![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is Earth In Imminent Danger From Inbound Meteors?
-http://www.bushcountry.org/news/may_...nd_meteors.htm Information On Meteors And Asteroids -http://www.rense.com/general52/ememt.htm FYI: Dom Best is talking about the latest threats from space on www.rense.com tonight. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rudolph_X wrote:
Is Earth In Imminent Danger From Inbound Meteors? -http://www.bushcountry.org/news/may_...nd_meteors.htm Information On Meteors And Asteroids -http://www.rense.com/general52/ememt.htm FYI: Dom Best is talking about the latest threats from space on www.rense.com tonight. Rudy, That's nice. Did you see the lunar eclipse the other night? Tom McDonald |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom McDonald wrote in message ...
Rudolph_X wrote: Is Earth In Imminent Danger From Inbound Meteors? -http://www.bushcountry.org/news/may_...nd_meteors.htm Information On Meteors And Asteroids -http://www.rense.com/general52/ememt.htm FYI: Dom Best is talking about the latest threats from space on www.rense.com tonight. Rudy, That's nice. Did you see the lunar eclipse the other night? Tom McDonald Rudy, Tom, This is not the first time we've heard about a celestial body about to cross our path. We all remember the Planet X debacle. However, I find it curious that a number of sources are proclaiming that earth will be besieged by comet clusters. Has anyone checked out http://www.barry.warmkessel.com ? This site has about every doomsday scenario imaginable and they all seem to point to comet clusters hitting the earth between 2006-2012. Those of you familiar with the Bible Code predictions should be aware of the 2006 date. Three strike dates are predicted by the code 2006, 2010, 2012. Have any astronomer out there heard of the phenomena of comet clusters striking earth at regular intervals? Warmkessel sets forth that argument and does it with a multitude of sources. Can anyone shed any light as to Dr. Warmkessel credentials other than what is posted on his site? What if any effects can be expected from the comets approaching earth this summer? I just hate it when weird science and prophesy come together and cause my gut to react! RT |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"RT" wrote in message
om... I just hate it when weird science and prophesy come together and cause my gut to react! Weird science and prophesy come together quite often... it would be when "real" science and prophecy come together that you might want to care. OTOH... if you consider the "bible codes" to be either "science" or "prophecy" you probably won't every have to worry... or you will be worried all the time. Either reaction is as valid as the other. Now the "Moby Dick codes" on the other hand.... g |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Paul Lawler" wrote in message hlink.net...
"RT" wrote in message om... I just hate it when weird science and prophesy come together and cause my gut to react! Weird science and prophesy come together quite often... it would be when "real" science and prophecy come together that you might want to care. OTOH... if you consider the "bible codes" to be either "science" or "prophecy" you probably won't every have to worry... or you will be worried all the time. Either reaction is as valid as the other. Now the "Moby Dick codes" on the other hand.... g Paul, There is an obsure dividing line between weird science and what others proclaim to be the real deal. Take for example the overwhelming consensus by scientists and paticularly those who frequent this new group that paranormal phenomena is a figment of one's imagination; delusional. I'm not about to try to convince any one concerning this. It's only through personal experience that the Randi's will ever "wake up". What my concern is, is that prophecy, science and the state of the world politic are now on the same page. I think we need to seriously examine the signs of the times in the wake of numerous...... let's say for now, "coincidences". Back to my original questions: Does anyone have any information concerning the original posts claim of 'Imminent Danger from Comet Clusters' and the possible effect if any of the two comets coming this summer? Also, does anyone have the scoop on Dr. Warmkessel? RT PS. Paul, by the way, I've read all the literature pro and con cocerning the Bible Code and I still cannot dismiss it. The Moby Dick, War and Peace argument does not hold water. To use the code properly your questions must use an accurate translation of the Bible and searches must be yield a CLOSE ELS pattern. You can get an ELS with almost any book. The results from the code appear to be unique in this regard. Check it out. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"RT" wrote in message
om... OTOH... if you consider the "bible codes" to be either "science" or "prophecy" you probably won't every have to worry... or you will be worried all the time. Either reaction is as valid as the other. Now the "Moby Dick codes" on the other hand.... g Paul, There is an obsure dividing line between weird science and what others proclaim to be the real deal. Take for example the overwhelming consensus by scientists and paticularly those who frequent this new group that paranormal phenomena is a figment of one's imagination; delusional. I'm not about to try to convince any one concerning this. It's only through personal experience that the Randi's will ever "wake up". What my concern is, is that prophecy, science and the state of the world politic are now on the same page. I think we need to seriously examine the signs of the times in the wake of numerous...... let's say for now, "coincidences". *sigh* And it is only through reliable double blind experimental observation (or non-observation as the case may be) of paranormal phenomena that you will ever "wise up." Again, please don't say "science" when you mean weird or pseudo science. If it is not fasifiable and/or cannot pass a double blind study it is NOT science. So that leaves you with only a confluence of "prophecy" (although you do not state whos prophecies you like) and the state of the world politic. Pretty shakey ground on which to base any life decisions, IMHO. Paul, by the way, I've read all the literature pro and con cocerning the Bible Code and I still cannot dismiss it. The Moby Dick, War and Peace argument does not hold water. To use the code properly your questions must use an accurate translation of the Bible and searches must be yield a CLOSE ELS pattern. You can get an ELS with almost any book. The results from the code appear to be unique in this regard. Check it out. Accurate according to whom? g |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
(Avi Norowitz) wrote in message . com...
