![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
How many sun like stars are in this galaxy -- on average?
Thx alan |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"aquablue" wrote in message
... How many sun like stars are in this galaxy -- on average? Since we only have one galaxy, I'm not sure what you mean by "on average," but I'm going to venture a hypothesis here that in any event we really don't know. Heck, you can't even get a straight number from the experts for the number of stars (of any sort) in our galaxy. I suspect a lot of this has to do with the fact that we can't see most of our galaxy (i.e., everything at the galactic core and beyond) due to the obscuring dust clouds. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
the reason I ask is: marcy says that she estimates that 12% of sun like
stars would have a similar solar system arangement to ours -- thus may have capacity for earth like planets harboring life. "Kilolani" wrote in message ink.net... "aquablue" wrote in message ... How many sun like stars are in this galaxy -- on average? Since we only have one galaxy, I'm not sure what you mean by "on average," but I'm going to venture a hypothesis here that in any event we really don't know. Heck, you can't even get a straight number from the experts for the number of stars (of any sort) in our galaxy. I suspect a lot of this has to do with the fact that we can't see most of our galaxy (i.e., everything at the galactic core and beyond) due to the obscuring dust clouds. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"aquablue" wrote in message ...
the reason I ask is: marcy says that she estimates that 12% of sun like stars would have a similar solar system arangement to ours -- thus may have capacity for earth like planets harboring life. That's about right, according to all the estimates I've seen (which have ranged from 10-12%). The percentage may be higher because large portions of the Milky Way are blocked from our view, and because we currently have somewhat myopic definitions of "sun-like stars" and "earth-like planets". Rick |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"aquablue" wrote in message ...
How many sun like stars are in this galaxy -- on average? Thx alan I assume you mean "at a guess". The galaxy has roughly a hundred billion stars. (All these numbers could be off by a factor of 2 or so. Take with a grain of salt.) You'd have to define what's meant by "sun-like star". The number of F, G, K main sequence non-multiple-system stars that are between .75 and 1.25 solar masses is probably something like two percent of the stars in the galaxy. So roughly a billion, give or take. It's much more likely to be 10^9 than 10^10 or 10^8, anyway. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
pity--so few... that sucks for chances of life
"eyelessgame" wrote in message om... "aquablue" wrote in message ... How many sun like stars are in this galaxy -- on average? Thx alan I assume you mean "at a guess". The galaxy has roughly a hundred billion stars. (All these numbers could be off by a factor of 2 or so. Take with a grain of salt.) You'd have to define what's meant by "sun-like star". The number of F, G, K main sequence non-multiple-system stars that are between .75 and 1.25 solar masses is probably something like two percent of the stars in the galaxy. So roughly a billion, give or take. It's much more likely to be 10^9 than 10^10 or 10^8, anyway. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"aquablue" wrote in message ...
pity--so few... that sucks for chances of life "eyelessgame" wrote in message om... "aquablue" wrote in message ... How many sun like stars are in this galaxy -- on average? Thx alan I assume you mean "at a guess". The galaxy has roughly a hundred billion stars. (All these numbers could be off by a factor of 2 or so. Take with a grain of salt.) You'd have to define what's meant by "sun-like star". The number of F, G, K main sequence non-multiple-system stars that are between .75 and 1.25 solar masses is probably something like two percent of the stars in the galaxy. So roughly a billion, give or take. It's much more likely to be 10^9 than 10^10 or 10^8, anyway. A multiple-star system does not preclude the existence of Earth-like planets, it just makes the existence of Earth-like planets a little less probable (and we're not even sure about that much!). Some believe our own sun is part of a multiple-star system with Alpha Centauri. Rick |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
aquablue wrote:
pity--so few... that sucks for chances of life Well, multiply that by 100 billion...the approximate number of galaxies and the prospects improve... Paul |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Rick
writes "aquablue" wrote in message ... You'd have to define what's meant by "sun-like star". The number of F, G, K main sequence non-multiple-system stars that are between .75 and 1.25 solar masses is probably something like two percent of the stars in the galaxy. So roughly a billion, give or take. It's much more likely to be 10^9 than 10^10 or 10^8, anyway. A multiple-star system does not preclude the existence of Earth-like planets, it just makes the existence of Earth-like planets a little less probable (and we're not even sure about that much!). Some believe our own sun is part of a multiple-star system with Alpha Centauri. How so? It's four light years away. On that basis _every_ star is part of a multiple star system, because they are about that far apart. -- Save the Hubble Space Telescope! Remove spam and invalid from address to reply. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jonathan Silverlight" wrote in message ...
In message , Rick writes "aquablue" wrote in message ... You'd have to define what's meant by "sun-like star". The number of F, G, K main sequence non-multiple-system stars that are between .75 and 1.25 solar masses is probably something like two percent of the stars in the galaxy. So roughly a billion, give or take. It's much more likely to be 10^9 than 10^10 or 10^8, anyway. A multiple-star system does not preclude the existence of Earth-like planets, it just makes the existence of Earth-like planets a little less probable (and we're not even sure about that much!). Some believe our own sun is part of a multiple-star system with Alpha Centauri. How so? It's four light years away. On that basis _every_ star is part of a multiple star system, because they are about that far apart. From what I've read, some astronomers believe our sun and the Alpha Centauri system revolve around each other. That would make our sun part of a multiple star system, technically if not practically. Rick |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AMBER ALPHA STAR CESAM stellar model | harlod caufield | Space Shuttle | 0 | December 27th 03 08:12 PM |
Astronomers find nearest galaxy to the Milky Way (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | November 7th 03 02:30 PM |
[obs] Lucy looks Skywards 23/09/2003 | Morgoth | UK Astronomy | 1 | September 29th 03 02:39 AM |
Stars Rich In Heavy Metals Tend To Harbor Planets, Astronomers Report | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | July 21st 03 06:10 PM |
Whats in the sky today | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | July 14th 03 04:24 AM |