![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
While it is not economically feasible to store hydrogen as an
automobile fuel *now* I wouldn't rule it out even in the short-term. Solid metallic hydrogen is close to being achieved: Hydrogen metal on the horizon. 10 April 2002 "Scientists have long expected solid hydrogen to become a metal when it is compressed, but so far electrical conductivity has only been detected in liquid hydrogen. Now an experimental study of solid hydrogen at pressures up to 320 GPa predicts that it will become metallic at a pressure of 450 GPa - over four million times atmospheric pressure. Ren LeToullec and co-workers at the CEA in France also found that solid hydrogen becomes opaque - or 'black' - under compression (P Loubeyre et al 2002 Nature 416 613)." http://physicsweb.org/article/news/6/4/6 For this to be useful as a storage means, the hydrogen has to be stable at "reasonable" temperatures. A recent study shows solid nitrogen can be stable up to 100K: Novel nitrogen is a semiconductor. 9 May 2001 "A new form of nitrogen that behaves as a semiconductor could be a future source of energy, according to Russell Hemley and colleagues of the Carnegie Institution of Washington in the US. The group compressed nitrogen gas to create the 'non-molecular' nitrogen - an opaque solid that releases a flood of energy when it reverts to its well-known diatomic form (M Eremets et al 2001 Nature 411 170). "The team then reduced the pressure on different samples at a variety of temperatures. Remarkably, they found that the semiconducting state persisted at normal atmospheric pressure at temperatures below 100 K. A pronounced hysteresis effect arises because the change in phase lags behind the change in pressure." http://physicsweb.org/article/news/05/5/5 There are conflicting theoretical studies about whether metallic hydrogen would retain its solid form and electronic properties when the pressure was released. This study on nitrogen suggests that it could. Bob Clark Uncle Al wrote in message ... Sam Wormley wrote: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE The American Institute of Physics Bulletin of Physics News Number 687 June 4, 2004 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein [snip] while on Earth hydrogen might also play an important role as fuel since it has the highest chemical energy density by mass. (Tejeda et al., Physical Review Letters, 4 June 2004). Buncha crap. There is no economic way to store elemental hydrogen at more than about 40% the energy density (enthalpy of combustion/volume) of gasoline - high pressure, cryogenic, chemisorbed in HYSTOR alloy, adsorbed in porous solids or nanotubes. All crap. The absolute densest volumetric storage of hydrogen is lithium hydride, which is enormously hazardous and toxic as well as being expensive and an expensive bitch to recycle. There *is* one singular case of inexpensive, stable, relatively dense hydrogen storage - hydrocarbon fuels. Thermodynamics cannot be cheated within a heat engine. The H*Y*D*R*O*G*E*N car is even more stooopid than the E*L*E*C*T*R*I*C car - which itself was so monumentally stooopid that it didn't outlast government subsidies by even a month. [snip] |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Robert Clark" wrote in message om... While it is not economically feasible to store hydrogen as an automobile fuel *now* I wouldn't rule it out even in the short-term. Solid metallic hydrogen is close to being achieved: Hydrogen metal on the horizon. 10 April 2002 "Scientists have long expected solid hydrogen to become a metal when it is compressed, but so far electrical conductivity has only been detected in liquid hydrogen. Now an experimental study of solid hydrogen at pressures up to 320 GPa predicts that it will become metallic at a pressure of 450 GPa These are done in diamond anvil cells. Total volume is about 1 mm^3. Don't be stupid. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Michael Varney" wrote in message ...
