![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
(Jason H.) wrote in message m...
....GIGANTO snip... They mentioned that they looked at a number of extra-solar planets (and other objects), so I plan to cross-ref the known extra-solar planet RA/DECS to the WU's I have to see which planets they are. I'll let you know what I find (if anything.) I've created the following table of Known Extra-Solar Planet RA/DEC's to help me to cross-compare their positions to the SETI@home Stellar Countdown WU RA/DEC's (very kindly sent to me.) http://www.geocities.com/exosearch/e...tablesepRA.htm (I've created a much bigger table of all known extra-solar planet RA/DEC's, but the link above only shows the 26 visible to SETI@home/Arecibo's limited window on space.) Thanks to the excellent work of real SETI@home WU crunchers (unlike myself), I've also been able to create a table (which is not ready to post here yet) of the Stellar Countdown WU's which has grown to approximately 35 pages of text with approx. 60 WU's on each, and the html version (also not yet ready to be posted) has grown to 6.2+ megs and I still have to add a few more (I'll probably have to break that down into several links/pages because I believe that my freebie FTP only accepts 5 megs at a time.) I'm able to sort the table using any of the following: start ra, end ra, start dec, end dec, angle range and sub band center frequency. The WU's are indeed grouping together on specific RA/DEC's of the same angle ranges and the same start and end RA/DEC's. I still have to tally up all the groupings, but it appears that there are considerably more WU RA/DECS than the publicized amount of re-visited candidates said to have been looked at by S@h on March 18th, 19th and 24th. I've created a column in the table called Notable Astronomical Features, and I'm still trying to decide what to put in it; there are lots of objects scanned by WU's, but there is a major issue here of accuracy of what I see and what is 'in' and 'out' of a WU. For example, the primary software that I'm using is Starry Night Pro, which is really great, with millions of objects accessible, but when I punch in the RA/DEC's for known extrasolar planet parent stars, there is a slight disparity when compared to the SIMBAD coordinates (so I still have to figure out who's using what coordinate standard when.) Hopefully the fine gentlemen at SETI@home will publish a more precise candidate RA/DEC list before my wife loses it, again! :^) Regards, Jason H. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AMBER ALPHA STAR CESAM stellar model | harlod caufield | Space Shuttle | 0 | December 27th 03 08:12 PM |
AMBER ALPHA STAR CESAM stellar model | harlod caufield | Policy | 0 | December 27th 03 08:10 PM |
Outer Space/NASA Pictures | . | Space Station | 0 | September 8th 03 04:03 PM |
Outer Space Pictures | . | Space Station | 0 | September 8th 03 03:51 PM |
Whats in the sky today | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | July 14th 03 04:24 AM |