A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Amateur Astronomy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

TMB star test



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 17th 04, 06:30 AM
OncoBilly
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default TMB star test

http://www.tmboptical.com/itemsGrid.asp?cat_id=31


This is a fine method for star testing. I just need all the conditions for
seeing which is a
lesson in waiting in itself. Cloud, crap and light rules the night!


  #2  
Old June 17th 04, 05:50 PM
Richard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default TMB star test

"OncoBilly" wrote in message news:v%9Ac.49285$eA.20615@clgrps13...
http://www.tmboptical.com/itemsGrid.asp?cat_id=31


This is a fine method for star testing. I just need all the conditions for
seeing which is a
lesson in waiting in itself. Cloud, crap and light rules the night!


Raise you right hand and say: "I do solemnly swear I have NEVER seen
a perfect star test in ANY telescope, no matter what the mfg's may claim."
But some have come very close.

Tom Back's description of the test is one of the most lucid I've seen.
The only things to ad would be:
-Make sure YOU have no eye-based astigmatism prior to doing the test and
make sure if you use a mirror diagonal that it's a top notch one, as some
have poor mirrors and or non-right angle alignment of the mirror.
Also, if you don't use a highly corrected across the field type eyepiece like
a Nagler, be sure the star is dead centre as edge aberrations in orthos
or Plossls can cause problems.
-Rich
  #3  
Old June 17th 04, 05:50 PM
Richard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default TMB star test

"OncoBilly" wrote in message news:v%9Ac.49285$eA.20615@clgrps13...
http://www.tmboptical.com/itemsGrid.asp?cat_id=31


This is a fine method for star testing. I just need all the conditions for
seeing which is a
lesson in waiting in itself. Cloud, crap and light rules the night!


Raise you right hand and say: "I do solemnly swear I have NEVER seen
a perfect star test in ANY telescope, no matter what the mfg's may claim."
But some have come very close.

Tom Back's description of the test is one of the most lucid I've seen.
The only things to ad would be:
-Make sure YOU have no eye-based astigmatism prior to doing the test and
make sure if you use a mirror diagonal that it's a top notch one, as some
have poor mirrors and or non-right angle alignment of the mirror.
Also, if you don't use a highly corrected across the field type eyepiece like
a Nagler, be sure the star is dead centre as edge aberrations in orthos
or Plossls can cause problems.
-Rich
  #4  
Old June 17th 04, 06:20 PM
OncoBilly
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default TMB star test


Raise you right hand and say: "I do solemnly swear I have NEVER seen
a perfect star test in ANY telescope, no matter what the mfg's may claim."
But some have come very close.

Tom Back's description of the test is one of the most lucid I've seen.
The only things to ad would be:
-Make sure YOU have no eye-based astigmatism prior to doing the test and
make sure if you use a mirror diagonal that it's a top notch one, as some
have poor mirrors and or non-right angle alignment of the mirror.
Also, if you don't use a highly corrected across the field type eyepiece

like
a Nagler, be sure the star is dead centre as edge aberrations in orthos
or Plossls can cause problems.


My eyesight is about 90% or 95%. I see small light spikes when I look up at
the stars without my
eyeglasses. If I don't use eyeglasses when I look through an EP, am I
seeing spikes too?

TMB makes clear that barlows and diagonals should not be used BTW.


  #5  
Old June 17th 04, 06:20 PM
OncoBilly
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default TMB star test


Raise you right hand and say: "I do solemnly swear I have NEVER seen
a perfect star test in ANY telescope, no matter what the mfg's may claim."
But some have come very close.

Tom Back's description of the test is one of the most lucid I've seen.
The only things to ad would be:
-Make sure YOU have no eye-based astigmatism prior to doing the test and
make sure if you use a mirror diagonal that it's a top notch one, as some
have poor mirrors and or non-right angle alignment of the mirror.
Also, if you don't use a highly corrected across the field type eyepiece

like
a Nagler, be sure the star is dead centre as edge aberrations in orthos
or Plossls can cause problems.


My eyesight is about 90% or 95%. I see small light spikes when I look up at
the stars without my
eyeglasses. If I don't use eyeglasses when I look through an EP, am I
seeing spikes too?

TMB makes clear that barlows and diagonals should not be used BTW.


  #6  
Old June 17th 04, 07:41 PM
Brian Tung
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default TMB star test

My eyesight is about 90% or 95%. I see small light spikes when I look
up at the stars without my eyeglasses. If I don't use eyeglasses when
I look through an EP, am I seeing spikes too?


