![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[I'm approaching the Desktop Project endgame here; I'm almost out of
pictures to post. I've done this every day for weeks, and my computer desktop is almost clean! Of course, more stuff keeps coming in, so I could do this forever. But that would be cheating. Sweet, sweet cheating.] I’ve got something different for you today. Over the past few weeks I’ve posted an illustration, and a couple of dozen pictures, but no graphs! That’ll change now, and I think this particular set of plots is nifty. Whenever a big satellite is about to re-enter Earth’s atmosphere — like UARS, or ROSAT, or Phobos-Grunt — the media freak out. You start seeing numbers being thrown about of the odds of getting hit by a chunk of flaming debris, and I get lots of panicked email and tweets. Then I have to point out to people that the Earth has a lot of real estate for a satellite to come down on, and of that, 3/4 is water. And most of that is Pacific Ocean. So really, the most likely scenario is a re-entry into the Pacific, or some other ocean, and that’s that. But is that really true? After all, satellites can have different orbits, inclined with respect to the Earth’s equator. So the odds of getting dumped in the ocean might be different for a satellite that’s over the equator versus one in a polar orbit (that is, orbits almost completely in a north/south direction). Happily, orbital debris specialist Mark Matney did the math! In a paper published in the Orbital Debris Quarterly Newsletter (bet you didn’t know that existed!) he calculated those odds. He created two graphs for the paper, and both are really cool if you’re a graph nerd like I am. Here’s the first one: http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/ba...=Google+Reader |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 17:25:05 -0400, Metspitzer
wrote: [I'm approaching the Desktop Project endgame here; I'm almost out of pictures to post. I've done this every day for weeks, and my computer desktop is almost clean! Of course, more stuff keeps coming in, so I could do this forever. But that would be cheating. Sweet, sweet cheating.] I’ve got something different for you today. Over the past few weeks I’ve posted an illustration, and a couple of dozen pictures, but no graphs! That’ll change now, and I think this particular set of plots is nifty. Whenever a big satellite is about to re-enter Earth’s atmosphere — like UARS, or ROSAT, or Phobos-Grunt — the media freak out. You start seeing numbers being thrown about of the odds of getting hit by a chunk of flaming debris, and I get lots of panicked email and tweets. Then I have to point out to people that the Earth has a lot of real estate for a satellite to come down on, and of that, 3/4 is water. And most of that is Pacific Ocean. So really, the most likely scenario is a re-entry into the Pacific, or some other ocean, and that’s that. But is that really true? After all, satellites can have different orbits, inclined with respect to the Earth’s equator. So the odds of getting dumped in the ocean might be different for a satellite that’s over the equator versus one in a polar orbit (that is, orbits almost completely in a north/south direction). Happily, orbital debris specialist Mark Matney did the math! In a paper published in the Orbital Debris Quarterly Newsletter (bet you didn’t know that existed!) he calculated those odds. He created two graphs for the paper, and both are really cool if you’re a graph nerd like I am. Here’s the first one: http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/ba...=Google+Reader As good as this all is, it won't stop some people from doing their Chicken Little routine everytime there's a sat dunk. All they have to do is move a decimal point here or screw up a metric conversion there. and all you hear is... THE S K Y IS F A L L I N G - THE S K Y IS F A L L I N G Maybe somebody should write a nursery story about that? You'd think there'd be something in human lore about this by now... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicken_Little Happy days *and*... Starry starry nights ! -- Indelibly yours, Paine @ http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/ Only you can make the most of yourself. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
On orbit satellite collision: What are the odds? | andrew.higgins@mcgill.ca | Policy | 2 | February 13th 09 03:48 PM |
odds of passing arrangement | Neal.Macchio@organisation.fm.us | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | August 19th 07 01:01 AM |
WATER WATER WATER FOR AUSTRALIA... HOPELESSLY PRAYING MR HOWARD | sir.jpturcaud@neuf.fr | Astronomy Misc | 3 | February 11th 07 10:57 AM |
Playing the odds. | Bob Haller | Space Shuttle | 24 | July 3rd 06 11:56 PM |
What are the Odds of Orbiting ??? | G=EMC^2 Glazier | Misc | 8 | December 27th 03 05:49 PM |