(RT) wrote in message . com... PS. Paul, by the way, I've read all the literature pro and con cocerning the Bible Code and I still cannot dismiss it. The Moby Dick, War and Peace argument does not hold water. To use the code properly your questions must use an accurate translation of the Bible and searches must be yield a CLOSE ELS pattern. You can get an ELS with almost any book. The results from the code appear to be unique in this regard. Check it out. In what sense are codes in the Bible more of a "CLOSE ELS pattern" than codes in War and Peace? Are the ELS's in the September 11th attack predicted in War and Peace not close enough to each other? http://cs.anu.edu.au/~bdm/dilugim/drosninII.html Avi, My work with the code has given up mixed results when trying to duplicate Drosnin's predictions. I feel my lack of proficiency in Hebrew a major obstacle. I'm currently at an impasse with the code and have researched other sources that at least know the language. The arguments pro and con concerning it's validity already fill volumes. The serious researcher will have to sort through a lot of b.s before they reach a conclusion. However, one of my successes with the code had to do with the 2006 date and Comet. My concern is that the same numbers keep coming up: 2006, 2010, 2012. Maybe I should run the 2006 /Comet code on Moby Dick ! Anyone have an original copy? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Paul Lawler" wrote in message hlink.net...
"RT" wrote in message om... OTOH... if you consider the "bible codes" to be either "science" or "prophecy" you probably won't every have to worry... or you will be worried all the time. Either reaction is as valid as the other. Now the "Moby Dick codes" on the other hand.... g Paul, There is an obsure dividing line between weird science and what others proclaim to be the real deal. Take for example the overwhelming consensus by scientists and paticularly those who frequent this new group that paranormal phenomena is a figment of one's imagination; delusional. I'm not about to try to convince any one concerning this. It's only through personal experience that the Randi's will ever "wake up". What my concern is, is that prophecy, science and the state of the world politic are now on the same page. I think we need to seriously examine the signs of the times in the wake of numerous...... let's say for now, "coincidences". *sigh* And it is only through reliable double blind experimental observation (or non-observation as the case may be) of paranormal phenomena that you will ever "wise up." Again, please don't say "science" when you mean weird or pseudo science. If it is not fasifiable and/or cannot pass a double blind study it is NOT science. So that leaves you with only a confluence of "prophecy" (although you do not state whos prophecies you like) and the state of the world politic. Pretty shakey ground on which to base any life decisions, IMHO. Paul, by the way, I've read all the literature pro and con cocerning the Bible Code and I still cannot dismiss it. The Moby Dick, War and Peace argument does not hold water. To use the code properly your questions must use an accurate translation of the Bible and searches must be yield a CLOSE ELS pattern. You can get an ELS with almost any book. The results from the code appear to be unique in this regard. Check it out. Accurate according to whom? g Paul, It is not my intention to debate anyone concerning the validity of paranormal phenomena. This as I mentioned before can only be verified through personal experience. I find it amusing how easy, members of this news group dismiss the paranormal. Some of you need to re-examine your motives as well as the myriad amount of documentation out there. There is a reason they call it metaphysics. It's because the phenomena cannot be explained by the physics, at least not yet. Personally, I have been fortunate to have experienced a number of paranormal events that have left me without doubt that something is bleeding through into this dimension from the ‘other side'. When you have one of those undeniable experiences you'll have no need for a "double blind". Until that happens, we'll reserve talk on the subject. As far as what prophecies I portend..... they are numerous, and are endemic to world culture and religion. Once again, it's not my intention to debate prophecy. I'll let Min do that, even though his message is more to inflame than to enlighten. As for the world politic........... You do have cable? Read the newspaper? Any novice of ancient prophecy knows that as of now, every thing is in place for the fulfillment of those prophecies stated in the Bible as well as those stated by other ancient cultures and religions including the American Indian. It's in the news every day. I would contend that it is pretty shaky ground to ignore the signs of the time. Back to the original thought.... Does any one in this news group have additional information pertaining to Rudy's original post? Based on accumulated statistics, are we now experiencing an unusual amount of in coining celestial traffic i.e., meteors, asteroids, comets? And, what if any impact will the comets of the summer have on our atmosphere. All insider information welcome. RT PS. Concerning the Biblecode. By accurate translation, I am talking about the accuracy of the Torah, as written in Hebrew. Not the translated texts. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"RT" wrote in message
om... Paul, It is not my intention to debate anyone concerning the validity of paranormal phenomena. This as I mentioned before can only be verified through personal experience. I find it amusing how easy, members of this news group dismiss the paranormal. Some of you need to re-examine your motives as well as the myriad amount of documentation out there. There is a reason they call it metaphysics. It's because the phenomena cannot be explained by the physics, at least not yet. Personally, I have been fortunate to have experienced a number of paranormal events that have left me without doubt that something is bleeding through into this dimension from the 'other side'. When you have one of those undeniable experiences you'll have no need for a "double blind". Until that happens, we'll reserve talk on the subject. No, I'm sorry... but that is not valid. Personal "experience" (othewise known as anecdotal evidence) can come through many other channels, including the mind and one's own desires, fears, phobias, etc. They are NOT acceptable as "proof" or verification of the paranormal or metaphysical (or ET's for that matter). I am not denying that the paranormal exists, I am just denying that personal experience is acceptable as verification or "proof" that the paranormal exists. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Space Calendar - April 30, 2004 | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 0 | April 30th 04 03:55 PM |
Space Calendar - March 26, 2004 | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 0 | March 26th 04 04:05 PM |
Space Calendar - February 27, 2004 | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 1 | February 27th 04 07:18 PM |
Space Calendar - January 27, 2004 | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 7 | January 29th 04 09:29 PM |
Space Calendar - November 26, 2003 | Ron Baalke | Astronomy Misc | 1 | November 28th 03 09:21 AM |