"Robert Clark" wrote in message om... While it is not economically feasible to store hydrogen as an automobile fuel *now* I wouldn't rule it out even in the short-term. Solid metallic hydrogen is close to being achieved: Hydrogen metal on the horizon. 10 April 2002 "Scientists have long expected solid hydrogen to become a metal when it is compressed, but so far electrical conductivity has only been detected in liquid hydrogen. Now an experimental study of solid hydrogen at pressures up to 320 GPa predicts that it will become metallic at a pressure of 450 GPa These are done in diamond anvil cells. Total volume is about 1 mm^3. Don't be stupid. *Now* Bob Clark |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robert Clark wrote:
While it is not economically feasible to store hydrogen as an automobile fuel *now* I wouldn't rule it out even in the short-term. Solid metallic hydrogen is close to being achieved: Hydrogen metal on the horizon. 10 April 2002 "Scientists have long expected solid hydrogen to become a metal when it is compressed, but so far electrical conductivity has only been detected in liquid hydrogen. Now an experimental study of solid hydrogen at pressures up to 320 GPa predicts that it will become metallic at a pressure of 450 GPa - over four million times atmospheric pressure. Ren LeToullec and co-workers at the CEA in France also found that solid hydrogen becomes opaque - or 'black' - under compression (P Loubeyre et al 2002 Nature 416 613)." http://physicsweb.org/article/news/6/4/6 For this to be useful as a storage means, the hydrogen has to be stable at "reasonable" temperatures. A recent study shows solid nitrogen can be stable up to 100K: Novel nitrogen is a semiconductor. 9 May 2001 "A new form of nitrogen that behaves as a semiconductor could be a future source of energy, according to Russell Hemley and colleagues of the Carnegie Institution of Washington in the US. The group compressed nitrogen gas to create the 'non-molecular' nitrogen - an opaque solid that releases a flood of energy when it reverts to its well-known diatomic form (M Eremets et al 2001 Nature 411 170). "The team then reduced the pressure on different samples at a variety of temperatures. Remarkably, they found that the semiconducting state persisted at normal atmospheric pressure at temperatures below 100 K. A pronounced hysteresis effect arises because the change in phase lags behind the change in pressure." http://physicsweb.org/article/news/05/5/5 There are conflicting theoretical studies about whether metallic hydrogen would retain its solid form and electronic properties when the pressure was released. This study on nitrogen suggests that it could. Hey git - ignoring for a moment the intrinsic scientific obscenity of your spew, do you plan to run a million trillion diamond anvil presses 24/7 to manufacture automobile fuel? HA HA HA' What fuels the fuel-makers? -- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) "Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" The Net! |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael Varney wrote:
Show us the math... http://www.islandone.org/LEOBiblio/SPBI120.HTM Beanstalk is usually called skyhook. A short version of the skyhook is called orbital elevator: http://www.islandone.org/LEOBiblio/SPBI126.HTM Skyhook has one advantage: its cargo does not experience higher acceleration than the one produced by the Earth's gravity (g). In every other respect the skyhook is inferior to orbital slings: http://www.islandone.org/LEOBiblio/SPBI1SL.HTM http://www.islandone.org/LEOBiblio/SPBI122.HTM The orbital slings are smaller, cheaper, more immune to terrorism and meteoroids, and able to launch cargo far beyond the Earth. They will be placed in low Earth orbit where ionospheric conductivity is high enough for electrodynamic tethers, and far below the damaging radiation produced by the Van Allen belts. PS. Do not crosspost to more than 3 newsgroups. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andrew Nowicki wrote in message ...
