![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have stated this here in the past, but let me state it again.
My book (see below) was never intended to cover the subject topic, nor does it. I specifically *did not* cover that aspect, though some who have purchased my book have since written to me and asked my opinion about that. I have always replied that I hope my book will help stir a congressional investigation into the deaths of the crew. Early on, I referred some of them to my son Dan and his unpublished research (before he began misrepresenting my book and libeling me here in these space groups). From page 79 of my book: "A comprehensive investigation is needed into NASA's delinquent treatment of the entire IUS/cabin situation. Some additional details about the recovery of the IUS debris are therefore presented below for consideration. Because of information withheld by NASA, a more thorough treatment is beyond the scope of this book." -- John Thomas Maxson, Retired Engineer (Aerospace) Author, The Betrayal of Mission 51-L (www.mission51l.com) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"John Maxson" wrote in message
... I have stated this here in the past, but let me state it again. My book (see below) was never intended to cover the subject topic, nor does it. I specifically *did not* cover that aspect, though some who have purchased my book have since written to me and asked my opinion about that. I have always replied that I hope my book will help stir a congressional investigation into the deaths of the crew. If you never intended to cover the deaths of the crew, then you apparently missed that intent. You still have not addressed the bottom of page 80 of your book. snip From page 79 of my book: "A comprehensive investigation is needed into NASA's delinquent treatment of the entire IUS/cabin situation. Some additional details about the recovery of the IUS debris are therefore presented below for consideration. Because of information withheld by NASA, a more thorough treatment is beyond the scope of this book." You represented your own conclusions thusly in a previous post:: http://makeashorterlink.com/?D1A221455 Please scroll down to paragraph B. Just because you claim you did not cover something in your book with a caveat statement like the one above, does not mean you did not cover a topic. Your book has many caveats FWIW. -- Daniel Mount Charleston, not Charleston, SC |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Data Disparities (Columbia/Challenger Crew Survival) | John Maxson | Space Shuttle | 1 | July 18th 03 11:19 PM |
Feb 24: MSNBC : "crew survived up to a minute " | Richard Smith | Space Shuttle | 2 | July 16th 03 05:43 PM |
Crew of Columbia Survived a Minute After Last Signal - NYT | Bruce Palmer | Space Shuttle | 2 | July 16th 03 01:47 PM |
Soyuz TMA-1 crew visit | Jacques van Oene | Space Shuttle | 3 | July 9th 03 02:08 PM |
Veteran long-duration space flier to lead NASA undersea crew | Jim Kingdon | Space Shuttle | 0 | July 5th 03 09:21 PM |