![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sorry somewhat OT but Bob Mizon [CfDS] at Ewell AS earlier this month
said that "some astronomers have 500W security lamps on their houses - half the maximum power of lighthouses" - surely both statements can't be right? Do you offend in the first part !! Well the latter seems true - Portland Bill Lighthouse has a modest 1kW lamp visible to mariners at 20+ miles - see my page http://home.freeuk.com/m.gavin/ntrust.htm and a remarkable 'thin' fresnel lens to project the horizontal beam. The lighthouseman present implied the fresnel lens had reflective qualities to capture the backbeam [like the mirror in a slide projector] which seems pointless. Have I missunderstood? Can anyone knowledgeable in lighthouse fresnels advise? A web search didn't help. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Maurice Gavin
writes The lighthouseman present implied the fresnel lens had reflective qualities to capture the backbeam [like the mirror in a slide projector] which seems pointless. Have I missunderstood? Can anyone knowledgeable in lighthouse fresnels advise? A web search didn't help. Portland Bill appears to be equipped with a '4 panel 1st order catadioptric fixed lens' arrangement. http://www.trinityhouse.co.uk/html/ts46.htm From what I've read, it looks as though the 'catadioptric' part refers way in which the outer part of the lens uses total internal reflection to direct the light, as opposed to the inner dioptric portion, that directs the light by refraction. So, the lens does indeed reflect some light. Diagram and details he http://www.lanternroom.com/misc/freslens.htm The above may only be part of the story though. As the lenses are fixed, there must be another rotating part, presumably incorporating a reflector inside the lenses. -- David Entwistle |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 17:16:58 +0100, David Entwistle
wrote: Portland Bill appears to be equipped with a '4 panel 1st order catadioptric fixed lens' arrangement. http://www.trinityhouse.co.uk/html/ts46.htm From what I've read, it looks as though the 'catadioptric' part refers way in which the outer part of the lens uses total internal reflection to direct the light, as opposed to the inner dioptric portion, that directs the light by refraction. So, the lens does indeed reflect some light. Diagram and details he http://www.lanternroom.com/misc/freslens.htm Thanks David - all is now clear from the fresnel diagram. The outer zone of the fresnel acts as an internal reflector - the inner zone as a refractor - all projecting a forward horizontal beam. The complete system must be ~ f/0.7 eg very fast. The whole fresnel lens rotates on a turntable. An identical fresnel on the 'reverse' side projects an identical beam 180o to the first. The above may only be part of the story though. As the lenses are fixed, there must be another rotating part, presumably incorporating a reflector inside the lenses. Only the lamp is fixed. David Entwistle |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
So what happened to this lens grinding machine?? | Richard | Amateur Astronomy | 10 | March 11th 04 05:45 PM |
Tele Vue 76 flip-up lens cap? | Florian | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | March 1st 04 01:35 PM |
Apo Lens Re-centering tools | optidud | Amateur Astronomy | 19 | July 25th 03 07:58 AM |
Prism Diagonal Anti Chromatic Aberration Effect? | optidud | Amateur Astronomy | 12 | July 18th 03 04:25 AM |