Giant mammal’s red blood cell remains found in meteorite

Giant mammal’s red blood cell remains found in meteorite NWA 5480

The following micrograph shows mammalian red blood cell remains twice
the size of human red blood cells. They are found in meteorite NWA
5480, which is believed by some geologists to have come from asteroid
Vesta. Fig. 1: http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...782681885&p=10

Source and credit for the above image:
http://www.meteorite.com/meteorite-g...lpha_frame.htm
(sourcing path: Select “NWA 5480 article” from above URL, then scroll
down the right part to the middle, and you will find this photo with
file name of NWA-5480-0.40-mm-3.)

On 7月17日, 下�1時16分, Wretch Fossil wrote:
Giant mammal’s red blood cell remains found in meteorite NWA 5480

The following micrograph shows mammalian red blood cell remains twice
the size of human red blood cells. They are found in meteorite NWA
5480, which is believed by some geologists to have come from asteroid
Vesta. Fig. 1:http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...782681885&p=10

Source and credit for the above image:http://www.meteorite.com/meteorite-g...lpha_frame.htm
(sourcing path: Select “NWA 5480 article� from above URL, then scroll
down the right part to the middle, and you will find this photo with
file name of NWA-5480-0.40-mm-3.)

Added on July 17, 2011:
Human RBC’s at 1660X for comparison

The following figure shows human red blood cells at 1660X:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...782693762&p=11
Source of above figu http://www.visualsunlimited.com/image/I0000TtQPgXVbIOk

Compare those human red blood cells with these gigantic red blood
cells of ET mammals (also at 1,660X):
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...81885.jpg&p=10

All my articles are at http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0

On 7月17日, 下�6時02分, Wretch Fossil wrote:
On 7月17日, 下�1時16分, Wretch Fossil wrote:

Giant mammal’s red blood cell remains found in meteorite NWA 5480

The following micrograph shows mammalian red blood cell remains twice
the size of human red blood cells. They are found in meteorite NWA
5480, which is believed by some geologists to have come from asteroid
Vesta. Fig. 1:http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...782681885&p=10

Source and credit for the above image:http://www.meteorite.com/meteorite-g...lpha_frame.htm
(sourcing path: Select “NWA 5480 article� from above URL, then scroll
down the right part to the middle, and you will find this photo with
file name of NWA-5480-0.40-mm-3.)

Added on July 17, 2011:
Human RBC’s at 1660X for comparison

The following figure shows human red blood cells at 1660X:http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...782693762&p=11
Source of above figuhttp://www.visualsunlimited.com/image/I0000TtQPgXVbIOk

Compare those human red blood cells with these gigantic red blood
cells of ET mammals (also at 1,660X):http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...o1782681885.jp...

All my articles are athttp://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0

Added on July 17, 2011:
Only dinosaurs had such RBC’s

Fig.1 and Fig.2 below contain mammalian red blood cell remains that
are about 16 microns in diameter. On Earth, only dinosaurs had
mammalian red blood cells over 13 microns in diameter (table 1, Fig.
3, Fig. 4).

Fig. 1:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...1782619688&p=5
Fig. 2:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...782681885&p=10
Table 1:
Mammalian RBC sizes
http://www.genomesize.com/cellsize/mammals.htm
Fig. 3:
Dinosaur RBC’s imaged by Dr. Mary H. Schweitzer:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...881284001&p=20
Fig. 4:
Dinosaur RBC size
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...881258081&p=28

On 7月17日, 下�10時03分, Wretch Fossil wrote:
On 7月17日, 下�6時02分, Wretch Fossil wrote:









On 7月17日, 下�1時16分, Wretch Fossil wrote:

Giant mammal’s red blood cell remains found in meteorite NWA 5480

The following micrograph shows mammalian red blood cell remains twice
the size of human red blood cells. They are found in meteorite NWA
5480, which is believed by some geologists to have come from asteroid
Vesta. Fig. 1:http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...782681885&p=10

Source and credit for the above image:http://www.meteorite.com/meteorite-g...lpha_frame.htm
(sourcing path: Select “NWA 5480 article� from above URL, then scroll
down the right part to the middle, and you will find this photo with
file name of NWA-5480-0.40-mm-3.)