[...] http://www.islandone.org/LEOBiblio/SPBI122.HTM The orbital slings are smaller, cheaper, more immune to terrorism and meteoroids, and able to launch cargo far beyond the Earth. They will be placed in low Earth orbit where ionospheric conductivity is high enough for electrodynamic tethers, and far below the damaging radiation produced by the Van Allen belts. But at the above URL in the ROTOVATOR section you say: High-strength plastic cannot be used because it is vulnerable to space radiation and thermal fatigue. Are you saying a rotovator that touches Earth's surface has to extend into the Van Allen belts? (not arguing just was not clear) And also at: http://www.islandone.org/LEOBiblio/SPBI1SL.HTM when talking about slings you say: Although plastics are damaged by radiation and temperature extremes of the outer space, they can be shielded by a pile of dust or rubble. So here does "outer space" mean without the protection that low Earth orbit gets? Do you think radiation levels at GEO or orbiting the moon would not let spectra-2000 tethers last for years? -- Vince |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The orbital slings are smaller, cheaper, more
immune to terrorism and meteoroids, and able to launch cargo far beyond the Earth. You can do that with a space elevator too... it doesn't just stop at geostationary orbit; you need a "counterweight" on the other end (such as an asteroid). That counterweight will be out farther than the geostationary point. Put it far enough, and you'll be above escape velocity. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Andrew Nowicki" wrote in message ... Michael Varney wrote: Show us the math... http://www.islandone.org/LEOBiblio/SPBI120.HTM I did not say regurgitate a web link. Beanstalk is usually called skyhook. A short version of the skyhook is called orbital elevator: http://www.islandone.org/LEOBiblio/SPBI126.HTM Skyhook has one advantage: its cargo does not experience higher acceleration than the one produced by the Earth's gravity (g). In every other respect the skyhook is inferior to orbital slings: http://www.islandone.org/LEOBiblio/SPBI1SL.HTM http://www.islandone.org/LEOBiblio/SPBI122.HTM The orbital slings are smaller, cheaper, more immune to terrorism and meteoroids, and able to launch cargo far beyond the Earth. They will be placed in low Earth orbit where ionospheric conductivity is high enough for electrodynamic tethers, and far below the damaging radiation produced by the Van Allen belts. PS. Do not crosspost to more than 3 newsgroups. Blow me. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob Martin wrote:
The orbital slings are smaller, cheaper, more immune to terrorism and meteoroids, and able to launch cargo far beyond the Earth. You can do that with a space elevator too... it doesn't just stop at geostationary orbit; you need a "counterweight" on the other end (such as an asteroid). That counterweight will be out farther than the geostationary point. Put it far enough, and you'll be above escape velocity. Yes, you can, but space elevators are longer than slings which accelerate cargo by the same velocity increment. The minimum length of the sling is determined by the maximum acceleration that the cargo can withstand. The acceleration equals V*V/R where V is tip velocity and R is sling's length. If you do not transport people, the sling does not have to be longer than 100 km. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Vincent Cate wrote:
High-strength plastic cannot be used because it is vulnerable to space radiation and thermal fatigue. Are you saying a rotovator that touches Earth's surface has to extend into the Van Allen belts? (not arguing just was not clear) No, it does not, but the skyhook by definition extends into the Van Allen belts. And also at: http://www.islandone.org/LEOBiblio/SPBI1SL.HTM when talking about slings you say: Although plastics are damaged by radiation and temperature extremes of the outer space, they can be shielded by a pile of dust or rubble. So here does "outer space" mean without the protection that low Earth orbit gets? Do you think radiation levels at GEO or orbiting the moon would not let spectra-2000 tethers last for years? These are the most important space tether issues that have not been answered yet. There is no doubt that deep space radiation is much less intense below the Van Allen belts than inside the belts or above the belts. Plastic parts of old solar panels are often warped, and aluminized Mylar balloon named Echo has crumbled. I guess that high temperature does more damage to plastics than space radiation. Fortunately, the temperature can be reduced by shading the tether. I hope that shaded plastic tether in low Earth orbit can survive long enough to do useful work. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 687 June 4, 2004 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein | Robert Clark | Policy | 80 | June 22nd 04 08:23 AM |
Mars Exploration Rover Update - June 2, 2004 | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 0 | June 3rd 04 05:09 PM |
Mars Global Surveyor Images - May 27 - June 2, 2004 | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 0 | June 2nd 04 07:15 PM |
PDF (Planetary Distance Formula) explains DW 2004 / Quaoar and Kuiper Belt | hermesnines | Astronomy Misc | 10 | February 27th 04 02:14 AM |
Electric Gravity&Instantaneous Light | ralph sansbury | Astronomy Misc | 8 | August 31st 03 02:53 AM |