![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Abdul, though they were designed for interstellar use, I don't see the
nuclear starships Orion, Daedalus and Bussard fusion craft as practical for that. I do think they would be great for interplanetary travel, building them in orbit and useing them for going to mars in a couple of weeks instead of years for colonizing it. I think chemical propulsion should just be used for shuttling parts into orbit. I think our best bet for interstellar space travel is to develop a warp drive, that is, making something that makes a well in space-time into which the ship falls, or, a ripple in space-time upon which the ship rides. They have actually worked it all out on paper. The problem, as it always is, is generating enouph energy to do it. The general concencus seems to be that we have a billion years to do it, before the sun heats up too much. When I think that my grandpa rode a horse to get where he is going and saw us go to the moon, I think that technological advancement is exponential. The rapid development in computers since the sixties seems to verify that. So we may have warp drive in under a hundred years. The more immediate problem, I think. is learning to live in harmony with nature because without it we are doomed. Nature, like the carbon dioxide/oxygen cycle, is regenerative if we don't mess it up, as we seem to be doing with global warming. That is why I think the development of fuel cells, or hydrogen powered automobiles are important. Burning fossil fuels causes global warming, and that in turn could trigger a runaway greenhouse effect or ice age. I just went off on a tangent here because it seems like we are talking about solving the world problems.-- Ian http://mysite.verizon.net/res8ydyw/ http://community.webtv.net/ianbeardsley/HomepageofIan |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The worlds first astronaut was a Chinese emperor several thousand of
years back who tied a bunch of rockets made of gun powder to a chair, strapped himself to it and lit them all. Legend has it that after the smoke cleared, there was no sign of him or his rocket. I believe that!!! He wanted to go to the stars, his heart was in the right place, but let us look at the problems with his design. There were no fins to stabilize the trajectory. Once in space there is no oxygen to allow the fuel to burn. The stars were clearly much further away than the emperor made plans for. He weighed too much to achieve escape velocity, and even if he made it into space, he didn't realize that there would have been no way to breathe. I admire him for dreaming. We have learned a lot since then, and we now know what we are up against. Recently the first Chinese astronaut to successfully go into orbit returned safely. What is man's next step towards making him depend no more on the Earth alone for his survival? --Ian http://mysite.verizon.net/res8ydyw/ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Read Arthur C. Clarkes, 2061 Odyssey Three. In it the crew aboard a ship
has to change course for a rescue mission, except they don't have enouph fuel. So they land on a comet and fill the tanks with water from it. They use the water as a propellant I believe, mass for reaction in Newton's action/reaction, if I remember correctly. The difference is this is an interplanetary ship, not interstellar, there is no mention of the Oort cloud. It seems to me you have worked the logistics in greater detail. See chapter 15 titled Car Wash. The first day they tapped into a Geyser on the comet called Old Faithful, and took in more than a thousand tons of water. It was none other than Halley's Comet. --Ian http://community.webtv.net/ianbeardsley/Logica http://mysite.verizon.net/res8ydyw/ |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Interstellar Propulsion idea using an Asteroid and a few comets! Group: sci.astro.amateur Date: Tue, Sep 7, 2004, 1:30pm From: (Ian=A0Beardsley) Read Arthur C. Clarkes, 2061 Odyssey Three. In it the crew aboard a ship has to change course for a rescue mission, except they don't have enouph fuel. So they land on a comet and fill the tanks with water from it. They use the water as a propellant I believe, mass for reaction in Newton's action/reaction, if I remember correctly. The difference is this is an interplanetary ship, not interstellar, there is no mention of the Oort cloud. It seems to me you have worked the logistics in greater detail. See chapter 15 titled Car Wash. The first day they tapped into a Geyser on the comet called Old Faithful, and took in more than a thousand tons of water. It was none other than Halley's Comet. --Ian Thinking about it, what you are talking about is a whole different ball game. You are talking about mining comets, or asteroids for fuel, Clarke speaks of collecting water for propellant (i.e. the water is not combusted or used in any kind of nuclear reaction, but is just pure mass hurled out the back end by whatever is powering the ship.) I would look into this distinction between fuel and propellant, as I am not sure I understand it very well. In anycase, I am sure you have got an original idea here. Keep up the good work.--Ian http://community.webtv.net/ianbeardsley/Logica http://mysite.verizon.net/res8ydyw/ |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Space Calendar - July 28, 2004 | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 0 | July 28th 04 05:18 PM |
Space Calendar - June 25, 2004 | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 0 | June 25th 04 04:37 PM |
Space Calendar - June 25, 2004 | Ron | Misc | 0 | June 25th 04 04:37 PM |
Space Calendar - May 28, 2004 | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 0 | May 28th 04 04:03 PM |