![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Okay, so I made this modification some time back and decided that it wasn't
worth the effort considering that my Dob was stored outside in a shed for most of its life. However, having recently moved into a new home (with no shed available), and since the observatory isn't even close to being started, the scopes are now stored in the garage. The temperature differential is hence greater than it used to be (garage is attached/insulated), and the results are now more obvious. The fan modification is definitely worth the effort for scopes that have to transition even a mere 5 degrees F. Previously, I also had thought that fan vibration was a problem, but I no longer believe that to be the case. What might be the problem is the velocity at which the air flow is sweeping the mirror as I am still running at the full fan speed at 12VDC. Velocity of air flow is quantifiably visible in the out of focus image during star test collimation. I think I was interpreting that as vibration in earlier tests (and may even have stated this theory at that time). (I really need to get speed control. Can someone remind me how to do this with a 12VDC fan? (And don't say 9VDC battery)). I think the main difference with the fan is the controlled "sweeping" of air across the mirror, in lieu of the turbulence of natural convection. The sweeping of air is of even greater benefit than simply cooling the glass, as it gives an immediate result. I was very nicely surprised at last night's results. Adler rocks! -- -Stephen Paul |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "Stephen Paul"
wrote: Previously, I also had thought that fan vibration was a problem, but I no longer believe that to be the case. I never had vibration problems either. The key would seem to be having a sanwhich approach. I used a layer of GE silicone glue to attach window insulation foam to the fan base. Then I used another thick bead of the silicone to attach the foam to the mirror box of my scope. My first iteration used urethane adhesive for the fan-foam connection, it seemed equally effective. Could run both of the 3-1/2 fans full out with no detectable vibration. -- Jeff Morgan email: eliminate the number and substitute mindspring for nospam |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Stephen Paul" wrote in message ... Okay, so I made this modification some time back and decided that it wasn't worth the effort considering that my Dob was stored outside in a shed for most of its life. However, having recently moved into a new home (with no shed available), and since the observatory isn't even close to being started, the scopes are now stored in the garage. The temperature differential is hence greater than it used to be (garage is attached/insulated), and the results are now more obvious. The fan modification is definitely worth the effort for scopes that have to transition even a mere 5 degrees F. Previously, I also had thought that fan vibration was a problem, but I no longer believe that to be the case. What might be the problem is the velocity at which the air flow is sweeping the mirror as I am still running at the full fan speed at 12VDC. Velocity of air flow is quantifiably visible in the out of focus image during star test collimation. I think I was interpreting that as vibration in earlier tests (and may even have stated this theory at that time). (I really need to get speed control. Can someone remind me how to do this with a 12VDC fan? (And don't say 9VDC battery)). I think the main difference with the fan is the controlled "sweeping" of air across the mirror, in lieu of the turbulence of natural convection. The sweeping of air is of even greater benefit than simply cooling the glass, as it gives an immediate result. I was very nicely surprised at last night's results. Adler rocks! -- -Stephen Paul A 250 ohm pot in series will get you good speed control. For another fan install that works well, this might be worth a read: http://tinyurl.com/qhte Active cooling works. Clear skies, Tom |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Tom Hole earthlink.net" tomhole@NOSPAM wrote in message
... A 250 ohm pot in series will get you good speed control. Thanks Tom. Know where I can get one with a mini foot print that can handle the current (and how much current that is)? -Stephen |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
(I really need to get speed control. Can someone remind me how to do this
with a 12VDC fan? (And don't say 9VDC battery)). A simple variable resistor placed in the circuit should do it. Try your local Radio Shack. Ritesh |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Stephen Paul" wrote in message ... "Tom Hole earthlink.net" tomhole@NOSPAM wrote in message ... A 250 ohm pot in series will get you good speed control. Thanks Tom. Know where I can get one with a mini foot print that can handle the current (and how much current that is)? -Stephen Stephen, Radio Shack has one. One fan should draw from 90-140 milliamps depending on your fan. Every pot Rat Shack sells should handle that. I got one with an on off switch built in to keep from having to unhook the battery. Clear skies, Tom |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
% About Alan Erskine | Anonymous Sender | Space Shuttle | 0 | August 15th 03 09:21 PM |
Psycho Coward Alan Erskine in Space | [email protected] | History | 4 | August 3rd 03 01:53 PM |
Alan the Coward - Where's you address Alan ? | starwars | Space Shuttle | 0 | July 31st 03 05:49 AM |
Alan the Coward - Where's you address Alan ? | starwars | Space Station | 0 | July 31st 03 05:49 AM |
Alan the Coward - Where's you address Alan ? | starwars | Policy | 0 | July 31st 03 05:49 AM |