Darl Matter

Have any studies or has any research been done suggesting a
correlation between dark matter and the other dimensions posited in
Super String-Membrane (SS-M) theory? If those extra dimensions
actually exist, and if the idea that they are "rolled up to less than
a Planck length" is not an accurate assessment, maybe there is another
explanation for all this.
Start by imagining those other dimensions are actually a stack of
planes, each of which is less than a Planck length thick. Imagine a
deck of cards, each of which was less than a Planck length in
thickness. Even if this deck of cards was comprised of an infinite
number of cards the entire stack would not be discernable to us, from
our spatial dimensions frame.
Label our discernable spatial set as X, Y & Z. Then label another
spatial set as W, X & Y. This second spatial set would share the X & Y
dimensions with our spatial set but if the W dimension was comprised
of an infinite stack of X-Y planes, each of which was less than a
Planck length thick, we could not discern this other spatial set. Even
though it was right here in our spatial set.
Could this the explanation for dark matter?

Comments, please. Gordon

On Sunday, December 14, 2014 9:13:11 AM UTC-8, Gordon wrote:
Have any studies or has any research been done suggesting a
correlation between dark matter and the other dimensions posited in
Super String-Membrane (SS-M) theory? If those extra dimensions
actually exist, and if the idea that they are "rolled up to less than
a Planck length" is not an accurate assessment, maybe there is another
explanation for all this.
Start by imagining those other dimensions are actually a stack of
planes, each of which is less than a Planck length thick. Imagine a
deck of cards, each of which was less than a Planck length in
thickness. Even if this deck of cards was comprised of an infinite
number of cards the entire stack would not be discernable to us, from
our spatial dimensions frame.
Label our discernable spatial set as X, Y & Z. Then label another
spatial set as W, X & Y. This second spatial set would share the X & Y
dimensions with our spatial set but if the W dimension was comprised
of an infinite stack of X-Y planes, each of which was less than a
Planck length thick, we could not discern this other spatial set. Even
though it was right here in our spatial set.
Could this the explanation for dark matter?

Comments, please. Gordon

Universe is expanding with accelerating motion. THat could easily be used to answer for MISSING Gravity. Keep in mind an electron accelerated to 99.999999999 of c weighs in at 70,000 times its rest mass. Let the imperial thinkers kick that around. TreBert

On Sunday, December 14, 2014 9:13:11 AM UTC-8, Gordon wrote:
Have any studies or has any research been done suggesting a
correlation between dark matter and the other dimensions posited in
Super String-Membrane (SS-M) theory? If those extra dimensions
actually exist, and if the idea that they are "rolled up to less than
a Planck length" is not an accurate assessment, maybe there is another
explanation for all this.
Start by imagining those other dimensions are actually a stack of
planes, each of which is less than a Planck length thick. Imagine a
deck of cards, each of which was less than a Planck length in
thickness. Even if this deck of cards was comprised of an infinite
number of cards the entire stack would not be discernable to us, from
our spatial dimensions frame.
Label our discernable spatial set as X, Y & Z. Then label another
spatial set as W, X & Y. This second spatial set would share the X & Y
dimensions with our spatial set but if the W dimension was comprised
of an infinite stack of X-Y planes, each of which was less than a
Planck length thick, we could not discern this other spatial set. Even
though it was right here in our spatial set.
Could this the explanation for dark matter?

Comments, please. Gordon

Gravities compression for on particles is almost not measurable,but best to keep in mind the number of particles in the universe. Now add that in and nothing is missing. Get the picture. TreBert