![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thank you everybody for your continued help. I went up to Oceanside
Photo and Telescope (OPT) today and bought a telescope. If anybody is in the marked for a telescope, I highly recommend them. Very nice people who do not try to sell you something you don't need. Sorry Jon, but I ended up with the 9 1/4 SCT. I really liked the 10 inch Reflector but it simply wasn't going to fit into my car (well, at least not and let me drive). As for accessories, they talked me out of the dew heater system at first (I did get a nice Dew Shield), out of the focal length reducer, out of the GN16 (GPS attachment), and wouldn't let me buy any of the cases they had in house (but gave me instructions on how to make a better one myself for a fraction of the money). In all, they told me not to buy over $700 worth of things that I would have without their advice. Instead, he told me that what I really wanted was at least 1 good eyepiece. My plan was to use the "accessory kit" eyepieces to decide what I really needed but, after having them save me so much money, I let myself be talked into a Teleview 8mm Radian. This looks to be a very nice eyepiece with excellent eye relief. I came home and spent the evening putting the telescope together in the Garage. I considered taking it outside for a test but decided that I'd wait until tomorrow when I've had a chance to align the Finder Scope and the Telrad while it is still light out. Instead, I took out my trusty binoculars and did a little gazing that way. So, I have officially joined the telescope world and can now look forward to starting a brand new series of "How do I" posts. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thank you everybody for your continued help. I went up to Oceanside
Photo and Telescope (OPT) today and bought a telescope. If anybody is in the marked for a telescope, I highly recommend them. Very nice people who do not try to sell you something you don't need. Congratulations on your new scope. Of all the advice one can give to someone in San Diego, recommending OPT is the only one necessary... You do know that it has been scientifically established that buying a new scope results in cloudy nights in the region for approximately 3 weeks. You probably should have taken the chance last night to get some viewing in before the weather gods discovered your purchase. g The real lesson here though is that one must never believe because it is clear tonite, it will be clear tomorrow. If the skies are clear, get that scope out and do some looking... Sorry Jon, but I ended up with the 9 1/4 SCT. I really liked the 10 inch Reflector but it simply wasn't going to fit into my car (well, at least not and let me drive). Probably could be done, I could fit my 12.5 incher in my 1989 Nissan Sentra, but I wouldn't recommend it.... One needs room for passengers and sitting in the back seat behind the driver makes for awkward conversation and an oddly balanced car. The scope you choose should be a good one. As for accessories, they talked me out of the dew heater system at first (I did get a nice Dew Shield), out of the focal length reducer.... In San Diego, a dew shield will handle most situations, we don't have that dripping humidity that folks have in many other parts of the country... Regarding the focal reducer, I think that focal reducers are a good thing, I have one for my C-5 and that wider, flatter field of view is a good thing. The one that fits the C5 also fits the C-8 OTAs and probably the 9.25 incher as well. If you wanted to try it out sometime, you could. I don't use the C-5 much except for eclipes. Instead, he told me that what I really wanted was at least 1 good eyepiece. My plan was to use the "accessory kit" eyepieces to decide what I really needed but, after having them save me so much money, I let myself be talked into a Teleview 8mm Radian. Having a really good eyepiece is nice. But having a selection is nice as well. Did you still purchase the accessory kit, or did you pass on it? Best wishes, I am sure all will work out. Those guys at OPT will make sure that it does. And when it comes time to upgrade that SCT to a DOB, they'll be ready to help.... Big Grin jon |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thank you everybody for your continued help. I went up to Oceanside
Photo and Telescope (OPT) today and bought a telescope. If anybody is in the marked for a telescope, I highly recommend them. Very nice people who do not try to sell you something you don't need. Congratulations on your new scope. Of all the advice one can give to someone in San Diego, recommending OPT is the only one necessary... You do know that it has been scientifically established that buying a new scope results in cloudy nights in the region for approximately 3 weeks. You probably should have taken the chance last night to get some viewing in before the weather gods discovered your purchase. g The real lesson here though is that one must never believe because it is clear tonite, it will be clear tomorrow. If the skies are clear, get that scope out and do some looking... Sorry Jon, but I ended up with the 9 1/4 SCT. I really liked the 10 inch Reflector but it simply wasn't going to fit into my car (well, at least not and let me drive). Probably could be done, I could fit my 12.5 incher in my 1989 Nissan Sentra, but I wouldn't recommend it.... One needs room for passengers and sitting in the back seat behind the driver makes for awkward conversation and an oddly balanced car. The scope you choose should be a good one. As for accessories, they talked me out of the dew heater system at first (I did get a nice Dew Shield), out of the focal length reducer.... In San Diego, a dew shield will handle most situations, we don't have that dripping humidity that folks have in many other parts of the country... Regarding the focal reducer, I think that focal reducers are a good thing, I have one for my C-5 and that wider, flatter field of view is a good thing. The one that fits the C5 also fits the C-8 OTAs and probably the 9.25 incher as well. If you wanted to try it out sometime, you could. I don't use the C-5 much except for eclipes. Instead, he told me that what I really wanted was at least 1 good eyepiece. My plan was to use the "accessory kit" eyepieces to decide what I really needed but, after having them save me so much money, I let myself be talked into a Teleview 8mm Radian. Having a really good eyepiece is nice. But having a selection is nice as well. Did you still purchase the accessory kit, or did you pass on it? Best wishes, I am sure all will work out. Those guys at OPT will make sure that it does. And when it comes time to upgrade that SCT to a DOB, they'll be ready to help.... Big Grin jon |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 6 Feb 2004 0:21:12 -0600, Edward Smith wrote
