![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have thought this out for less time than it will take me to compose the post. I
have not looked into why very long baseline telescopes work much less how to make them work. The current seti@home takes a little time and no cost other than electricity. But how cheap could a radio receiver be made and installed? And installed all over the world could they be tied together? Antenna location accuracy is GPS accuracy. Time accuracy under a second with time standard query. Probably not accurate enough to be useful. The cost would be a lower (seti) frequency than wireless networks so the electronics cost is only assembly not exotic hardware. Could a few hundred thousand people afford them? And if it does get expensive, would on at every university and interested company in the world help? But first, is there any value at all? -- When the media say Arab they mean Arab. When they said middle east looking men they mean Israelis. -- The Iron Webmaster, 2844 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cosmic Radio Signals can be polarized at 91 mhz, 160 mhz and UHF TV 78 | rev dan izzo | Astronomy Misc | 2 | September 26th 03 01:16 AM |
SETI radio 9-21, bye Galileo & Deep Sea Life talk | Jason H. | SETI | 4 | September 22nd 03 04:54 AM |
Whats the next goal? | Eric | SETI | 32 | September 19th 03 02:50 PM |
Nice SETI article in today's NY Times | Tony Sivori | SETI | 0 | July 8th 03 06:10 PM |
Einstein's Gravitational Waves May Set Speed Limit For Pulsar Spin | Ron Baalke | Astronomy Misc | 1 | July 3rd 03 08:49 AM |