Philae: Lost comet lander is found

http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-37276221

Too bad, this mission failed at the end!

On Mon, 5 Sep 2016 15:56:11 -0700 (PDT), StarDust
wrote:

http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-37276221

Too bad, this mission failed at the end!

Philae is considered a success, even if it did not meet all its
possible goals. Technically, all missions fail at the end.

On Monday, September 5, 2016 at 4:00:18 PM UTC-7, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Mon, 5 Sep 2016 15:56:11 -0700 (PDT), S
wrote:

http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-37276221

Too bad, this mission failed at the end!

Philae is considered a success, even if it did not meet all its
possible goals. Technically, all missions fail at the end.

Not mine!
I'll live for ever! (o:

On Mon, 5 Sep 2016 16:29:49 -0700 (PDT), StarDust
wrote:

On Monday, September 5, 2016 at 4:00:18 PM UTC-7, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Mon, 5 Sep 2016 15:56:11 -0700 (PDT), S
wrote:

http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-37276221

Too bad, this mission failed at the end!

Philae is considered a success, even if it did not meet all its
possible goals. Technically, all missions fail at the end.

Not mine!
I'll live for ever! (o:

Maybe. Time will tell.

On Monday, September 5, 2016 at 7:00:18 PM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Mon, 5 Sep 2016 15:56:11 -0700 (PDT), StarDust
wrote:

http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-37276221

Too bad, this mission failed at the end!

Philae is considered a success, even if it did not meet all its
possible goals. Technically, all missions fail at the end.

Titanic delivered thirty one passengers to their respective destinations.

Successful ship?

On Monday, September 5, 2016 at 4:49:25 PM UTC-7, wrote:
On Monday, September 5, 2016 at 7:00:18 PM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Mon, 5 Sep 2016 15:56:11 -0700 (PDT),

http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-37276221

Too bad, this mission failed at the end!

Philae is considered a success, even if it did not meet all its
possible goals. Technically, all missions fail at the end.

Titanic delivered thirty one passengers to their respective destinations.

Successful ship?

2%? )o:

On Monday, September 5, 2016 at 4:31:48 PM UTC-7, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Mon, 5 Sep 2016 16:29:49 -0700 (PDT),

On Monday, September 5, 2016 at 4:00:18 PM UTC-7, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Mon, 5 Sep 2016 15:56:11 -0700 (PDT), S
wrote:

http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-37276221

Too bad, this mission failed at the end!

Philae is considered a success, even if it did not meet all its
possible goals. Technically, all missions fail at the end.

Not mine!
I'll live for ever! (o:

Maybe. Time will tell.

my digital - Me! (o:

On Monday, September 5, 2016 at 8:21:49 PM UTC-4, StarDust wrote:
On Monday, September 5, 2016 at 4:49:25 PM UTC-7, wrote:
On Monday, September 5, 2016 at 7:00:18 PM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Mon, 5 Sep 2016 15:56:11 -0700 (PDT),

http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-37276221

Too bad, this mission failed at the end!

Philae is considered a success, even if it did not meet all its
possible goals. Technically, all missions fail at the end.

Titanic delivered thirty one passengers to their respective destinations.

Successful ship?

2%? )o:

It didn't meet all of its possible goals.

On Monday, September 5, 2016 at 6:14:08 PM UTC-7, wrote:
On Monday, September 5, 2016 at 8:21:49 PM UTC-4, StarDust wrote:
On Monday, September 5, 2016 at 4:49:25 PM UTC-7, wrote:
On Monday, September 5, 2016 at 7:00:18 PM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Mon, 5 Sep 2016 15:56:11 -0700 (PDT),

http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-37276221

Too bad, this mission failed at the end!

Philae is considered a success, even if it did not meet all its
possible goals. Technically, all missions fail at the end.

Titanic delivered thirty one passengers to their respective destinations.

Successful ship?

2%? )o:

It didn't meet all of its possible goals.

No! Kissed an iceberg!

On Tuesday, 6 September 2016 03:14:08 UTC+2, wrote:
On Monday, September 5, 2016 at 8:21:49 PM UTC-4, StarDust wrote:
On Monday, September 5, 2016 at 4:49:25 PM UTC-7, wrote:
On Monday, September 5, 2016 at 7:00:18 PM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Mon, 5 Sep 2016 15:56:11 -0700 (PDT),

http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-37276221

Too bad, this mission failed at the end!

Philae is considered a success, even if it did not meet all its
possible goals. Technically, all missions fail at the end.

Titanic delivered thirty one passengers to their respective destinations.

Successful ship?

2%? )o:

It didn't meet all of its possible goals.

Nah. It was sunk by inanely strict social hierarchy.
Or insanely strict if you want to floridize it.
No doubt lessons were eventually learned to the benefit of future shipping safety.
But only once the hierarchy had mulched it over as a possible threat to the bottom line.
Or badly leaking shipping line if you want to be pedantic.
Don't worry. You will. ;-)

BTW: I'm not really anti-anything on your personal shopping list.
I'm just an over-generous, constructive critic.
Holding up an undistorting mirror is a truer kindness than consistently voting for the barstewards due to your innate vacuity.