Added on July 17, 2011:
Human RBC’s at 1660X for comparison

The following figure shows human red blood cells at 1660X:http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...782693762&p=11
Source of above figuhttp://www.visualsunlimited.com/image/I0000TtQPgXVbIOk

Compare those human red blood cells with these gigantic red blood
cells of ET mammals (also at 1,660X):http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...o1782681885.jp...

All my articles are athttp://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0

Added on July 17, 2011:
Only dinosaurs had such RBC’s

Fig.1 and Fig.2 below contain mammalian red blood cell remains that
are about 16 microns in diameter. On Earth, only dinosaurs had
mammalian red blood cells over 13 microns in diameter (table 1, Fig.
3, Fig. 4).

Fig. 1:http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...1782619688&p=5
Fig. 2:http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...782681885&p=10
Table 1:
Mammalian RBC sizeshttp://www.genomesize.com/cellsize/mammals.htm
Fig. 3:
Dinosaur RBC’s imaged by Dr. Mary H. Schweitzer:http://www.wretch..cc/album/show.php...881284001&p=20
Fig. 4:
Dinosaur RBC sizehttp://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=12&f=1881258081&p=28

Added on July 18, 2011:
Can they be things other than RBC’s?

I have considered the following possibilities. You can check them out
against this micrograph:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...782703639&p=15

1. They are chondrules within meteorites: chondrules are not concave.
2. They are air bubbles resulting from thin section preparation: No
thin section shows so many minute air bubbles in such small areas. Air
bubbles do not deform into so many shapes as RBC’s do.
3. They are geological vesicles: Geological vesicles do not show the
rims of donuts. Red blood cells do.
4. They are lipid droplets (fat globules) or fat cells: Lipid droplets
and fat cells are not concave.
5. They are cross sections of blood vessels: If so, they must be
vertical blood vessels that were cut horizontally for their cross
sections. All vertical blood vessels and no horizontal blood vessels?
Impossible.
6. Why no white blood cells? Human blood cells consist of 99% red
blood cells and 1% white blood cells. So, white blood cells are rare.
Another reason is that I am no expert in white blood cells. However, I
just found something that “might� be a white blood cell with a
devilish face he
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...782703641&p=16

That’s all for now.

On 7月18日, 下�7時05分, Wretch Fossil wrote:
On 7月17日, 下�10時03分, Wretch Fossil wrote:









On 7月17日, 下�6時02分, Wretch Fossil wrote:

On 7月17日, 下�1時16分, Wretch Fossil wrote:

Giant mammal’s red blood cell remains found in meteorite NWA 5480

The following micrograph shows mammalian red blood cell remains twice
the size of human red blood cells. They are found in meteorite NWA
5480, which is believed by some geologists to have come from asteroid
Vesta. Fig. 1:http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...782681885&p=10

Source and credit for the above image:http://www.meteorite.com/meteorite-g...lpha_frame.htm
(sourcing path: Select “NWA 5480 article� from above URL, then scroll
down the right part to the middle, and you will find this photo with
file name of NWA-5480-0.40-mm-3.)

Added on July 17, 2011:
Human RBC’s at 1660X for comparison

The following figure shows human red blood cells at 1660X:http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...782693762&p=11
Source of above figuhttp://www.visualsunlimited.com/image/I0000TtQPgXVbIOk

Compare those human red blood cells with these gigantic red blood
cells of ET mammals (also at 1,660X):http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...o1782681885.jp...

All my articles are athttp://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0

Added on July 17, 2011:
Only dinosaurs had such RBC’s

Fig.1 and Fig.2 below contain mammalian red blood cell remains that
are about 16 microns in diameter. On Earth, only dinosaurs had
mammalian red blood cells over 13 microns in diameter (table 1, Fig.
3, Fig. 4).

