![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ian
I posted the following on another NG (uk.sci.astronomy) just before Christmas. I hope it helps. To answer your another of your questions - I suspect that the drive will be woefully inadequate for through the telescope photography except for the bright planets and the moon. It would probably be fine for piggy-back though. Drives suitable for long exposure through the telescope images tend to be quite expensive. Adam Quote I was out last night testing one for a nervous friend who has bought it for her husband for Xmas. To tell the truth, I was very pleasantly surprised with the optics. I was expecting much worse. Summary (Using my own high quality plossl EP's):- Star test shows obvious bad undercorrection (well it would with a 5" spherical mirror at f/6.9!) In-focus, stars were quite tight. Cassini Division on Saturn discernable at sides of the planet Bands in Jupiter easily visible (in poor seeing at low altitude) Castor very easily split Double-Double (just) clearly split Hole in Ring Nebula visible (in full moonlight) M13 showing signs of granulation (in full moonlight) Trapezium obvious and clear in M42 (well it should be, shouldn't it..) Moon - very nice for a "beginner scope" The supplied eyepieces are not as good as my own, but were not unreasonable. The Barlow was not tested. The supplied finderscope is execrable (or worse!), and I couldn't quite get it collimated with the main OTA. The telescope was badly mis-collimated as supplied, and the mirror is not centre-spotted. Collimation is easy however, and well explained. I tested the OTA on my own substantial GEM, so could not evaluate the supplied mount. HTH Adam -- "Ian Neill" wrote in message ... Hi, I am considering the above scope... Whats is it like? Are the optics good/bad? Is the mount sturdy? Is the scope reasonably portable? It has an RA motor, but is this good enough for astophotography? Is there significant periodic error? All opinions welcome, before I buy. Many thanks, Ian Neill |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NASA Selects Explorer Mission Proposals For Feasibility Studies | Ron Baalke | Astronomy Misc | 0 | November 4th 03 10:14 PM |
NASA Selects Explorer Mission Proposals For Feasibility Studies | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | November 4th 03 10:14 PM |
Expedition 7 Crew Talks With NASA Explorer Schools Educators | Ron Baalke | Space Station | 0 | July 17th 03 10:19 PM |