exoplanets in mu-Arae and now exoplanets in 55Cancri and Gliese 436

Last week I talked about the recent exoplanet discovered in mu-Arae and
put forth the question as to how many exoplanets with their data of
mass, orbit distance, orbit periodicity and other parameters, that the
question I held out was how many exoplanets and their data will it take
to dislodge and remove the Nebular Dust Cloud theory of how planets are
borne, grow and disappear into a star.

I believe the Nebular Dust Cloud theory is a piece of junk.

So how many exoplanets with their reams of data on their parameters will
it take to overthrow the Nebular Dust Cloud theory? I believe the
Growing Solar System theory is correct in that planets grow from the
cosmic rays that are shot from the nucleus of the AtomTotality what
Dirac called "new radioactivity".

The Growing Solar System theory would have the gas giants of Jupiter
Saturn as 5 billion year old planets and the inner planets of Mercury
Venus Earth Mars as 12 billion years old. The Growing Solar System
theory would say that most twin stars started out with a solo star and
as the gas giants of that solar system swallowed themselves up and
became a second star. So Jupiter Saturn Uranus and Neptune are fated or
slated in 4 billion years to be a twin star to our Sun.

So the question I have of the exoplanet hunters of Messr. Marcy and
Butler is there a "special Parameter" that exists now which can dethrone
and dismiss the Nebular Dust Cloud theory.

I can think of one special parameter right now for our own solar system
in that we find some compelling data that says Earth is twice as old as
any of the gas giants such as Jupiter. But it would be difficult to
assign age to more than one exoplanet embedded in a alien star system.
The exoplanets of 55Cancri, if I am thinking correctly, suggests there
is no means of measuring a differential age of those planets and that if
any age is ascribed would be ascribed for all of the exoplanets within
55Cancri.

So age is a parameter that can dethrone the Nebular Dust Cloud theory
but it can be only observed within our own solar system.

So I wonder if another parameter of these exoplanets can dethrone the
Nebular Dust Cloud theory. The fact that you have these huge massive
planets orbiting their stars so fast and so close in to the star itself
implies these are temporary instabilities and that the system is heading
for a swallowing up of these exoplanets. So I wonder if there is
parameter data as to twin star formation. If memory serves me that most
stars are twin stars. So I wonder if exoplanets have been found in twin
stars or if they are absent or rare?

So that in the Growing Solar System theory to have a planet of Earth
size orbiting in the manner that Earth does with the Sun is a rare
phenomenon because it is a small staging event for that solar system to
grow its second and twin star.

So I wonder if astronomers have enough exoplanets and their associated
stars and data to begin to look for a *differentiating parameter* that
casts doubts on the Nebular Dust Cloud theory and begins to shed support
and light on an alternative theory which I call the Growing Solar System
theory where planets and stars grow slowly from the constant cosmic
accumulation of cosmic rays which Dirac called "new radioactivity".

Archimedes Plutonium
www.archimedesplutonium.com
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots
of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

Thu, 02 Sep 2004 01:35:20 -0500 Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
(most snipped)


The Growing Solar System theory would have the gas giants of Jupiter
Saturn as 5 billion year old planets and the inner planets of Mercury
Venus Earth Mars as 12 billion years old. The Growing Solar System
theory would say that most twin stars started out with a solo star and
as the gas giants of that solar system swallowed themselves up and
became a second star. So Jupiter Saturn Uranus and Neptune are fated or
slated in 4 billion years to be a twin star to our Sun.

It often pays to read what one writes for the mind is already focused and
as I was rereading what I wrote some minutes ago, when I came to the above
paragraph I realized immediately what that "special parameter" was that
will dethrone the Nebular Dust Cloud theory. It is the parameter of
correlating the distances between twin stars and the distance observed by
the data of exoplanets.

If most twin stars are stars that are dissimilar to one another and whose
distance from one another is of a distance that matches the distance of
exoplanets to their parent star, then this is supporting evidence that the
dynamics of solar systems is not of the Nebular Dust Cloud theory but of a
Growing Solar System theory.

So what is the current knowledge of twin stars. Are they 90% of the star
systems? Are twin stars close to one another and barren of exoplanets? And
does the distance between twin stars correlate with the distance of these
huge gigantic exoplanets distance from their star?

Archimedes Plutonium
www.archimedesplutonium.com
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots
of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

Archimedes Plutonium wrote in message
:

Last week I talked about the recent exoplanet discovered in mu-Arae and
put forth the question as to how many exoplanets with their data of
mass, orbit distance, orbit periodicity and other parameters, that the
question I held out was how many exoplanets and their data will it take
to dislodge and remove the Nebular Dust Cloud theory of how planets are
borne, grow and disappear into a star.

I believe the Nebular Dust Cloud theory is a piece of junk.

I believe that you are a ****ing idiot.

So how many exoplanets with their reams of data on their parameters will
it take to overthrow the Nebular Dust Cloud theory? I believe the
Growing Solar System theory is correct in that planets grow from the
cosmic rays that are shot from the nucleus of the AtomTotality what
Dirac called "new radioactivity".

The Growing Solar System theory would have the gas giants of Jupiter
Saturn as 5 billion year old planets and the inner planets of Mercury
Venus Earth Mars as 12 billion years old. The Growing Solar System
theory would say

a large amount of incoherent bull****.