![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dear All,
I've just picked up a 2nd hand Nexstar 8i and want to compare the optics/image quality with that of my ETX90 as quick as possible. With the cloudy weather I've resorted to terrestrial viewing but immediately noticed that the ETX90 produced a sharper picture. I'm not sure I approached the test correctly however as both scopes where indoors and both used a 26mm Plossel and as such perhaps I had unfairly hampered the larger Nexstar? Although the Nexstar 8i was obviously producing a higher magnified image I had expected it to be able to produce one just as sharp image? With the object not being more that 150+ metres perhaps it was simply too close? In short, yes it appeared clear but not razour sharp? Is this due to the additional magnification x78 comapred with x48? Perhaps the larger scope doesn't work well indoors compared to the littel ETX? Can any one explain to me a simple method of testing the optics? I have a limited amount of time to confirm I'm happy with the scope and will need to test ASAP probably as noted under terrestrial conditions due to the weather. Many thanks, Mike |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mike Cutts" wrote in message ...
Dear All, I've just picked up a 2nd hand Nexstar 8i and want to compare the optics/image quality with that of my ETX90 as quickly as possible. With the cloudy weather I've resorted to terrestrial viewing but immediately noticed that the ETX90 produced a sharper picture. I'm not sure I approached the test correctly however as both scopes were indoors and both used a 26mm Plossl and as such perhaps I had unfairly hampered the larger Nexstar? Although the Nexstar 8i was obviously producing a higher magnified image I had expected it to be able to produce one just as sharp image? With the object not being more that 150+ metres perhaps it was simply too close? In short, yes it appeared clear but not razour sharp? Is this due to the additional magnification x78 comapred with x48? Perhaps the larger scope doesn't work well indoors compared to the littel ETX? Can any one explain to me a simple method of testing the optics? I have a limited amount of time to confirm I'm happy with the scope and will need to test ASAP probably as noted under terrestrial conditions due to the weather. Many thanks, Mike Since nobody ese is having a go at this one: At the very least you should attempt to match the magnification between the two instruments. You have nearly a 2-1 ratio between the powers. Don't expect anything at all from looking through a window. With the window closed you are at the mercy of (possibly two layers) of mass procuced glass between you and the object being viewed. With the window open the indoor heat floods out through the open gap killing the view stone dead. According to amateur astronomer superstition. The sky is only cloudy because you are considering another instrument. So you have only yourself to blame! ;-) Ask the seller for more time until the sky clears and match those powers nearer to 100-120x for a more informed comparison. If the seller is in a hurry then simply offer the 8i back. There is really no substitute for testing on real astronomical objects in the night sky. The moment you get a clear night you shouldn't even need a comparison. The telescope will either perform and delight you. Or, it will not. Chris.B |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Your ETX is not user collimatable, and does not
normally need it. The Nexstar is collimatable and will require checking reasonably often for optimum views. It may well be that collimation is off slightly. Adam -- Eschew obfuscation. Eliminate such idiom previous to rejoining. "Chris.B" wrote in message om... "Mike Cutts" wrote in message ... Dear All, I've just picked up a 2nd hand Nexstar 8i and want to compare the optics/image quality with that of my ETX90 as quickly as possible. With the cloudy weather I've resorted to terrestrial viewing but immediately noticed that the ETX90 produced a sharper picture. I'm not sure I approached the Since nobody ese is having a go at this one: At the very least you should attempt to match the magnification between the two instruments. You have nearly a 2-1 ratio between the powers. Don't expect anything at all from looking through a window. With the window closed you are at the mercy of (possibly two layers) of mass procuced glass between you and the object being viewed. With the window open the indoor heat floods out through the open gap killing the view stone dead. Chris.B |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Engineers test the first engine for NASA's return to flight mission | Jacques van Oene | Space Shuttle | 1 | July 19th 04 06:45 PM |
ATK Conducts Successful Full-Scale Space Shuttle Motor Test | Jacques van Oene | Space Shuttle | 0 | June 11th 04 03:53 PM |
Successful test leads way for safer Shuttle solid rocket motor | Jacques van Oene | Space Shuttle | 0 | June 11th 04 03:50 PM |
Bechtel Nevada: Control of the World's Largest Nuclear Weapons Facilities | * | Astronomy Misc | 0 | May 2nd 04 05:29 PM |
Humans, Robots Work Together To Test 'Spacewalk Squad' Concept | Ron Baalke | Space Station | 0 | July 2nd 03 04:15 PM |