![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Maybe this is old news to many of you, but for those of you who didn't
know, it's a change to set on your applicable astronomy software. It had been 84 degrees for some time. (Ref: John McAnally, ALPO) Brian Tung The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/ Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/ The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/ My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.txt |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Why is it the Great Red Spot is called System II? Why change a good name?
What is it a bunch of geeks got together at a glasses thickness convention and said you know the Great Red Spot is not geeky enough lets give it a new name so we can appear smarter then the rest. Lets see what name should we call it that will make us appear smarter and more superior then the masses? One geek pipes in I know what to call it. We should call it the mega Jupiter storm. Others said no that's to descriptive we won't appear smart if the name is descriptive. Another pipes in and suggest the big ass salmon colored oval. No damn it! That is still to descriptive. A third geek speaks up and this one has glasses that are 5 inches thick and says we will call it system II. The rest of the geeks were silent for a moment as they contemplated the name and then the whole convention erupted in cheers and they all agree to the name. It isn't very descriptive, you have to be in the hobby of amateur astronomy for at least 10 years before you know what it is and it gives the geeks the illusion of being smart. No thanks it is the Great Red Spot to me. I won't use the term System II. I want people to know what I am saying instead of thinking I am smart and above them by jabbering crap they can't understand. Plain talk Shawn |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Why is it the Great Red Spot is called System II? Why change a good name?
What is it a bunch of geeks got together at a glasses thickness convention and said you know the Great Red Spot is not geeky enough lets give it a new name so we can appear smarter then the rest. Lets see what name should we call it that will make us appear smarter and more superior then the masses? One geek pipes in I know what to call it. We should call it the mega Jupiter storm. Others said no that's to descriptive we won't appear smart if the name is descriptive. Another pipes in and suggest the big ass salmon colored oval. No damn it! That is still to descriptive. A third geek speaks up and this one has glasses that are 5 inches thick and says we will call it system II. The rest of the geeks were silent for a moment as they contemplated the name and then the whole convention erupted in cheers and they all agree to the name. It isn't very descriptive, you have to be in the hobby of amateur astronomy for at least 10 years before you know what it is and it gives the geeks the illusion of being smart. No thanks it is the Great Red Spot to me. I won't use the term System II. I want people to know what I am saying instead of thinking I am smart and above them by jabbering crap they can't understand. Plain talk Shawn |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Why is it the Great Red Spot is called System II? Why change a good name?
What is it a bunch of geeks got together at a glasses thickness convention and said you know the Great Red Spot is not geeky enough lets give it a new name so we can appear smarter then the rest. Lets see what name should we call it that will make us appear smarter and more superior then the masses? One geek pipes in I know what to call it. We should call it the mega Jupiter storm. Others said no that's to descriptive we won't appear smart if the name is descriptive. Another pipes in and suggest the big ass salmon colored oval. No damn it! That is still to descriptive. A third geek speaks up and this one has glasses that are 5 inches thick and says we will call it system II. The rest of the geeks were silent for a moment as they contemplated the name and then the whole convention erupted in cheers and they all agree to the name. It isn't very descriptive, you have to be in the hobby of amateur astronomy for at least 10 years before you know what it is and it gives the geeks the illusion of being smart. No thanks it is the Great Red Spot to me. I won't use the term System II. I want people to know what I am saying instead of thinking I am smart and above them by jabbering crap they can't understand. Plain talk Shawn |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Heh.
In the unlikely event anyone took Shawn's rant seriously, Jupiter's cloud systems are divided into zones based on the time it takes for them to rotate around the planet. Roughly speaking, the equatorial zone is called System I; the temperate zones are called System II; and the polar zones are called System III. The GRS just happens to be on the northern edge of System II in the southern hemisphere. Systems I and II (the ones interesting to amateurs) have periods that differ by 5 minutes. That may not seem like much, but it results in shear speeds at the boundary of hundreds of kilometers per second. Anyway, it means that you can't maintain a consistent system of longitude over the entirety of Jupiter--hence the Systems. Brian Tung The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/ Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/ The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/ My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.txt |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Heh.
In the unlikely event anyone took Shawn's rant seriously, Jupiter's cloud systems are divided into zones based on the time it takes for them to rotate around the planet. Roughly speaking, the equatorial zone is called System I; the temperate zones are called System II; and the polar zones are called System III. The GRS just happens to be on the northern edge of System II in the southern hemisphere. Systems I and II (the ones interesting to amateurs) have periods that differ by 5 minutes. That may not seem like much, but it results in shear speeds at the boundary of hundreds of kilometers per second. Anyway, it means that you can't maintain a consistent system of longitude over the entirety of Jupiter--hence the Systems. Brian Tung The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/ Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/ The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/ My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.txt |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Heh.
In the unlikely event anyone took Shawn's rant seriously, Jupiter's cloud systems are divided into zones based on the time it takes for them to rotate around the planet. Roughly speaking, the equatorial zone is called System I; the temperate zones are called System II; and the polar zones are called System III. The GRS just happens to be on the northern edge of System II in the southern hemisphere. Systems I and II (the ones interesting to amateurs) have periods that differ by 5 minutes. That may not seem like much, but it results in shear speeds at the boundary of hundreds of kilometers per second. Anyway, it means that you can't maintain a consistent system of longitude over the entirety of Jupiter--hence the Systems. Brian Tung The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/ Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/ The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/ My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.txt |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Shawn Grant" wrote in message ...
No thanks it is the Great Red Spot to me. I won't use the term System II. I want people to know what I am saying instead of thinking I am smart and above them by jabbering crap they can't understand. Plain talk Shawn Um, I wouldn't worry about people thinking you were smart if I were you. ;^) But I'm not you thank goodness. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Shawn Grant" wrote in message ...
No thanks it is the Great Red Spot to me. I won't use the term System II. I want people to know what I am saying instead of thinking I am smart and above them by jabbering crap they can't understand. Plain talk Shawn Um, I wouldn't worry about people thinking you were smart if I were you. ;^) But I'm not you thank goodness. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Shawn Grant" wrote in message ...
No thanks it is the Great Red Spot to me. I won't use the term System II. I want people to know what I am saying instead of thinking I am smart and above them by jabbering crap they can't understand. Plain talk Shawn Um, I wouldn't worry about people thinking you were smart if I were you. ;^) But I'm not you thank goodness. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
LSC Room 103, LCCV, UPRCV | Allen Thomson | Policy | 4 | February 5th 04 11:20 PM |
Astronomical Observations - Parts 1 & 2 | Fact Finder | Amateur Astronomy | 5 | August 25th 03 03:52 PM |
Incontrovertible Evidence | Cash | Astronomy Misc | 1 | August 24th 03 07:22 PM |
Incontrovertible Evidence | Cash | Amateur Astronomy | 6 | August 24th 03 07:22 PM |