![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Since so much time and money is spent into getting people BACK to earth,
aren't there people who would volunteer to never come back? There are so many of us on the planet, and I'm sure there would be people who would be willing to go through the training etc and know that they'll never return. I'd go if there was a chance I could see Mars with my own eyes and maybe even land on it. Better then being wiped out in a car accident. What do you think? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Mantra wrote: Since so much time and money is spent into getting people BACK to earth, aren't there people who would volunteer to never come back? There are so many of us on the planet, and I'm sure there would be people who would be willing to go through the training etc and know that they'll never return. Maybe we aren't looking at this in the right way....maybe we could send people there who we _don't want_ to come back....Geraldo Rivera for instance- he could make his last great TV appearance from there.... I'd go if there was a chance I could see Mars with my own eyes and maybe even land on it. Better then being wiped out in a car accident. What do you think? I think you had better bring a cute, personality-filled monkey along if you want to have any chance of finding water there...just ask Christopher Draper. Monkeys, as usual, are the key to successful space exploration. Pat Mars Gravity Probe 1 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I like the one-way first Mars travel idea, except for details. I do
think this is a very serious option -- serious like an old Celtic story of a race to claim an island: two ships, neck-and-neck; one contestant cut off his hand and threw it onto the island before the opposition got there. It was then generally agreed, his ship won. If we sent off a one-way ship, I can't see how the survival odds for the travellers would be very good, despite the most careful engineering. Never forget Murphy's Law. But if a base there were desperately needed, I can see doing something like that. In fact, I think a base there *is* desperately needed, if only that could be discerned from Washington DC. ...Have you compared the amount of money the Iraq adventure will cost us, vs, the cost of serious Lunar and Mars exploration? Cheers -- Martha Adams |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Mantra wrote: How about a bunch of glorified monkeys? Then the water-seeking monkey can boss them around and have a REAL reality show. Lots of people would watch a show where people are shot into space, never to return. See how long before they go crazy etc. We all have to die at some point, why not in space while helping humanity get off the planet? I'm still trying to figure out how hairy hot dogs grow underwater on Mars...and if "Aman Tikla" means "Thank you!".... or "Friday has just discovered that THE MAN is everywhere in the universe!". Pat |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , says...
Doug... wrote: I And of course, Fox News can get some really good mileage out of claiming that the Martian War Machines that are abusing the poor slaves are really Saddam's Weapons of Mass Destruction! I smell a BIG contract, here! ![]() How about if we put those pain bracelets on all the guys rotting away down at Guantamano Bay? Then we put the bracelet activators and ray projectors in the bottoms of our stealth bombers, and we can replicate the scene! I like it! -- Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for | Doug Van Dorn thou art crunchy and taste good with ketchup | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Martian Game Reserves | Rand Simberg | Space Science Misc | 14 | August 22nd 03 12:50 AM |
Mars trajectory problems? | Bill Clark | Space Science Misc | 0 | July 13th 03 11:25 PM |