![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Imperial thinkers for years told us light hitting glass or water has part going through but slowed down (refraction),and part bouncing back for(reflection) They are idiots. Photons never slow down,nor do they bounce. I have posted my thoughts on this many times over the last 19 years TreBert
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
STILL DEAD WRONG, BEERTbrainMORONIDIOT!
Saul Levy On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 07:17:56 -0700 (PDT), "G=EMC^2" wrote: Imperial thinkers for years told us light hitting glass or water has part going through but slowed down (refraction),and part bouncing back for(reflection) They are idiots. Photons never slow down,nor do they bounce. I have posted my thoughts on this many times over the last 19 years TreBert |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... STILL DEAD WRONG, BEERTbrainMORONIDIOT! Saul Levy On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 07:17:56 -0700 (PDT), "G=EMC^2" wrote: Imperial thinkers for years told us light hitting glass or water has part going through but slowed down (refraction),and part bouncing back for(reflection) They are idiots. Photons never slow down,nor do they bounce. I have posted my thoughts on this many times over the last 19 years TreBert very simply put light is absorbed and re-emitted it does not bounce! very simply put this absorption and re-emission is also slowed when the material is transmitted through the material! so again your premise is faulty because you do not understand, well anything as for posting your thoughts over the last 19 years...thanks I've gotten a lot of laughs.. now take another hit off that bong and chill! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 19, 7:17*am, "G=EMC^2" wrote:
Imperial thinkers for years told us light hitting glass or water has part going through but slowed down (refraction),and part bouncing back for(reflection) They are idiots. Photons never slow down,nor do they bounce. I have posted my thoughts on this many times over the last 19 years * TreBert Except quantum tunneling of photons is FTL, as independently proven multiple times by independent research using different methods, and black holes seem to create maximum redshift that's certainly capable of internally exceeding FTL. Even though actual photons haven't been objectively proven to move along in any given trajectory, they do manage to get sort of FIFO transponder like relayed along at various speeds depending on the medium. Going through diamond slows their FIFO propagation way the hell down. http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 19, 9:26*am, "David Staup" wrote:
wrote in message ... STILL DEAD WRONG, BEERTbrainMORONIDIOT! Saul Levy On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 07:17:56 -0700 (PDT), "G=EMC^2" wrote: Imperial thinkers for years told us light hitting glass or water has part going through but slowed down (refraction),and part bouncing back for(reflection) They are idiots. Photons never slow down,nor do they bounce. I have posted my thoughts on this many times over the last 19 years * TreBert very simply put light is absorbed and re-emitted it does not bounce! very simply put this absorption and re-emission is also slowed when the material is transmitted through the material! so again your premise is faulty because you do not understand, well anything as for posting your thoughts over the last 19 years...thanks I've gotten a lot of laughs.. now take another hit off that bong and chill! Since you're replying to rabbi Saul Levy as being the resident moron idiot and FUD-master of mainstream suckology, you've hit the Semite nail. Good for you. http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Brad Guth" wrote in message ... On Sep 19, 9:26 am, "David Staup" wrote: wrote in message ... STILL DEAD WRONG, BEERTbrainMORONIDIOT! Saul Levy On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 07:17:56 -0700 (PDT), "G=EMC^2" wrote: Imperial thinkers for years told us light hitting glass or water has part going through but slowed down (refraction),and part bouncing back for(reflection) They are idiots. Photons never slow down,nor do they bounce. I have posted my thoughts on this many times over the last 19 years TreBert very simply put light is absorbed and re-emitted it does not bounce! very simply put this absorption and re-emission is also slowed when the material is transmitted through the material! so again your premise is faulty because you do not understand, well anything as for posting your thoughts over the last 19 years...thanks I've gotten a lot of laughs.. now take another hit off that bong and chill! Since you're replying to rabbi Saul Levy as being the resident moron idiot and FUD-master of mainstream suckology, you've hit the Semite nail. Good for you. http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” dreaming again guthball? your responce shows me that your reading comprehension is non existant |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
GET ONE THING STRAIGHT, GOOF, YOU ARE THE RESIDENT MORON HERE, NOT ME!