I can't say if you're seeing spikes. However, at high powers, the exit
pupil is small, which means you use a smaller portion of your lens and
cornea. This in turn decreases the effect of astigmatism. That's one
reason it is recommended that you use high power when performing a star
test. (Another, of course, is that it makes the pattern easier to see.)
Unless your astimatism is particularly severe, just using high power
(around 40x per inch of aperture, say) should suffice.

TMB makes clear that barlows and diagonals should not be used BTW.


I agree. Sometimes people get confused because of advice that they can
be used during *collimation*, which is a separate activity that uses
some of the same techniques.

Brian Tung
The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/
Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/
The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/
My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.txt
  #7  
Old June 17th 04, 07:41 PM
Brian Tung
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default TMB star test

My eyesight is about 90% or 95%. I see small light spikes when I look
up at the stars without my eyeglasses. If I don't use eyeglasses when
I look through an EP, am I seeing spikes too?


I can't say if you're seeing spikes. However, at high powers, the exit
pupil is small, which means you use a smaller portion of your lens and
cornea. This in turn decreases the effect of astigmatism. That's one
reason it is recommended that you use high power when performing a star
test. (Another, of course, is that it makes the pattern easier to see.)
Unless your astimatism is particularly severe, just using high power
(around 40x per inch of aperture, say) should suffice.

TMB makes clear that barlows and diagonals should not be used BTW.


I agree. Sometimes people get confused because of advice that they can
be used during *collimation*, which is a separate activity that uses
some of the same techniques.

Brian Tung
The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/
Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/
The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/
My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.txt
  #8  
Old June 18th 04, 12:10 AM
Richard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default TMB star test

"OncoBilly" wrote in message news:RpkAc.3$K53.1@edtnps89...
Raise you right hand and say: "I do solemnly swear I have NEVER seen
a perfect star test in ANY telescope, no matter what the mfg's may claim."
But some have come very close.

Tom Back's description of the test is one of the most lucid I've seen.
The only things to ad would be:
-Make sure YOU have no eye-based astigmatism prior to doing the test and
make sure if you use a mirror diagonal that it's a top notch one, as some
have poor mirrors and or non-right angle alignment of the mirror.
Also, if you don't use a highly corrected across the field type eyepiece

like
a Nagler, be sure the star is dead centre as edge aberrations in orthos
or Plossls can cause problems.


My eyesight is about 90% or 95%. I see small light spikes when I look up at
the stars without my
eyeglasses. If I don't use eyeglasses when I look through an EP, am I
seeing spikes too?

TMB makes clear that barlows and diagonals should not be used BTW.


A good mirror diagonal (TeleVue, AP) shouldn't effect a star test,
but a barlow might make the test less accurate by eye owing to it's
pseudo-increasing of the focal ratio. Though I've never seen a barlow
turn an f5 scope into an "f10" as far as performance, it can modify
the image to a degree.
-Rich
  #9  
Old June 18th 04, 12:10 AM
Richard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default TMB star test

"OncoBilly" wrote in message news:RpkAc.3$K53.1@edtnps89...
Raise you right hand and say: "I do solemnly swear I have NEVER seen
a perfect star test in ANY telescope, no matter what the mfg's may claim."
But some have come very close.

Tom Back's description of the test is one of the most lucid I've seen.
The only things to ad would be:
-Make sure YOU have no eye-based astigmatism prior to doing the test and
make sure if you use a mirror diagonal that it's a top notch one, as some
have poor mirrors and or non-right angle alignment of the mirror.
Also, if you don't use a highly corrected across the field type eyepiece

like
a Nagler, be sure the star is dead centre as edge aberrations in orthos
or Plossls can cause problems.


My eyesight is about 90% or 95%. I see small light spikes when I look up at
the stars without my
eyeglasses. If I don't use eyeglasses when I look through an EP, am I
seeing spikes too?

TMB makes clear that barlows and diagonals should not be used BTW.


A good mirror diagonal (TeleVue, AP) shouldn't effect a star test,
but a barlow might make the test less accurate by eye owing to it's
pseudo-increasing of the focal ratio. Though I've never seen a barlow
turn an f5 scope into an "f10" as far as performance, it can modify
the image to a degree.
-Rich
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Space Calendar - November 26, 2003 Ron Baalke History 2 November 28th 03 09:21 AM
Space Calendar - November 26, 2003 Ron Baalke Astronomy Misc 1 November 28th 03 09:21 AM
Space Calendar - October 24, 2003 Ron Baalke History 0 October 24th 03 04:38 PM
Space Calendar - October 24, 2003 Ron Baalke Astronomy Misc 0 October 24th 03 04:38 PM
Space Calendar - September 28, 2003 Ron Baalke History 0 September 28th 03 08:00 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.