(in message ): So, I have officially joined the telescope world and can now look forward to starting a brand new series of "How do I" posts. Congratulations, and hopefully the clouds will stay away. -- Harry F. Leopold aa #2076 AA/Vet #4 The Prints of Darkness The Internet is full, we can not accept any more posts until further notice. Thank you. - Kalinka Djnepropetrovska |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 6 Feb 2004 0:21:12 -0600, Edward Smith wrote
(in message ): So, I have officially joined the telescope world and can now look forward to starting a brand new series of "How do I" posts. Congratulations, and hopefully the clouds will stay away. -- Harry F. Leopold aa #2076 AA/Vet #4 The Prints of Darkness The Internet is full, we can not accept any more posts until further notice. Thank you. - Kalinka Djnepropetrovska |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Edward Smith" wrote in message
... 9 1/4 SCT. Teleview 8mm Radian I'm jealous g. 9.25's have a great reputation for good optics, and the 8mm Radian will make an awesome planet eyepiece at ~294x when the seeing supports it. Planet and moon viewing aren't affected by light pollution, and they are easy to find, so you have a great setup to start with for driveway astronomy. I would just caution you to take your time and become experienced. Those first several sessions sometimes leave you wondering if there is something wrong somewhere. My first several planet observations weren't so great (or deep sky for that matter), but now that I have observing skill, collimation skill and the ability to evaluate the atmospheric conditions based on a star test, I can't believe I ever thought the images were ever anything but great in those very same telescopes. One of the issues I have at home is that 200x+ is not always useful (nevermind 290x). You may find you need other eyepieces for those nights when 290x is too much magnification. But even if it's not a problem in your area on most nights, you will still want at least a 25mm Plossl for ~100x, a half degree true field of view and a 2.5mm exit pupil. When you aren't looking at the moon or planets, medium to low powers really come into their own. As for widest possible fields of view, the F6.3 R/C is one way to go, and a 2" diagonal with 2" eyepieces is another. Something like the 2" TV 50mm Plossl will get you all the way down to 47x and 1 degree of field without the R/C, but I'm not sure about vignetting. I "think" the 9.25 has a large enough primary baffle to allow the maximum field stop in a 2" eyepiece to be used, but someone might correct me. Anyway, great choice and best wishes, Stephen Paul |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Edward Smith" wrote in message
... 9 1/4 SCT. Teleview 8mm Radian I'm jealous g. 9.25's have a great reputation for good optics, and the 8mm Radian will make an awesome planet eyepiece at ~294x when the seeing supports it. Planet and moon viewing aren't affected by light pollution, and they are easy to find, so you have a great setup to start with for driveway astronomy. I would just caution you to take your time and become experienced. Those first several sessions sometimes leave you wondering if there is something wrong somewhere. My first several planet observations weren't so great (or deep sky for that matter), but now that I have observing skill, collimation skill and the ability to evaluate the atmospheric conditions based on a star test, I can't believe I ever thought the images were ever anything but great in those very same telescopes. One of the issues I have at home is that 200x+ is not always useful (nevermind 290x). You may find you need other eyepieces for those nights when 290x is too much magnification. But even if it's not a problem in your area on most nights, you will still want at least a 25mm Plossl for ~100x, a half degree true field of view and a 2.5mm exit pupil. When you aren't looking at the moon or planets, medium to low powers really come into their own. As for widest possible fields of view, the F6.3 R/C is one way to go, and a 2" diagonal with 2" eyepieces is another. Something like the 2" TV 50mm Plossl will get you all the way down to 47x and 1 degree of field without the R/C, but I'm not sure about vignetting. I "think" the 9.25 has a large enough primary baffle to allow the maximum field stop in a 2" eyepiece to be used, but someone might correct me. Anyway, great choice and best wishes, Stephen Paul |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You made a great choice. While I went with the C10 I've heard nothing but
praise for the 9.25. If I had a chance to make the choice over I would have gone with the 9.25 myself. Don't bother with the GPS attachment for the CG5 mount. The go to system only uses the latitude and longitude info, nothing else. About the only item you might want to look into is a Polar alignment finder for the mount, the one sold by Orion works better than Celestrons. Enjoy! the 9.25 is a great scope. Clay |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You made a great choice. While I went with the C10 I've heard nothing but
praise for the 9.25. If I had a chance to make the choice over I would have gone with the 9.25 myself. Don't bother with the GPS attachment for the CG5 mount. The go to system only uses the latitude and longitude info, nothing else. About the only item you might want to look into is a Polar alignment finder for the mount, the one sold by Orion works better than Celestrons. Enjoy! the 9.25 is a great scope. Clay |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Instead, he told me that what I really wanted was at least 1 good eyepiece. My plan was to use the "accessory kit" eyepieces to decide what I really needed but, after having them save me so much money, I let myself be talked into a Teleview 8mm Radian. Having a really good eyepiece is nice. But having a selection is nice as well. Did you still purchase the accessory kit, or did you pass on it? Oh, yes. I bought it. My initial thoughts were still valid. I wanted the "accessory kit" so I could learn what I needed and what I needed to upgrade. The 8mm Radian was a present to myself (and to OPT) for having the whole setup cost so much less than I had planned. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
8.4-meter Mirror Successfully Installed in Large Binocular Telescope | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 1 | April 9th 04 08:06 PM |
World's Single Largest Telescope Mirror Moves To The LBT | Ron Baalke | Technology | 0 | November 11th 03 08:16 AM |
World's Single Largest Telescope Mirror Moves To The LBT | Ron Baalke | Astronomy Misc | 6 | November 5th 03 09:27 PM |
Lowell Observatory and Discovery Communications Announce Partnership To Build Innovative Telescope Technology | Ron Baalke | Technology | 0 | October 16th 03 06:17 PM |
World's Largest Astronomical CCD Camera Installed On Palomar Observatory Telescope | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | July 29th 03 08:54 PM |