Fig. 1:http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...1782619688&p=5
Fig. 2:http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...782681885&p=10
Table 1:
Mammalian RBC sizeshttp://www.genomesize.com/cellsize/mammals.htm
Fig. 3:
Dinosaur RBC’s imaged by Dr. Mary H. Schweitzer:http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...881284001&p=20
Fig. 4:
Dinosaur RBC sizehttp://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=12&f=1881258081&p=28

Added on July 18, 2011:
Can they be things other than RBC’s?

I have considered the following possibilities. You can check them out
against this micrograph:http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...782703639&p=15

1. Â* Â* Â*They are chondrules within meteorites: chondrules are not concave.
2. Â* Â* Â*They are air bubbles resulting from thin section preparation: No
thin section shows so many minute air bubbles in such small areas. Air
bubbles do not deform into so many shapes as RBC’s do.
3. Â* Â* Â*They are geological vesicles: Geological vesicles do not show the
rims of donuts. Red blood cells do.
4. Â* Â* Â*They are lipid droplets (fat globules) or fat cells: Lipid droplets
and fat cells are not concave.
5. Â* Â* Â*They are cross sections of blood vessels: If so, they must be
vertical blood vessels that were cut horizontally for their cross
sections. All vertical blood vessels and no horizontal blood vessels?
Impossible.
6. Â* Â* Â*Why no white blood cells? Human blood cells consist of 99% red
blood cells and 1% white blood cells. So, white blood cells are rare.
Another reason is that I am no expert in white blood cells. However, I
just found something that “might� be a white blood cell with a
devilish face hehttp://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...782703641&p=16

That’s all for now.

Edited on July 19, 2011: Can they be other things?

I have considered the following possibilities. You can check them
using this micrograph:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...782703639&p=15

1. They are chondrules within meteorites: Chondrules are not concave.

2. They are air bubbles resulting from thin section preparation: No
thin section shows so many air bubbles so small in such small areas.
Air bubbles do not deform into so many shapes as Red blood cells do.

3. They are geological vesicles: Geological vesicles do not show the
rims of donuts. Red blood cells do.

4. They are lipid droplets (fat globules) or fat cells: Lipid droplets
and fat cells are not concave.

5. They are cross sections of blood vessels: The micrographs show no
tissues around all these “blood vessel remains�.

6. Why do the red blood cell remains show different sizes? Blood from
different kinds of animals could have been mixed together by water.

7. Why no white blood cells? White blood cells are rare. There is one
that could be a white blood cell (monocyte)
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...782713096&p=17

On 7月19日, 下�4時25分, Wretch Fossil wrote:
On 7月18日, 下�7時05分, Wretch Fossil wrote:









On 7月17日, 下�10時03分, Wretch Fossil wrote:

On 7月17日, 下�6時02分, Wretch Fossil wrote:

On 7月17日, 下�1時16分, Wretch Fossil wrote:

Giant mammal’s red blood cell remains found in meteorite NWA 5480

The following micrograph shows mammalian red blood cell remains twice
the size of human red blood cells. They are found in meteorite NWA
5480, which is believed by some geologists to have come from asteroid
Vesta. Fig. 1:http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...782681885&p=10

Source and credit for the above image:http://www.meteorite.com/meteorite-g...lpha_frame.htm
(sourcing path: Select “NWA 5480 article� from above URL, then scroll
down the right part to the middle, and you will find this photo with
file name of NWA-5480-0.40-mm-3.)

Added on July 17, 2011:
Human RBC’s at 1660X for comparison

The following figure shows human red blood cells at 1660X:http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...782693762&p=11
Source of above figuhttp://www.visualsunlimited.com/image/I0000TtQPgXVbIOk

Compare those human red blood cells with these gigantic red blood
cells of ET mammals (also at 1,660X):http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...o1782681885.jp...

