![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://www.tmboptical.com/itemsGrid.asp?cat_id=31
This is a fine method for star testing. I just need all the conditions for seeing which is a lesson in waiting in itself. Cloud, crap and light rules the night! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"OncoBilly" wrote in message news:v%9Ac.49285$eA.20615@clgrps13...
http://www.tmboptical.com/itemsGrid.asp?cat_id=31 This is a fine method for star testing. I just need all the conditions for seeing which is a lesson in waiting in itself. Cloud, crap and light rules the night! Raise you right hand and say: "I do solemnly swear I have NEVER seen a perfect star test in ANY telescope, no matter what the mfg's may claim." But some have come very close. Tom Back's description of the test is one of the most lucid I've seen. The only things to ad would be: -Make sure YOU have no eye-based astigmatism prior to doing the test and make sure if you use a mirror diagonal that it's a top notch one, as some have poor mirrors and or non-right angle alignment of the mirror. Also, if you don't use a highly corrected across the field type eyepiece like a Nagler, be sure the star is dead centre as edge aberrations in orthos or Plossls can cause problems. -Rich |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"OncoBilly" wrote in message news:v%9Ac.49285$eA.20615@clgrps13...
http://www.tmboptical.com/itemsGrid.asp?cat_id=31 This is a fine method for star testing. I just need all the conditions for seeing which is a lesson in waiting in itself. Cloud, crap and light rules the night! Raise you right hand and say: "I do solemnly swear I have NEVER seen a perfect star test in ANY telescope, no matter what the mfg's may claim." But some have come very close. Tom Back's description of the test is one of the most lucid I've seen. The only things to ad would be: -Make sure YOU have no eye-based astigmatism prior to doing the test and make sure if you use a mirror diagonal that it's a top notch one, as some have poor mirrors and or non-right angle alignment of the mirror. Also, if you don't use a highly corrected across the field type eyepiece like a Nagler, be sure the star is dead centre as edge aberrations in orthos or Plossls can cause problems. -Rich |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Raise you right hand and say: "I do solemnly swear I have NEVER seen a perfect star test in ANY telescope, no matter what the mfg's may claim." But some have come very close. Tom Back's description of the test is one of the most lucid I've seen. The only things to ad would be: -Make sure YOU have no eye-based astigmatism prior to doing the test and make sure if you use a mirror diagonal that it's a top notch one, as some have poor mirrors and or non-right angle alignment of the mirror. Also, if you don't use a highly corrected across the field type eyepiece like a Nagler, be sure the star is dead centre as edge aberrations in orthos or Plossls can cause problems. My eyesight is about 90% or 95%. I see small light spikes when I look up at the stars without my eyeglasses. If I don't use eyeglasses when I look through an EP, am I seeing spikes too? TMB makes clear that barlows and diagonals should not be used BTW. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Raise you right hand and say: "I do solemnly swear I have NEVER seen a perfect star test in ANY telescope, no matter what the mfg's may claim." But some have come very close. Tom Back's description of the test is one of the most lucid I've seen. The only things to ad would be: -Make sure YOU have no eye-based astigmatism prior to doing the test and make sure if you use a mirror diagonal that it's a top notch one, as some have poor mirrors and or non-right angle alignment of the mirror. Also, if you don't use a highly corrected across the field type eyepiece like a Nagler, be sure the star is dead centre as edge aberrations in orthos or Plossls can cause problems. My eyesight is about 90% or 95%. I see small light spikes when I look up at the stars without my eyeglasses. If I don't use eyeglasses when I look through an EP, am I seeing spikes too? TMB makes clear that barlows and diagonals should not be used BTW. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My eyesight is about 90% or 95%. I see small light spikes when I look
up at the stars without my eyeglasses. If I don't use eyeglasses when I look through an EP, am I seeing spikes too? I can't say if you're seeing spikes. However, at high powers, the exit pupil is small, which means you use a smaller portion of your lens and cornea. This in turn decreases the effect of astigmatism. That's one reason it is recommended that you use high power when performing a star test. (Another, of course, is that it makes the pattern easier to see.) Unless your astimatism is particularly severe, just using high power (around 40x per inch of aperture, say) should suffice. TMB makes clear that barlows and diagonals should not be used BTW. I agree. Sometimes people get confused because of advice that they can be used during *collimation*, which is a separate activity that uses some of the same techniques. Brian Tung The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/ Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/ The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/ My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.txt |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My eyesight is about 90% or 95%. I see small light spikes when I look
up at the stars without my eyeglasses. If I don't use eyeglasses when I look through an EP, am I seeing spikes too? I can't say if you're seeing spikes. However, at high powers, the exit pupil is small, which means you use a smaller portion of your lens and cornea. This in turn decreases the effect of astigmatism. That's one reason it is recommended that you use high power when performing a star test. (Another, of course, is that it makes the pattern easier to see.) Unless your astimatism is particularly severe, just using high power (around 40x per inch of aperture, say) should suffice. TMB makes clear that barlows and diagonals should not be used BTW. I agree. Sometimes people get confused because of advice that they can be used during *collimation*, which is a separate activity that uses some of the same techniques. Brian Tung The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/ Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/ The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/ My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.txt |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"OncoBilly" wrote in message news:RpkAc.3$K53.1@edtnps89...
