![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Since getting my new Pentax XWs I believe I've started to notice a pattern.
They need cool down time much like my telescope does. If the scope is cooled down enough, I can take my eyepieces warm out of the house outside and put my ortho's in without a problem. They just work. However, when I try this with my Pentax's I get that blurry feeling again, similar to mirror cool down issues. If I wait about 10 or 20 minutes (depending on how big the difference in temperature is) everything seems fine again. Have others seen this? It's not a big deal as I now just put my eyepieces out to cool with everything else. My scope seems to cool down in around a 1/2 hour and that seems more than enough for the eyepieces too. Just curious. Thanks, Mike. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() -- To reply, remove the "z" if one appears in my address "Mike Fitterman" wrote in message ... Since getting my new Pentax XWs I believe I've started to notice a pattern. They need cool down time much like my telescope does. If the scope is cooled down enough, I can take my eyepieces warm out of the house outside and put my ortho's in without a problem. They just work. However, when I try this with my Pentax's I get that blurry feeling again, similar to mirror cool down issues. If I wait about 10 or 20 minutes (depending on how big the difference in temperature is) everything seems fine again. Have others seen this? It's not a big deal as I now just put my eyepieces out to cool with everything else. My scope seems to cool down in around a 1/2 hour and that seems more than enough for the eyepieces too. Just curious. Thanks, Mike. Hi, Mike! This has been my experience with (some of) my larger eyepieces. I never really noticed it (because I always set everything outside at the same time, and it all sits out there waiting while the scope is coming to thermal equilibrium) until one evening when I was just testing a couple eyepieces, and left my big eyepiece case inside the house. During the test, I changed my original plan, and decided to try a few other eyepieces, and went inside and brought out another and then another, etc. And it took me a few minutes to figure out why the crappy performance of each one I brought out, compared to the original ones. It was the relatively large thermal mass of the eyepieces (Panoptics and Naglers), and the fairly large delta between the inside and outside temperatures. It didn't take them long to come to thermal equilibrium - quite a bit less than most scopes - but the effects, were easily seen. I'm not sure to what degree, or even if, this would be a problem with simpler, smaller eyepiece designs, but it was noticeable with several of my longer focal length Panoptics and Naglers... Because of the way I normally set up, I haven't tried this with any of my shorter focal length, smaller thermal mass eyepieces, so I can't say, based on experience, if the same would be the case with them... But now I do bear in mind these results, and make doubly sure my eyepieces go out at the same time as the scope... I'd be interested in the experiences of others, too... Jan |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() -- To reply, remove the "z" if one appears in my address "Mike Fitterman" wrote in message ... Since getting my new Pentax XWs I believe I've started to notice a pattern. They need cool down time much like my telescope does. If the scope is cooled down enough, I can take my eyepieces warm out of the house outside and put my ortho's in without a problem. They just work. However, when I try this with my Pentax's I get that blurry feeling again, similar to mirror cool down issues. If I wait about 10 or 20 minutes (depending on how big the difference in temperature is) everything seems fine again. Have others seen this? It's not a big deal as I now just put my eyepieces out to cool with everything else. My scope seems to cool down in around a 1/2 hour and that seems more than enough for the eyepieces too. Just curious. Thanks, Mike. Hi, Mike! This has been my experience with (some of) my larger eyepieces. I never really noticed it (because I always set everything outside at the same time, and it all sits out there waiting while the scope is coming to thermal equilibrium) until one evening when I was just testing a couple eyepieces, and left my big eyepiece case inside the house. During the test, I changed my original plan, and decided to try a few other eyepieces, and went inside and brought out another and then another, etc. And it took me a few minutes to figure out why the crappy performance of each one I brought out, compared to the original ones. It was the relatively large thermal mass of the eyepieces (Panoptics and Naglers), and the fairly large delta between the inside and outside temperatures. It didn't take them long to come to thermal equilibrium - quite a bit less than most scopes - but the effects, were easily seen. I'm not sure to what degree, or even if, this would be a problem with simpler, smaller eyepiece designs, but it was noticeable with several of my longer focal length Panoptics and Naglers... Because of the way I normally set up, I haven't tried this with any of my shorter focal length, smaller thermal mass eyepieces, so I can't say, based on experience, if the same would be the case with them... But now I do bear in mind these results, and make doubly sure my eyepieces go out at the same time as the scope... I'd be interested in the experiences of others, too... Jan |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mike Fitterman" wrote in message .. .
Since getting my new Pentax XWs I believe I've started to notice a pattern. They need cool down time much like my telescope does. If the scope is cooled down enough, I can take my eyepieces warm out of the house outside and put my ortho's in without a problem. They just work. However, when I try this with my Pentax's I get that blurry feeling again, similar to mirror cool down issues. If I wait about 10 or 20 minutes (depending on how big the difference in temperature is) everything seems fine again. Have others seen this? It's not a big deal as I now just put my eyepieces out to cool with everything else. My scope seems to cool down in around a 1/2 hour and that seems more than enough for the eyepieces too. Just curious. Thanks, Mike. I've seen people put a warm 2" diagonal on a cold scope and think the scope had yet to cool down. I guess any glass optic of sufficient mass needs some kind of noticeable cool-down time. -Rich |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mike Fitterman" wrote in message .. .
Since getting my new Pentax XWs I believe I've started to notice a pattern. They need cool down time much like my telescope does. If the scope is cooled down enough, I can take my eyepieces warm out of the house outside and put my ortho's in without a problem. They just work. However, when I try this with my Pentax's I get that blurry feeling again, similar to mirror cool down issues. If I wait about 10 or 20 minutes (depending on how big the difference in temperature is) everything seems fine again. Have others seen this? It's not a big deal as I now just put my eyepieces out to cool with everything else. My scope seems to cool down in around a 1/2 hour and that seems more than enough for the eyepieces too. Just curious. Thanks, Mike. I've seen people put a warm 2" diagonal on a cold scope and think the scope had yet to cool down. I guess any glass optic of sufficient mass needs some kind of noticeable cool-down time. -Rich |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Speers-Waler WA eyepieces : preliminary report | Lawrence Sayre | Amateur Astronomy | 4 | February 12th 04 06:02 AM |
Bands of Saturn. How many of them can be counted (really!) with 7" scope? | ValeryD | Amateur Astronomy | 294 | January 26th 04 08:18 PM |
UFO Activities from Biblical Times | Kazmer Ujvarosy | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 25th 03 05:21 AM |