![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, the May issue just arrived in my mailbox and it shows the effect
of a number of important changes: It is wider. Good idea, it's easier to read and better for images. Sue French has taken over the Deep Sky Wonders column, formerly written by the near-legendary Walter Scott Houston. Very good idea. Sue is easily the best writer, and (very important) the most inspiring deep sky writer, (Houston too was an inspiring writer) and one of the most original, since Scotty. I am kind of amazed that the editors had sufficient insight to choose her. Charles Wood is given more space for his column on the moon. Very good idea. A neglected object because it is too easy) that deserves attention because of its beauty and the wealth of detail it offers. Sky & Tel doesn't say this but it is obvious: a much more probing, candid, equipment testing reviews. The review of the Hardin 10 inch Dob in the May issue by Gary Seronik is a model of what such reviews should be. You don't have to look between the lines in his review. (On the other hand, I found his "buyer's guide" to 10 inch Dobsonians to be so vague and general s to be a lot less helpful than the kinds of reviews found in Phil Harrington's StarWare.) The Hobby Q&A, by the Editors, seems a good idea also. Looks like Gary Seronik will be answering the ATM inquiries, which is a good idea. A better grouping of topics and columns, so it is easier to find all the columns on observing, for example. An observing column by Steve O'Meara. Hard to go wrong here. Steve is a superb observer who has a strong interest in objects other people can actually find and see, as opposed to abstruse IC objects and Abell clusters (which latter are also important, especially if you have an 18 inch scope and mag 6 or 7 skies). An observing column, by the redoubtable Tony Flanders, this month on his observing trip to Chile. What is good about Tony's column is that he is able to give you a sense of what it is like to observe from there (as opposed to the more usual, "NGC... is another great southern skies cluster, too bad you Northerners can't see it.") The emphasis on personal experience rather than catalog data, makes Tony a valuable columnist. And there are other changes. (The editors have for example, wisely reduced the size and prominence of the date (in this case, May) on the front cover, so the newsstand passers-by won't wrongly interpret an issue as out of date if it is an earlier month.) Perhaps you have a different perception of these changes? Ciao, Bill Meyers |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Bill Meyers wrote: SNIP_ Perhaps you have a different perception of these changes? Ciao, Bill Meyers Bill, I especially like the new paper, which has a finish that is a lot easier on these old eyes, and the unjustified (ragged) right margins. Also the wider width allows for a more versatile layout. I certainly agree about the writing style of Sue French. I didn't read her much in the beginning, as her articles seemed aimed at the novice, but each month she has covered subjects in greater detai. And even though her work is obviously heavily researched, it is very readable. Sue gets better and better each month. I especially like the fact that she is now including larger apertures in her deep-sky column. I also like her references to earlier articles, such as her inclusions of Leland Copeland's poetry in this issue. Sky & Tel is a classy rag, and it just keeps getting better. Starry Skies, Rich |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Three thumbs up from me! :-)
-- Greg Crinklaw Astronomical Software Developer Cloudcroft, New Mexico, USA (33N, 106W, 2700m) SkyTools Software for the Observer: http://www.skyhound.com/cs.html Skyhound Observing Pages: http://www.skyhound.com/sh/skyhound.html To reply remove spleen |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello, Rich,
It is a rare post where I agree strongly with everything in it, but this is one. I do like the new paper, the ragged right margins, and the greater width, for the reasons you give.. I agree too that Sue French'a columns get better and better. She includes lots of things I don't often see elsewhere. I was pleased too that she includes a 10 inch scope, since I use a 10 and an 11. Very important to me is that she is an inspiring writer. The ability to inspire people to observe also distinguished Walter Scott Houston. Lots of people, appropriately, try for it, but it's not so easy to do. Burnham's Celestial Handbook had this quality, and so does James Mullaney's Celestial Harvest, I feel. I have a theory about the ability to inspi it requires caring about the reader, as well as about the sky. It is heartening to see a makeover that actually improves the magazine substantially, especially since it was a very good magazine even before the makeover. Ciao, Bill Meyers Richard DeLuca wrote: In article , Bill Meyers wrote: SNIP_ Perhaps you have a different perception of these changes? Ciao, Bill Meyers Bill, I especially like the new paper, which has a finish that is a lot easier on these old eyes, and the unjustified (ragged) right margins. Also the wider width allows for a more versatile layout. I certainly agree about the writing style of Sue French. I didn't read her much in the beginning, as her articles seemed aimed at the novice, but each month she has covered subjects in greater detai. And even though her work is obviously heavily researched, it is very readable. Sue gets better and better each month. I especially like the fact that she is now including larger apertures in her deep-sky column. I also like her references to earlier articles, such as her inclusions of Leland Copeland's poetry in this issue. Sky & Tel is a classy rag, and it just keeps getting better. Starry Skies, Rich |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I LIKE the new look, and that's laying it on pretty thick, since I'm an
old fuddyduddy and I'm usually uncomfortable with change. Well done! That being said, I sure miss the way they used to put the name on the cover with the "Sky" in script, and the "Telescope" in print like on the original magazines. (Like I said...) Marty |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Greg, uhh, thats not your thumb.. *g*
I can understand and appreciate the excitement though ![]() Congrats to S&T and best wishes for ongoing success. Greg Crinklaw wrote in message ... Three thumbs up from me! :-) -- Greg Crinklaw Astronomical Software Developer Cloudcroft, New Mexico, USA (33N, 106W, 2700m) SkyTools Software for the Observer: http://www.skyhound.com/cs.html Skyhound Observing Pages: http://www.skyhound.com/sh/skyhound.html To reply remove spleen |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill Meyers wrote:
Well, the May issue just arrived in my mailbox and it shows the effect of a number of important changes: It is wider. Good idea, it's easier to read and better for images. Sue French has taken over the Deep Sky Wonders column, formerly written by the near-legendary Walter Scott Houston. Very good idea. Sue is easily the best writer, and (very important) the most inspiring deep sky writer, (Houston too was an inspiring writer) and one of the most original, since Scotty. I am kind of amazed that the editors had sufficient insight to choose her. Congratulations to Sue. I've been to star parties with Sue and Alan. Always had a great time. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Marty wrote in message:
I LIKE the new look, and that's laying it on pretty thick, since I'm an old fuddyduddy and I'm usually uncomfortable with change. Well done! That being said, I sure miss the way they used to put the name on the cover with the "Sky" in script, and the "Telescope" in print like on the original magazines. (Like I said...) Hi, Marty (and everyone) Kudos from me as well. The paper, margins, look, feel, content, staff, layout - all wonderful in my opinion - but not necessary in that order. Clear Skies, Dave Jessie |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No kudos from me...yet. Sky and Telescope persists in its dogged
refusal to send its magazine out to west coast subscribers earlier than it does its east coast subscribers, so that we all get it *at the same time*. I detect a subtle anti-west coast bias. (Of course, I'm very sensitive to that.) So, we wait and hope. Brian Tung The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/ Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/ The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/ My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.txt |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|