted by
aliens in their life I guess. But like is proper for true scientific
investigation - remain objective (a simple task which many 'scientists'
fail miserbly to do in the case of UFO sightings and all the video and
photographic evidence) until more information is provided.

There are way more UFO pictures on this web site, some seen by the space
program when in space and many authenticated to be real UFO pictures.

Mad Scientist wrote:

If the US or NATO possessed such an experimental top secret craft which
could go into outer space and return, they certainly would not be able
to cover it up, nor would they waste money on the Space Shuttle program
(which cost billions) and nor would they waste money on the
International Space Station.

So we're in a thread that dealt with UFO's, and you're forgetting that
when the government wanted to keep the SR-71 a secret in the early 1960s,
the CIA seeded rumors about UFOs being seen. Lots of people, to quote
Fox Mulder, "want to believe."

--
Dan Birchall, Hilo HI - http://dan.birchalls.net/ - images, words, technology