A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Dan Akroyd Speaks About NASA UFO's



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 2nd 04, 08:31 AM
Mad Scientist
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Dan Akroyd Speaks About NASA UFO's

Like fifty percent of the North American populace (according to a Harris
Upham poll), I have long believed in the reality of technically advanced
craft with capabilities in speed and maneuverability far beyond any
achieved by our aerospace manufacturers to date.

Roswell, Kecksburg, the last words of Captain Mantell, the account of
Nebraska highway patrolman Herb Schirmer, the stories of Barney and
Betty Hill, Travis Walton, Linda Cortile, and the Pascagoula and Alagash
incidents are well known to millions of people.

When this subject is discussed in my presence, people often say to me,
"Dan, these are anecdotes! Where are the pictures, film, and videotape
evidence?"

In fact, there are hundreds of thousands of such anecdotes (see the
Laurence Rockefeller-funded report), thousands of hours of professional
and home video (the Japanese Nippon TV footage of Area 51), and film
dating from as early as the 1950s.

Dr. Roger Leir has made his life work the extraction and analysis of
implanted objects from people who share the abduction experiences which
have been catalogued by Bud Hopkins and Dr. John Mack.

In my view and in that of millions like me, there is no question as to
the existence in multiple of these advanced machines and in diverse
forms-discs, crosses, wedges, triangles, boomerangs, cigars, and their
respective occupants in various manifestations-greys, blues, humanoids,
reptilians, and Mothmen, etc. The question is not whether they exist but
rather are some of them here to do our species harm or good?

Mo
http://www.xfacts.com/dan/

--
Usenet is filled with abusive and obsessive-compulsive-sociopathic personality disorder sufferers which makes it all the more easily ignored, dismissed and ridiculed.


  #2  
Old September 2nd 04, 08:46 AM
Wally Anglesea
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Mad Scientist" wrote in message
.cable.rogers.com...
Like fifty percent of the North American populace (according to a Harris
Upham poll), I have long believed in the reality of technically advanced
craft with capabilities in speed and maneuverability far beyond any achieved
by our aerospace manufacturers to date.


Wow, Dan Ackroyd?? Must be true then. I mean how could you doubt Dan? Not
only that, a poll on what people beleive must equal fact!!!!

Come on, MS, you can do better.

Why post HTML, by the way? Have you learned something from Danny Min?
What's the matter, you can't be original?


  #3  
Old September 2nd 04, 10:56 AM
nightbat
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

nightbat wrote

Mad Scientist wrote:

Like fifty percent of the North American populace (according to a
Harris Upham poll), I have long believed in the reality of technically
advanced craft with capabilities in speed and maneuverability far
beyond any achieved by our aerospace manufacturers to date.

Roswell, Kecksburg, the last words of Captain Mantell, the account of
Nebraska highway patrolman Herb Schirmer, the stories of Barney and
Betty Hill, Travis Walton, Linda Cortile, and the Pascagoula and
Alagash incidents are well known to millions of people.

When this subject is discussed in my presence, people often say to me,
"Dan, these are anecdotes! Where are the pictures, film, and videotape
evidence?"

In fact, there are hundreds of thousands of such anecdotes (see the
Laurence Rockefeller-funded report), thousands of hours of
professional and home video (the Japanese Nippon TV footage of Area
51), and film dating from as early as the 1950s.

Dr. Roger Leir has made his life work the extraction and analysis of
implanted objects from people who share the abduction experiences
which have been catalogued by Bud Hopkins and Dr. John Mack.

In my view and in that of millions like me, there is no question as to
the existence in multiple of these advanced machines and in diverse
forms-discs, crosses, wedges, triangles, boomerangs, cigars, and their
respective occupants in various manifestations-greys, blues,
humanoids, reptilians, and Mothmen, etc. The question is not whether
they exist but rather are some of them here to do our species harm or
good?

Mo
http://www.xfacts.com/dan/

--
Usenet is filled with abusive and obsessive-compulsive-sociopathic
personality disorder sufferers which makes it all the more easily
ignored, dismissed and ridiculed.


nightbat

Perhaps Questioning Scientist, that just the fact that Nasa
chose to no longer permit and now routinely restricts the live filming
of outer space missions or walks is an unsettling pointing indication.
What is going on in the background behind the real time filmed astronaut
that no longer is permitted to be viewed by the general public? If they
are just floating or fast traveling space ice crystals or ejected
previous space mission debris as claimed, why is it that some of those
earlier shown film footage and pics of background particles or objects
show or indicate quick unexplained change of direction? Nothing to hide
or to be kept secret then why the restriction in permitted live viewing
over now Nasa much preferred simulated outer space scenes? A better
simpler more appropriate reason or excuse would be to prevent the public
general viewing of unexpected outer space accident and to protect
remaining down on Earth astronaut family members. Then again, could be
all the rubber necking of the mission male astronauts trying to get a
good view of our cosmic Darla and alien investigating sub mother space
craft.


the nightbat

  #4  
Old September 2nd 04, 02:45 PM
Jay Windley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Wally Anglesea" wrote in message
...
|
| Wow, Dan Ackroyd?? Must be true then.

Fallacy of endorsement, or "argumentum ad verecundiam". You're right; just
because Mr. Aykdroyd is a celebrity and therefore commands attention doesn't
necessarily mean he is any better informed or better experienced than some
randomly chosen individual.

| Come on, MS, you can do better.

Um, no he can't.

--
|
The universe is not required to conform | Jay Windley
to the expectations of the ignorant. | webmaster @ clavius.org

  #5  
Old September 2nd 04, 02:49 PM
Benign Vanilla
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Mad Scientist" wrote in message
.cable.rogers.com...

UFO drivel snipped

The home page is cool.

BV.


  #6  
Old September 3rd 04, 04:53 AM
spam this
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Wally Anglesea" wrote in message
...

"Mad Scientist" wrote in message
.cable.rogers.com...


I am not so sure MS is offering this as substantiation or holding out Dan
Akroyd as an authotity. after all, Mr. Ackroyd can believe whatever he
wants, and is free to offer his opinion if asked.

Although I do not share the belief of alien visitors, I am a big Dan Akroyd
fan, Anybody who promotes blues music is on the right track, at least when
it comes to music.

chuck


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Selected Restricted NASA Videotapes Michael Ravnitzky Space Station 5 January 16th 04 04:28 PM
NASA Selects Explorer Mission Proposals For Feasibility Studies Ron Baalke Science 0 November 4th 03 10:14 PM
NASA Celebrates Educational Benefits of Earth Science Week Ron Baalke Science 0 October 10th 03 04:14 PM
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide Steven S. Pietrobon Space Shuttle 0 September 12th 03 01:37 AM
NASA Releases Near-Earth Object Search Report Ron Baalke Misc 0 September 10th 03 04:39 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.