![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is there enough information to state the acceleration is directly towards the sun ?
What if there is an acceleration towards the earth ? Isn't this worth investigating. Spud |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andr? Michaud wrote:
(Spud) wrote in message ... Is there enough information to state the acceleration is directly towards the sun ? Yes. What if there is an acceleration towards the earth ? Isn't this worth investigating. There is no need. Both crafts are on escape trajectories from the Solar system in opposite directions, the Sun being the central body of the system. The attraction of the Earth is totally negligible at the distances involved. And yet it was the target of the probes' transmissions, and to aim their antennae, they aimed their whole bodies at it. Since the anomalous acceleration was so small, and the angle between Earth and the sun as seen from the probes was also small in most of the years when the acceleration was being measured, it may well be that there is no way to tell whether they were anomalously accelerating towards the Sun due to some Solar-mass-dependent effect, or towards the Earth because of a force aligned with one of their axes. If you knew, and could show, that for sure no such force could have been acting, then of course no investigation would be worthwhile. Maybe it still isn't, but the case for not looking is not made by assuming nothing can be there. --- Graham Cowan http://www.eagle.ca/~gcowan/Paper_for_11th_CHC.doc -- How individual mobility gains nuclear cachet. Link if you want it to happen |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andr? Michaud wrote:
(Spud) wrote in message ... Is there enough information to state the acceleration is directly towards the sun ? Yes. What if there is an acceleration towards the earth ? Isn't this worth investigating. There is no need. Both crafts are on escape trajectories from the Solar system in opposite directions, the Sun being the central body of the system. The attraction of the Earth is totally negligible at the distances involved. And yet it was the target of the probes' transmissions, and to aim their antennae, they aimed their whole bodies at it. Since the anomalous acceleration was so small, and the angle between Earth and the sun as seen from the probes was also small in most of the years when the acceleration was being measured, it may well be that there is no way to tell whether they were anomalously accelerating towards the Sun due to some Solar-mass-dependent effect, or towards the Earth because of a force aligned with one of their axes. If you knew, and could show, that for sure no such force could have been acting, then of course no investigation would be worthwhile. Maybe it still isn't, but the case for not looking is not made by assuming nothing can be there. --- Graham Cowan http://www.eagle.ca/~gcowan/Paper_for_11th_CHC.doc -- How individual mobility gains nuclear cachet. Link if you want it to happen |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"G. R. L. Cowan" wrote in message ...
Andr? Michaud wrote: (Spud) wrote in message ... Is there enough information to state the acceleration is directly towards the sun ? Yes. What if there is an acceleration towards the earth ? Isn't this worth investigating. There is no need. Both crafts are on escape trajectories from the Solar system in opposite directions, the Sun being the central body of the system. The attraction of the Earth is totally negligible at the distances involved. And yet it was the target of the probes' transmissions, and to aim their antennae, they aimed their whole bodies at it. Since the anomalous acceleration was so small, and the angle between Earth and the sun as seen from the probes was also small in most of the years when the acceleration was being measured, it may well be that there is no way to tell whether they were anomalously accelerating towards the Sun due to some Solar-mass-dependent effect, or towards the Earth because of a force aligned with one of their axes. If you knew, and could show, that for sure no such force could have been acting, then of course no investigation would be worthwhile. Maybe it still isn't, but the case for not looking is not made by assuming nothing can be there. I see what you mean, and I agree in principle. We cannot assume stuff without analysis. I don't think that anyone can "prove" that no force could have been acting between the Earth and the probes. I just understand that the only known long range force (and only possible candidate force, from all we know) that could have been acting between the Earth and the probes, and which is gravitation, is negligible at such distances compared to that acting from the Sun. As for the Doppler analysis, it seems impossible to me that compensation for the cyclic orbital motion of the Earth would not have been the very first correction to have been applied to the data. From all the papers published, it seems to me that just about all possible avenues not jeopardyzing GR and SR have by now been explored and rejected as unsatisfactory or shelved as non conclusive or impossible to verify. André Michaud |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
pioneer 10 acceleration | alistair | Astronomy Misc | 38 | July 5th 04 09:49 AM |
P10 Anomalous Acceleration 7.8(10^-3)cm/sec^2? | Ralph Sansbury | Astronomy Misc | 20 | July 2nd 04 03:07 PM |
Pioneer 10 Update - December 3, 2003 | Ron Baalke | History | 0 | December 3rd 03 04:49 PM |
"Pioneer anomalous acceleration" and Cassini | Jonathan Silverlight | Astronomy Misc | 49 | November 18th 03 07:37 PM |