A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Space Shuttle
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

A question about non-tethered EVA risk.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 6th 03, 07:15 AM
Sal Bruno
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default A question about non-tethered EVA risk.

It has been stated that there are no guidelines or plans with respect
to an 'over-the-side' or non-tethered EVA to inspect the RCC leading
edge.

But, given the ability of the Shuttle to very accurately manouvre
itself, is an unthethered EVA really that much more dangerous than a
regular EVA as it would seem?

If an untethered astronaut were in the payload bay, could not the
Shuttle handle navigating downwards, then backwards, then leftwards,
then upwards, allowing close observation? And then performing these
navigations in reverse, having the astronaut come back in contact with
the payload bay?

The concept of untethered EVA sound distressingly risky, but unless
the Shuttle suffered a navigational thruster failure, it would
essentially be no more complicated than an ISS docking, would it not?

Thanks.
  #2  
Old July 6th 03, 10:44 AM
Brian Gaff
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default A question about non-tethered EVA risk.

Re disorientation, could the underside be painted with a cross hatch with
co-ordinates on it to aid this problem?

Brian

--
Brian Gaff....
graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them
Email:
__________________________________________________ __________________________
__________________________________






---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (
http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.495 / Virus Database: 294 - Release Date: 30/06/03


  #3  
Old July 6th 03, 02:27 PM
Andrew Gray
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default A question about non-tethered EVA risk.

In article , Brian Gaff wrote:
Re disorientation, could the underside be painted with a cross hatch with
co-ordinates on it to aid this problem?


Offhand guess: you'd really not want to do that, as the paint could
cause nontrivial problems on re-entry, when it starts flaking and
potentially contributing to abrading or thermally damaging the TPS,
plus any subsequent (probably minor) aerodynamic effects.

--
-Andrew Gray

  #4  
Old July 6th 03, 05:46 PM
Kegwasher
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default A question about non-tethered EVA risk.

Andrew Gray wrote:

In article , Brian Gaff wrote:
Re disorientation, could the underside be painted with a cross hatch with
co-ordinates on it to aid this problem?


Offhand guess: you'd really not want to do that, as the paint could
cause nontrivial problems on re-entry, when it starts flaking and
potentially contributing to abrading or thermally damaging the TPS,
plus any subsequent (probably minor) aerodynamic effects.

What about the stuff between the tiles? Could that be a different colour
than the tiles?
  #5  
Old July 6th 03, 06:55 PM
OM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default A question about non-tethered EVA risk.

On Sun, 06 Jul 2003 18:46:38 +0200, Kegwasher
wrote:

Andrew Gray wrote:

In article , Brian Gaff wrote:
Re disorientation, could the underside be painted with a cross hatch with
co-ordinates on it to aid this problem?


Offhand guess: you'd really not want to do that, as the paint could
cause nontrivial problems on re-entry, when it starts flaking and
potentially contributing to abrading or thermally damaging the TPS,
plus any subsequent (probably minor) aerodynamic effects.

What about the stuff between the tiles? Could that be a different colour
than the tiles?


....Oh hell, just color code the tiles different shades of black :-)


OM

--

"No ******* ever won a war by dying for | http://www.io.com/~o_m
his country. He won it by making the other | Sergeant-At-Arms
poor dumb ******* die for his country." | Human O-Ring Society

- General George S. Patton, Jr
  #6  
Old July 7th 03, 07:17 PM
Kegwasher
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default A question about non-tethered EVA risk.

OM wrote:

On Sun, 06 Jul 2003 18:46:38 +0200, Kegwasher
wrote:

Andrew Gray wrote:

In article , Brian Gaff wrote:
Re disorientation, could the underside be painted with a cross hatch
with co-ordinates on it to aid this problem?

Offhand guess: you'd really not want to do that, as the paint could
cause nontrivial problems on re-entry, when it starts flaking and
potentially contributing to abrading or thermally damaging the TPS,
plus any subsequent (probably minor) aerodynamic effects.

What about the stuff between the tiles? Could that be a different colour
than the tiles?


...Oh hell, just color code the tiles different shades of black :-)


OM

I see a red door and I want it painted black
No colours anymore, I want them to turn black

sorry, could not resist.


  #7  
Old July 8th 03, 02:48 AM
Jorge R. Frank
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default A question about non-tethered EVA risk.

Kegwasher wrote in
:

OM wrote:

On Sun, 06 Jul 2003 18:46:38 +0200, Kegwasher
wrote:

Andrew Gray wrote:

In article , Brian Gaff
wrote:
Re disorientation, could the underside be painted with a cross
hatch with co-ordinates on it to aid this problem?

Offhand guess: you'd really not want to do that, as the paint could
cause nontrivial problems on re-entry, when it starts flaking and
potentially contributing to abrading or thermally damaging the TPS,
plus any subsequent (probably minor) aerodynamic effects.

What about the stuff between the tiles? Could that be a different
colour than the tiles?


...Oh hell, just color code the tiles different shades of black :-)

I see a red door and I want it painted black
No colours anymore, I want them to turn black

sorry, could not resist.


No need for apologies, but I may need to after this one:

"It's the wild color scheme that freaks me. Every time you try to operate
one of these weird black controls that are labeled in black on a black
background, a little black light lights up black to let you know you've
done it. What is this? Some kind of galactic cyberhearse?"

"Perhaps whoever designed it had eyes that responded to different
wavelengths."

"Or didn't have much imagination."

"Perhaps he was feeling very depressed."

--
JRF

Reply-to address spam-proofed - to reply by E-mail,
check "Organization" (I am not assimilated) and
think one step ahead of IBM.
  #9  
Old July 8th 03, 08:09 AM
LooseChanj
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default A question about non-tethered EVA risk.

On or about 08 Jul 2003 05:57:15 GMT, Jorge R. Frank
made the sensational claim that:
"Something about this, that, that's so black, it's like, how much more
black could this be, and the answer is, none, none more black."


Well I think it's depressing, it looks like death.
--
This is a siggy | To E-mail, do note | This space is for rent
It's properly formatted | who you mean to reply-to | Inquire within if you
No person, none, care | and it will reach me | Would like your ad here

  #10  
Old July 9th 03, 01:52 AM
Terrell Miller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default A question about non-tethered EVA risk.

"Jorge R. Frank" wrote in message
...

"Perhaps whoever designed it had eyes that responded to different
wavelengths."

"Or didn't have much imagination."

"Perhaps he was feeling very depressed."


"I wait in this place
Where the sun never shines
I wait in this place
Where the shadows run from themselves"

--
Terrell Miller


"We pay for love, but the hate comes free"
-Gordon Sumner



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Telescope Question Niko Holm Space Science Misc 6 December 13th 03 03:38 PM
Another book question Andrew Gray Space Science Misc 3 November 6th 03 06:34 PM
PRA - Public's Risk Assessment on Safety Andrew Gray Space Science Misc 15 August 26th 03 11:25 PM
Question: Soyuz Descent Module Landing System John Pelchat Space Science Misc 3 August 22nd 03 08:30 AM
To fly or not to fly? That is the question... Brian Gaff Space Shuttle 2 July 5th 03 07:47 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.