![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I decided to work on my XT10 a little more today. I pulled the end ring off
the secondary end, and made a cardboard disk to fit down inside the tube. I then measured and marked the center and cut out a circle the size of the retaining screw on the seconary holder. I then pressed the cardboard down into the tube flush wiith the seconday, and used the thumbscrews at the spider rod ends to center the secondary holder, positioning the retaining screw in the center of the cutout. This seemed to work great. A little more precision and better materials and it might be no sweat to make one that accounts for offset as well. Putting the end ring back on I then proceeded to use the Orion Collimation Tool to get the proper position and rotation under the focuser by adjusting the center retaining screw and the three secondary alignment screws. The Orion Collimation Tool is both a cross-hair site tube and cheshire eyepiece (that is if I have that right g). Maybe I should just say that it is a sight tube, has cross hairs, and one of those 45 degree angle light thingys to project a light donut down onto the primary (which is what I'm calling a cheshire, possibly in ignorance). g Anway, with the centered position and the correct rotation on the secondary, I then aligned everything to the center dot on the primary. To do this, I had to first adjust the secondary to center the primary center mark in the cross-hairs of the collimation tool. I then adjusted the primary to center the light donunt in the cross-hairs. When I did this, the donut, and the cross-hairs were not lined up with the center mark on the primary. So, I had to readjust the secondary to get the cross-hairs back over the primary center spot, and then adjust the primary again. It took just those two iterations. Once complete, this gave me nice concentric rings with both the primary center mark and the reflected light donut, centered in the shadow of the secondary, the shadow of the secondary was then centered in the reflection of the primary, and the reflection of the primary was centered in the focuser. I then checked everything with the laser, and the beam went right down the tube, hit the center mark on the primary, and reflected back in on itself. This is evidenced by the return "dot" not being visible anywhere on the surface of the laser faceplate when you look down into the scope at the reflection of the focuser as seen in the primary. Because my focuser is a little wobbly, I can rock it just enough to see this dot appear at the edge of the emitter hole on the laser faceplate. That lets me know that it is, in fact, exactly folded back on itself. An interesting thing about the laser, and I didn't believe this until this past weekend when I got into trouble and had a fit, is that the beam can fold back in on itself like this, and the collimation can be _way_ off. I still don't really understand exactly why that is, but I suspect it is the result of not having a properly centered secondary. Previously, my secondary was off-center, and when star collimated, the return beam of the laser was way off to one side of the faceplate. I've got the scope outside now and cooling off. Hopefully my star collimation is going to be much easier tonight, and that once complete the laser will agree with the alignment. Venus anyone? Stephen Paul Shirley, MA |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Stephen Paul" wrote in message ...
I've got the scope outside now and cooling off. Hopefully my star collimation is going to be much easier tonight, and that once complete the laser will agree with the alignment. Collimation was P-E-R-F-E-C-T. Didn't need to touch a thing when I got outside. The seeing was poor and Venus was low and in the soup, but Saturn looked really good considering the sky conditions. I was able to push 205x and not lose the Cassini. The Encke Minima was visible more often than not. Polar shading, the main equatorial belt and some shading in-between was obvious on the planet surface, as was the C ring. The Trap showed E easily, and F made appearances. A well collimated scope is a beautiful thing, especially when the seeing is poor. A night like last night with less than perfect collimation, would have been more dissapointing. -Stephen |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Stephen Paul" wrote in message ...
I've got the scope outside now and cooling off. Hopefully my star collimation is going to be much easier tonight, and that once complete the laser will agree with the alignment. Collimation was P-E-R-F-E-C-T. Didn't need to touch a thing when I got outside. The seeing was poor and Venus was low and in the soup, but Saturn looked really good considering the sky conditions. I was able to push 205x and not lose the Cassini. The Encke Minima was visible more often than not. Polar shading, the main equatorial belt and some shading in-between was obvious on the planet surface, as was the C ring. The Trap showed E easily, and F made appearances. A well collimated scope is a beautiful thing, especially when the seeing is poor. A night like last night with less than perfect collimation, would have been more dissapointing. -Stephen |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Stephen Paul" wrote in message ...
I've got the scope outside now and cooling off. Hopefully my star collimation is going to be much easier tonight, and that once complete the laser will agree with the alignment. Collimation was P-E-R-F-E-C-T. Didn't need to touch a thing when I got outside. The seeing was poor and Venus was low and in the soup, but Saturn looked really good considering the sky conditions. I was able to push 205x and not lose the Cassini. The Encke Minima was visible more often than not. Polar shading, the main equatorial belt and some shading in-between was obvious on the planet surface, as was the C ring. The Trap showed E easily, and F made appearances. A well collimated scope is a beautiful thing, especially when the seeing is poor. A night like last night with less than perfect collimation, would have been more dissapointing. -Stephen |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Last night was strange, it was windy and I expected poor seeing. However, I
watched a jet trail hold together pretty well for a few minutes and decided it was worth getting the scope out. Saturn was indeed better than expected, nothing like a couple of nights ago but better than average. It's like the upper atmosphere was reasonably steady despite a lot of wind on the ground. I found 200x about the limit in my 6" Mak, a couple of nights ago 300x was easy. "Stephen Paul" wrote in message om... "Stephen Paul" wrote in message ... I've got the scope outside now and cooling off. Hopefully my star collimation is going to be much easier tonight, and that once complete the laser will agree with the alignment. Collimation was P-E-R-F-E-C-T. Didn't need to touch a thing when I got outside. The seeing was poor and Venus was low and in the soup, but Saturn looked really good considering the sky conditions. I was able to push 205x and not lose the Cassini. The Encke Minima was visible more often than not. Polar shading, the main equatorial belt and some shading in-between was obvious on the planet surface, as was the C ring. The Trap showed E easily, and F made appearances. A well collimated scope is a beautiful thing, especially when the seeing is poor. A night like last night with less than perfect collimation, would have been more dissapointing. -Stephen |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Last night was strange, it was windy and I expected poor seeing. However, I
watched a jet trail hold together pretty well for a few minutes and decided it was worth getting the scope out. Saturn was indeed better than expected, nothing like a couple of nights ago but better than average. It's like the upper atmosphere was reasonably steady despite a lot of wind on the ground. I found 200x about the limit in my 6" Mak, a couple of nights ago 300x was easy. "Stephen Paul" wrote in message om... "Stephen Paul" wrote in message ... I've got the scope outside now and cooling off. Hopefully my star collimation is going to be much easier tonight, and that once complete the laser will agree with the alignment. Collimation was P-E-R-F-E-C-T. Didn't need to touch a thing when I got outside. The seeing was poor and Venus was low and in the soup, but Saturn looked really good considering the sky conditions. I was able to push 205x and not lose the Cassini. The Encke Minima was visible more often than not. Polar shading, the main equatorial belt and some shading in-between was obvious on the planet surface, as was the C ring. The Trap showed E easily, and F made appearances. A well collimated scope is a beautiful thing, especially when the seeing is poor. A night like last night with less than perfect collimation, would have been more dissapointing. -Stephen |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A question on Newtonian collimation | Stephen Paul | Amateur Astronomy | 119 | February 8th 04 03:56 AM |
Newtonian secondary collimation (question) | Stephen Paul | Amateur Astronomy | 8 | October 27th 03 03:47 AM |
12" Newtonian with 6% secondary | optidud | Amateur Astronomy | 57 | August 8th 03 07:48 AM |