All my articles are athttp://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0

Added on July 17, 2011:
Only dinosaurs had such RBC’s

Fig.1 and Fig.2 below contain mammalian red blood cell remains that
are about 16 microns in diameter. On Earth, only dinosaurs had
mammalian red blood cells over 13 microns in diameter (table 1, Fig.
3, Fig. 4).

Fig. 1:http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...1782619688&p=5
Fig. 2:http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...782681885&p=10
Table 1:
Mammalian RBC sizeshttp://www.genomesize.com/cellsize/mammals.htm
Fig. 3:
Dinosaur RBC’s imaged by Dr. Mary H. Schweitzer:http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...881284001&p=20
Fig. 4:
Dinosaur RBC sizehttp://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=12&f=1881258081&p=28

Added on July 18, 2011:
Can they be things other than RBC’s?

I have considered the following possibilities. You can check them out
against this micrograph:http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...782703639&p=15

1. Â* Â* Â*They are chondrules within meteorites: chondrules are not concave.
2. Â* Â* Â*They are air bubbles resulting from thin section preparation: No
thin section shows so many minute air bubbles in such small areas. Air
bubbles do not deform into so many shapes as RBC’s do.
3. Â* Â* Â*They are geological vesicles: Geological vesicles do not show the
rims of donuts. Red blood cells do.
4. Â* Â* Â*They are lipid droplets (fat globules) or fat cells: Lipid droplets
and fat cells are not concave.
5. Â* Â* Â*They are cross sections of blood vessels: If so, they must be
vertical blood vessels that were cut horizontally for their cross
sections. All vertical blood vessels and no horizontal blood vessels?
Impossible.
6. Â* Â* Â*Why no white blood cells? Human blood cells consist of 99% red
blood cells and 1% white blood cells. So, white blood cells are rare.
Another reason is that I am no expert in white blood cells. However, I
just found something that “might� be a white blood cell with a
devilish face hehttp://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...782703641&p=16

That’s all for now.

Edited on July 19, 2011: Can they be other things?

I have considered the following possibilities. You can check them
using this micrograph:http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...782703639&p=15

1. They are chondrules within meteorites: Chondrules are not concave.

2. They are air bubbles resulting from thin section preparation: No
thin section shows so many air bubbles so small in such small areas.
Air bubbles do not deform into so many shapes as Red blood cells do.

3. They are geological vesicles: Geological vesicles do not show the
rims of donuts. Red blood cells do.

4. They are lipid droplets (fat globules) or fat cells: Lipid droplets
and fat cells are not concave.

5. They are cross sections of blood vessels: The micrographs show no
tissues around all these “blood vessel remains�.

6. Why do the red blood cell remains show different sizes? Blood from
different kinds of animals could have been mixed together by water.

7. Why no white blood cells? White blood cells are rare. There is one
that could be a white blood cell (monocyte)http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...782713096&p=17

0. They can be minerals, microbes, fungi, or plant cells: All
these
cannot be concave in thin sections.

On 7月19日, 下�5時35分, Wretch Fossil wrote:
On 7月19日, 下�4時25分, Wretch Fossil wrote:









On 7月18日, 下�7時05分, Wretch Fossil wrote:

On 7月17日, 下�10時03分, Wretch Fossil wrote:

On 7月17日, 下�6時02分, Wretch Fossil wrote:

On 7月17日, 下�1時16分, Wretch Fossil wrote:

Giant mammal’s red blood cell remains found in meteorite NWA 5480

The following micrograph shows mammalian red blood cell remains twice
the size of human red blood cells. They are found in meteorite NWA
5480, which is believed by some geologists to have come from asteroid
Vesta. Fig. 1:http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...782681885&p=10

Source and credit for the above image:http://www.meteorite.com/meteorite-g...lpha_frame.htm
(sourcing path: Select “NWA 5480 article� from above URL, then scroll
down the right part to the middle, and you will find this photo with
file name of NWA-5480-0.40-mm-3.)