**** OFF, YOU INSANE ****ING IDIOT! Saul Levy On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 09:47:30 -0700 (PDT), Brad Guth wrote: On Sep 19, 9:26*am, "David Staup" wrote: wrote in message ... STILL DEAD WRONG, BEERTbrainMORONIDIOT! Saul Levy On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 07:17:56 -0700 (PDT), "G=EMC^2" wrote: Imperial thinkers for years told us light hitting glass or water has part going through but slowed down (refraction),and part bouncing back for(reflection) They are idiots. Photons never slow down,nor do they bounce. I have posted my thoughts on this many times over the last 19 years * TreBert very simply put light is absorbed and re-emitted it does not bounce! very simply put this absorption and re-emission is also slowed when the material is transmitted through the material! so again your premise is faulty because you do not understand, well anything as for posting your thoughts over the last 19 years...thanks I've gotten a lot of laughs.. now take another hit off that bong and chill! Since you're replying to rabbi Saul Levy as being the resident moron idiot and FUD-master of mainstream suckology, you've hit the Semite nail. Good for you. Brad Guth, YES I AM THE VILLAGE IDIOT! |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 07:17:56 -0700 (PDT), "G=EMC^2"
wrote: Imperial thinkers for years told us light hitting glass or water has part going through but slowed down (refraction),and part bouncing back for(reflection) They are idiots. Photons never slow down,nor do they bounce. I have posted my thoughts on this many times over the last 19 years TreBert Didn't you say also several times that you had slowed photons to almost a walk? or did you say you had stopped one? -- Indelibly yours, Paine http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/ |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 19, 10:01*am, "David Staup" wrote:
"Brad Guth" wrote in message ... On Sep 19, 9:26 am, "David Staup" wrote: wrote in message .. . STILL DEAD WRONG, BEERTbrainMORONIDIOT! Saul Levy On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 07:17:56 -0700 (PDT), "G=EMC^2" wrote: Imperial thinkers for years told us light hitting glass or water has part going through but slowed down (refraction),and part bouncing back for(reflection) They are idiots. Photons never slow down,nor do they bounce. I have posted my thoughts on this many times over the last 19 years TreBert very simply put light is absorbed and re-emitted it does not bounce! very simply put this absorption and re-emission is also slowed when the material is transmitted through the material! so again your premise is faulty because you do not understand, well anything as for posting your thoughts over the last 19 years...thanks I've gotten a lot of laughs.. now take another hit off that bong and chill! Since you're replying to rabbi Saul Levy as being the resident moron idiot and FUD-master of mainstream suckology, you've hit the Semite nail. *Good for you. *http://translate.google.com/# *Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / Guth Usenet dreaming again guthball? your responce shows me that your reading comprehension is non existant I wasn't the dysfunctional Usenet contributor, because that was clearly you. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/19/2011 1:39 PM, Painius wrote:
On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 07:17:56 -0700 (PDT), "G=EMC^2" wrote: Imperial thinkers for years told us light hitting glass or water has part going through but slowed down (refraction),and part bouncing back for(reflection) They are idiots. Photons never slow down,nor do they bounce. I have posted my thoughts on this many times over the last 19 years TreBert Didn't you say also several times that you had slowed photons to almost a walk? or did you say you had stopped one? You don't really believe that Bert remembers...Do you? -- "OK you ****s, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Thinking about Chinese strategic thinking about milspace | Allen Thomson | Policy | 33 | October 3rd 07 03:12 PM |
Hmmm, just thinking about the dark matter problem... | jtaylor@NOSPAM.hfx.andara.com | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | February 27th 07 09:41 AM |
Meade Instruments Granted Patents on Reflection, Refraction | Joe Bergeron | Amateur Astronomy | 5 | April 2nd 06 01:45 AM |
horizion refraction question | Jim Z | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | April 14th 05 06:21 PM |