![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi all,
Sorry if I annoy, but on Australian TV news I have just watched a segment on the rings of Saturn. We had the usual pic of a huge Saturn and it's rings, and, in FRONT, a pic of the Cas. probe that took the pics. What annoys is that time after time we see a pic or animation of the probe responsible in front of the object of interest. This for me totally destroyes credibility as I know that this picture/video could not have been taken, thus is a fake, or at least, the foreground probe is a fake. Why do they do it? Why not just show the bloody pic! Eddie |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I did wonder how the cameraman got there to take a picture of the probe.
"Eddie" wrote in message ... Hi all, Sorry if I annoy, but on Australian TV news I have just watched a segment on the rings of Saturn. We had the usual pic of a huge Saturn and it's rings, and, in FRONT, a pic of the Cas. probe that took the pics. What annoys is that time after time we see a pic or animation of the probe responsible in front of the object of interest. This for me totally destroyes credibility as I know that this picture/video could not have been taken, thus is a fake, or at least, the foreground probe is a fake. Why do they do it? Why not just show the bloody pic! Eddie |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I did wonder how the cameraman got there to take a picture of the probe.
"Eddie" wrote in message ... Hi all, Sorry if I annoy, but on Australian TV news I have just watched a segment on the rings of Saturn. We had the usual pic of a huge Saturn and it's rings, and, in FRONT, a pic of the Cas. probe that took the pics. What annoys is that time after time we see a pic or animation of the probe responsible in front of the object of interest. This for me totally destroyes credibility as I know that this picture/video could not have been taken, thus is a fake, or at least, the foreground probe is a fake. Why do they do it? Why not just show the bloody pic! Eddie |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Eddie Do you think NASA is doing a little "fudging"? I lived with
my aunt as a kid,and she like you use the term "bloody" She liked calling me a "bloody fool" Bert |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Eddie Do you think NASA is doing a little "fudging"? I lived with
my aunt as a kid,and she like you use the term "bloody" She liked calling me a "bloody fool" Bert |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Eddie" wrote in message ... Hi all, Sorry if I annoy, but on Australian TV news I have just watched a segment on the rings of Saturn. We had the usual pic of a huge Saturn and it's rings, and, in FRONT, a pic of the Cas. probe that took the pics. What annoys is that time after time we see a pic or animation of the probe responsible in front of the object of interest. This for me totally destroyes credibility as I know that this picture/video could not have been taken, thus is a fake, or at least, the foreground probe is a fake. Why do they do it? Why not just show the bloody pic! The companies that do the simulations have a foothold. It's the same with current movies. Thy are tailor made for Special effects producers, thereby making big bucks for them. It's not only space segments which are 'sexed up' in the manner you describe. For instance, I've never seen TV footage of whales cavorting in the ocean without recourse to slow motion footage. This occurs to exaggerate the size of the animal. Merv. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Eddie" wrote in message ... Hi all, Sorry if I annoy, but on Australian TV news I have just watched a segment on the rings of Saturn. We had the usual pic of a huge Saturn and it's rings, and, in FRONT, a pic of the Cas. probe that took the pics. What annoys is that time after time we see a pic or animation of the probe responsible in front of the object of interest. This for me totally destroyes credibility as I know that this picture/video could not have been taken, thus is a fake, or at least, the foreground probe is a fake. Why do they do it? Why not just show the bloody pic! The companies that do the simulations have a foothold. It's the same with current movies. Thy are tailor made for Special effects producers, thereby making big bucks for them. It's not only space segments which are 'sexed up' in the manner you describe. For instance, I've never seen TV footage of whales cavorting in the ocean without recourse to slow motion footage. This occurs to exaggerate the size of the animal. Merv. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
producers, thereby making big bucks for them.
It's not only space segments which are 'sexed up' in the manner you describe. For instance, I've never seen TV footage of whales cavorting in the ocean without recourse to slow motion footage. This occurs to exaggerate the size of the animal. Merv. Not forgetting the telephoto focal length which accentuates the whole thing. Eddie |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
producers, thereby making big bucks for them.
It's not only space segments which are 'sexed up' in the manner you describe. For instance, I've never seen TV footage of whales cavorting in the ocean without recourse to slow motion footage. This occurs to exaggerate the size of the animal. Merv. Not forgetting the telephoto focal length which accentuates the whole thing. Eddie |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 9 Jul 2004 18:40:08 +0800, "Eddie"
wrote: Hi all, Sorry if I annoy, but on Australian TV news I have just watched a segment on the rings of Saturn. We had the usual pic of a huge Saturn and it's rings, and, in FRONT, a pic of the Cas. probe that took the pics. What annoys is that time after time we see a pic or animation of the probe responsible in front of the object of interest. This for me totally destroyes credibility as I know that this picture/video could not have been taken, thus is a fake, or at least, the foreground probe is a fake. Why do they do it? Why not just show the bloody pic! Eddie Because that's what most people ( ie those who knows nothing about astronomy ) wants to see. If you are really that annoyed, then you surely not watch tv series like StarTrek! Here we have the Enterprise right in the middle of nowhere illuminated by... something (there are no nearby stars) making a kind of deep engine noise (no air to transmit the sound) etc... Stanley Kubrick got it almost right in "2001, a space odyssey". There, Discovery makes no noise while travelling to Saturn but there is a whole orchestra floating in space nearby because we can hear the music!!! Have a good night! Benoît... |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
They done it! They done it! Damned if they ain't flew! | Scott Lowther | History | 6 | December 20th 03 11:02 PM |
They done it! They done it! Damned if they ain't flew! | Rusty B | History | 1 | December 18th 03 06:47 AM |
Your damned if you do and your damned if you don't. | Chef! | UK Astronomy | 31 | November 15th 03 01:24 AM |