Added on July 17, 2011:
Human RBC’s at 1660X for comparison

The following figure shows human red blood cells at 1660X:http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...782693762&p=11
Source of above figuhttp://www.visualsunlimited.com/image/I0000TtQPgXVbIOk

Compare those human red blood cells with these gigantic red blood
cells of ET mammals (also at 1,660X):http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...o1782681885.jp...

All my articles are athttp://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0

Added on July 17, 2011:
Only dinosaurs had such RBC’s

Fig.1 and Fig.2 below contain mammalian red blood cell remains that
are about 16 microns in diameter. On Earth, only dinosaurs had
mammalian red blood cells over 13 microns in diameter (table 1, Fig..
3, Fig. 4).

Fig. 1:http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...1782619688&p=5
Fig. 2:http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...782681885&p=10
Table 1:
Mammalian RBC sizeshttp://www.genomesize.com/cellsize/mammals.htm
Fig. 3:
Dinosaur RBC’s imaged by Dr. Mary H. Schweitzer:http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...881284001&p=20
Fig. 4:
Dinosaur RBC sizehttp://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=12&f=1881258081&p=28

Added on July 18, 2011:
Can they be things other than RBC’s?

I have considered the following possibilities. You can check them out
against this micrograph:http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...782703639&p=15

1. Â* Â* Â*They are chondrules within meteorites: chondrules are not concave.
2. Â* Â* Â*They are air bubbles resulting from thin section preparation: No
thin section shows so many minute air bubbles in such small areas. Air
bubbles do not deform into so many shapes as RBC’s do.
3. Â* Â* Â*They are geological vesicles: Geological vesicles do not show the
rims of donuts. Red blood cells do.
4. Â* Â* Â*They are lipid droplets (fat globules) or fat cells: Lipid droplets
and fat cells are not concave.
5. Â* Â* Â*They are cross sections of blood vessels: If so, they must be
vertical blood vessels that were cut horizontally for their cross
sections. All vertical blood vessels and no horizontal blood vessels?
Impossible.
6. Â* Â* Â*Why no white blood cells? Human blood cells consist of 99% red
blood cells and 1% white blood cells. So, white blood cells are rare.
Another reason is that I am no expert in white blood cells. However, I
just found something that “might� be a white blood cell with a
devilish face hehttp://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...782703641&p=16

That’s all for now.

Edited on July 19, 2011: Can they be other things?

I have considered the following possibilities. You can check them
using this micrograph:http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...782703639&p=15

1. They are chondrules within meteorites: Chondrules are not concave.

2. They are air bubbles resulting from thin section preparation: No
thin section shows so many air bubbles so small in such small areas.
Air bubbles do not deform into so many shapes as Red blood cells do.

3. They are geological vesicles: Geological vesicles do not show the
rims of donuts. Red blood cells do.

4. They are lipid droplets (fat globules) or fat cells: Lipid droplets
and fat cells are not concave.

5. They are cross sections of blood vessels: The micrographs show no
tissues around all these “blood vessel remains�.

6. Why do the red blood cell remains show different sizes? Blood from
different kinds of animals could have been mixed together by water.

7. Why no white blood cells? White blood cells are rare. There is one
that could be a white blood cell (monocyte)http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...782713096&p=17

0. They can be minerals, microbes, fungi, or plant cells: All
these
Â* Â* Â*cannot be concave in thin sections.

Added on July 20, 2011:
Why they are not air bubbles.

A geologist kept on saying that the red blood cell remains are just
air bubbles (geological vesicles). The following three micrographs
show why they are not air bubbles.
Fig. 1: shows hundreds of minute circles in a minute area.
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...782713099&p=20

Fig. 2: shows a standing disc-shaped red blood cell.
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...782713097&p=18

Fig. 3: shows red blood cell remains that are not round at all.
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...782713098&p=19