![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Anyone ever buy one? Was it any good or just "junk" (Orion's 30 day satisfaction warranty no doubt would be good news here) Thinking of getting one, selling the mini-EQ-1 tripod and red dot finder on Astromart as I only need the OTA. (with its non-standard screw in diagonal) Jerome Bigge Member, Muskegon Astronomical Society Author of the "Warlady" & "Wartime" series. Download at "http://members.tripod.com/~jbigge" |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jerome Bigge" wrote in message ... Anyone ever buy one? Was it any good or just "junk" (Orion's 30 day satisfaction warranty no doubt would be good news here) Thinking of getting one, selling the mini-EQ-1 tripod and red dot finder on Astromart as I only need the OTA. (with its non-standard screw in diagonal) I have one and keep it in my car. You're right about the mini-EQ-1 tripod -- get rid of it although I doubt if you'll get much for it. I already had a regular EQ-1 on a full sized tripod, and, with that, the Transporter works well for what it is -- a very short focal length 2.8" telescope. It's good for "star sweeping" and, with some help, it's OK for the moon. With such a short focal length, it's not good for planets. But, with dark enough skies, it'll give a killer view of M31. The red dot finder is all you need when using thistelescope; but getting rid of the finder won't hurt performance much because the field of view is so wide. It's also good on a photo tripod (which I also keep in my car) because the wide true FOV minimizes the amount of recentering that you will have to do. Just don't push the magnification -- 70mm won't hold up. My 14 mm Pentax XL eyepiece gives great views at 25X and my 9mm Nagler will give just under 40X. With the wide AFOV these give very nice views of star fields. (Both of these eyepieces cost nearly twice what the Transporter sells for, and, no, I didn't buy them for this little telescope; I already had them and just decided to see how they'd work with it.) Bottom line: it is what it is, a small aperture, short focal length achromat (meaning there is some false color visible). Understand its limitations and don't push it and it does its job. Jerome Bigge Member, Muskegon Astronomical Society Author of the "Warlady" & "Wartime" series. Download at "http://members.tripod.com/~jbigge" -- Tom Royer Lead Engineer The MITRE Corporation 202 Burlington Road Bedford, MA 01730 Voice: (781) 271-8399 Cell: (978) 290-2086 FAX: (781) 271-8500 "If you're not free to fail, you're not free." -- Gene Burns |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Congressional Resolutions on Hubble Space Telescope | EFLASPO | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | April 1st 04 03:26 PM |
Telescope for Child | Vedo | Amateur Astronomy | 11 | November 21st 03 03:38 PM |
World's Single Largest Telescope Mirror Moves To The LBT | Ron Baalke | Technology | 0 | November 11th 03 08:16 AM |
World's Single Largest Telescope Mirror Moves To The LBT | Ron Baalke | Astronomy Misc | 6 | November 5th 03 09:27 PM |