![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
And it was ....... 'Saturn'...
Here's a brief report of a rathy shaky start to my observational life! Weather was bad, a lot of stars around the horizon were fuzzy because of the very high cloud, but there was a 'window' of clearer sky directly above, and about halfway down the sky. I'd had my new lens and barlow, so I thought what the hell... Straight up to the PC to look for Jupiter on Cartes du Ceil, but saw that it was well down the sky, so - on to Saturn. Yes - in Gemini, and close to a recognisable feature, so should be easy enough to find. Down to the garage, out with the scope, over the dustbin, onto the rear patio. No time for polar alignment - I decided to just wing it, and hop to where it should be. Set the scope down - took a step back, and - hey - that finderscope shouldn't be pointing that way??? It was about 15 degrees right if the way the scope was pointing!! No doubt done by me during the trip over the dustbin... Damn. So - with the weather failing, I straightened it up by hand, and pointed at the bright object around about where I though saturn was. The finders red dot was bang on - and when I looked through the scope - that was bang on too - I'd got it exactly right by hand!!! So anyway - I had the 23x eypiece in and it looked just like a bright dot, but somehow different. Up to the 50x, focus, and hey - that doesn't look like a star - it's not the right shape... I was getting excited now... OK - time for the barlow, to give me 100x, focus, and there she was - small, white, but THERE, rings and all. I just stood there - keeping it centered as best I could. I tried the 125x 4mm lens, and the picture was not much better, just harded to see because of the tiny hole. And the 250x was a definite no go, as was expected. I think I really need a 6mm to give me 160x views. So thats it - I'm really chuffed with myself, but at the same time a wee bit disappointed that it was so small, and so white. A couple of questions to round off. 100x and 125x was basically the same which I was a disturbed by - will 160x be that much bigger? What x do you have to go up to to see any detail on saturn and jupiter for my 114m Newt? I'm assuming that even if it's perfect seeing, object don't get physicall BIGGER in the eypiece do they, just clearer? Congrats if you've got to the end of this ramble.. CandT |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Orbital Mechanics | JOE HECHT | Space Shuttle | 7 | July 21st 04 09:27 PM |
Sedna, space probes?, colonies? what's next? | TKalbfus | Policy | 265 | July 13th 04 12:00 AM |
ANN: New Version of Deepsky Software (DAS) | Deepsky Astronomy Software | Astronomy Misc | 0 | June 3rd 04 11:44 PM |
Real and Virtual images | John Honan | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | September 21st 03 03:31 AM |