Raise you right hand and say: "I do solemnly swear I have NEVER seen a perfect star test in ANY telescope, no matter what the mfg's may claim." But some have come very close. Tom Back's description of the test is one of the most lucid I've seen. The only things to ad would be: -Make sure YOU have no eye-based astigmatism prior to doing the test and make sure if you use a mirror diagonal that it's a top notch one, as some have poor mirrors and or non-right angle alignment of the mirror. Also, if you don't use a highly corrected across the field type eyepiece like a Nagler, be sure the star is dead centre as edge aberrations in orthos or Plossls can cause problems. My eyesight is about 90% or 95%. I see small light spikes when I look up at the stars without my eyeglasses. If I don't use eyeglasses when I look through an EP, am I seeing spikes too? TMB makes clear that barlows and diagonals should not be used BTW. A good mirror diagonal (TeleVue, AP) shouldn't effect a star test, but a barlow might make the test less accurate by eye owing to it's pseudo-increasing of the focal ratio. Though I've never seen a barlow turn an f5 scope into an "f10" as far as performance, it can modify the image to a degree. -Rich |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"OncoBilly" wrote in message news:RpkAc.3$K53.1@edtnps89...
Raise you right hand and say: "I do solemnly swear I have NEVER seen a perfect star test in ANY telescope, no matter what the mfg's may claim." But some have come very close. Tom Back's description of the test is one of the most lucid I've seen. The only things to ad would be: -Make sure YOU have no eye-based astigmatism prior to doing the test and make sure if you use a mirror diagonal that it's a top notch one, as some have poor mirrors and or non-right angle alignment of the mirror. Also, if you don't use a highly corrected across the field type eyepiece like a Nagler, be sure the star is dead centre as edge aberrations in orthos or Plossls can cause problems. My eyesight is about 90% or 95%. I see small light spikes when I look up at the stars without my eyeglasses. If I don't use eyeglasses when I look through an EP, am I seeing spikes too? TMB makes clear that barlows and diagonals should not be used BTW. A good mirror diagonal (TeleVue, AP) shouldn't effect a star test, but a barlow might make the test less accurate by eye owing to it's pseudo-increasing of the focal ratio. Though I've never seen a barlow turn an f5 scope into an "f10" as far as performance, it can modify the image to a degree. -Rich |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Space Calendar - November 26, 2003 | Ron Baalke | History | 2 | November 28th 03 09:21 AM |
Space Calendar - November 26, 2003 | Ron Baalke | Astronomy Misc | 1 | November 28th 03 09:21 AM |
Space Calendar - October 24, 2003 | Ron Baalke | History | 0 | October 24th 03 04:38 PM |
Space Calendar - October 24, 2003 | Ron Baalke | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 24th 03 04:38 PM |
Space Calendar - September 28, 2003 | Ron Baalke | History | 0 | September 28th 03 08:00 AM |