![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would think not They are very expensive,and only the Hubble
telescope could possibly get damaged. Light reflected off a mirror can't wear out the mirror. Why can't we have a TV channel showing what are telescopes around the world are looking at. The great feature would be getting kids interested in astronomy. Bert |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message...
... I would think not They are very expensive,and only the Hubble telescope could possibly get damaged. Light reflected off a mirror can't wear out the mirror. Why can't we have a TV channel showing what are telescopes around the world are looking at. The great feature would be getting kids interested in astronomy. Bert This is has been being done by NASA for quite some time now, Bert. On our cable network, NASA uses one or more of the "educational access" channels from time-to-time. And others are doing it on the web on a limited basis as well. Since scientists and students "timeshare" the big scopes, there will hopefully come a time when we shall be able to surf several channels on our TV, each showing a view from a large scope accompanied by a brief summary of what project is being worked on by the student or scientist. And right after that we may get an "Astronomy On Demand" channel with taped views of cool events seen by scopes. We'll be able to "pause," "play again," et cetera... I'm actually salivating! -- happy days and... starry starry nights! Paine Ellsworth |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message ... I would think not They are very expensive,and only the Hubble telescope could possibly get damaged. Light reflected off a mirror can't wear out the mirror. Why can't we have a TV channel showing what are telescopes around the world are looking at. The great feature would be getting kids interested in astronomy. Bert Generally, telescopic images are not captured in real time, such as you seem to describe here. Even very sensitive CCD cameras can take many minutes to capture an image, which is monochrome. Then other exposures are taken through various filters to gather the color information. The final image is only available after all frames have been captured, aligned and stacked, processed and enhanced. All of this is done "off-line". The only practical real time color imagery is from very bright objects such as planets (I do this all the time with a web cam through my scope) and a small number of the brighter nebulae and galaxies. Most objects require much more exposure time. Hap Griffin Astrophotos at www.machunter.org |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Hap Not to much in the universe happens in real time. The longer
the exposure(more photons) the better the image. I don't mind waiting in my darkroom to get a clear picture of light stopped in a trillionth of a second from its source. I even would rather watch NOVA that has Hubble pictures that I have seen three years ago than all the reruns of laugh shows,and movies (garbage) that is on TV every day. Seems children have to be taught to think. If Einstein and Feynman were watching today's TV as a child they would have taught us nothing. They were very lucky,and so were we Bert |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Intelligent Agents and robotic telescopes to help astronomers keepup with the universe (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | November 24th 03 07:44 PM |
A Galaxy Far, Far Away Eyed By Linked Hawaiian Telescopes | Ron Baalke | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 2nd 03 01:38 AM |
A Galaxy Far, Far Away Eyed By Linked Hawaiian Telescopes | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | October 2nd 03 01:38 AM |
Hollywood and telescopes | Matthew B. Ota | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | July 12th 03 03:00 PM |