|
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
July 16th 11, 04:24 PM
posted to alt.astronomy
|
|||
|
|||
Convex Curve of Space = Its End
My Convex and Concave space theory gives the two possible ways for
universe to end. Einstein's concave for gravity will not be the universe's final end(not enough force) Glazier's convex creates universe expansion,and that has more than enough force for continual expansion. I rather think of this ending as dark,cold,and the universe thinning out to pure aether Aether with what is refered to as virtual energy,or phantum energy. I can see the universe as a "white hole" at this spacetime TreBert 
|
|
#2
July 19th 11, 05:23 PM
posted to alt.astronomy
|
|||
|
|||
|
Convex Curve of Space = Its End
WE DON'T LIKE IT, BEERTbrainMORONIDIOT!
THOSE OTHERS DON'T KNOW YOU'RE A SENILE OLD GOAT! Saul Levy On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 04:32:53 -0700 (PDT), "G=EMC^2" wrote: Concave & Convex theory gives reason for creation of universes, and how they end. It is one of my three best theories,and my email tells me its well received. I know Double A likes it. I know people at U of Mass like it. TreBert
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Anti-Universes and Convex Space Curve | herbert glazier | Misc | 5 | May 12th 11 09:30 PM |
| Space doesn't curve. But Spacetime Does. | Koobee Wublee | Astronomy Misc | 5 | March 11th 11 02:45 AM |
| Gravity ,Motion ,Curve Space ,Particle Attraction Push of spaceenergy | [email protected] | Misc | 2 | February 10th 08 06:15 AM |
| Spin =Inertia Curve space=Gravity | G=EMC^2 Glazier | Misc | 4 | January 7th 07 03:32 AM |
| Does My Convex Space Theory Give Space Expansion the 5th Dimension? | G=EMC^2 Glazier | Misc | 2 | September 2nd 06 12:41 AM |
Linear Mode
