Einstein's horde do spread knowledge, Stealing and publishing

Einstein's horde do spread knowledge, Stealing and publishing.

whether it's their own or their stolen one.
Many years before Einstein, other scientists had published
equally equations for E=mc^2,
amongst whom we Nikolay Umov 1873, Preston in 1875,
Poincar in 1900, Olinto De Pretto in 1903, Hasen hrl in 1904.
In the greater scheme of thing kikes do perform a very
valuable service!
Stealing and publishing!

On 23 يناير, 06:03, Hana wrote:
Â*Einstein's horde do spread knowledge, Stealing and publishing.

whether it's their own or their stolen one.
Many years before Einstein, other scientists had published
equally equations for E=mc^2,
amongst whom we Â*Nikolay Umov 1873, Â*Preston in 1875,
Poincar Â*in 1900, Olinto De Pretto in 1903, Hasen hrl in 1904.
In the greater scheme of thing kikes do perform a very
Â*valuable service!
Stealing and publishing!

..
..
..


Stealing and publishing! Stealing and publishing! Stealing and
publishing!

It is the thievery, or it is the plagiary of plagiarism?
I don’t know exactly!!!
Please… Please… Please…. Tell me… Please..

On 23 يناير, 07:25, The World wrote:
On 23 يناير, 06:03, Hana wrote:

Â*Einstein's horde do spread knowledge, Stealing and publishing.

whether it's their own or their stolen one.
Many years before Einstein, other scientists had published
equally equations for E=mc^2,
amongst whom we Â*Nikolay Umov 1873, Â*Preston in 1875,
Poincar Â*in 1900, Olinto De Pretto in 1903, Hasen hrl in 1904.
In the greater scheme of thing kikes do perform a very
Â*valuable service!
Stealing and publishing!

.
.
.

Stealing and publishing! Stealing and publishing! Stealing and
publishing!

Â*It is the thievery, or it is the plagiary of plagiarism?
I don’t know exactly!!!
Â*Please… Please… Please…. Tell me… Please..

_________________
The proof was given by Einstein himself
when he confessed to his theft of E = mc^2 in 1907
when Einstein said , that:
the issue has already been solved by other authors.


( Einstein, in 1907, under academic & public pressure

confessed, and spelled out his views on plagiarism:

Said Albert Einstein: "It appears to me, that even if

the issue has already been solved by other authors,

then despite that fact, since the issues of concern are

here addressed from a new point of view, I am entitled

to leave out a thoroughly pedantic survey of the literature )

On 23 يناير, 15:59, Blissfull wrote:
On 23 يناير, 07:25, The World wrote:





On 23 يناير, 06:03, Hana wrote:

Â*Einstein's horde do spread knowledge, Stealing and publishing.

whether it's their own or their stolen one.
Many years before Einstein, other scientists had published
equally equations for E=mc^2,
amongst whom we Â*Nikolay Umov 1873, Â*Preston in 1875,
Poincar Â*in 1900, Olinto De Pretto in 1903, Hasen hrl in 1904.
In the greater scheme of thing kikes do perform a very
Â*valuable service!
Stealing and publishing!

.
.
.

Stealing and publishing! Stealing and publishing! Stealing and
publishing!

Â*It is the thievery, or it is the plagiary of plagiarism?
I don’t know exactly!!!
Â*Please… Please… Please…. Tell me… Please..

_________________
The Â*proof was given by Einstein himself
when he confessed to his theft of E = mc^2 Â*in 1907
when Einstein said , that:
the issue has already been solved by other authors.

( Einstein, in 1907, under academic & public pressure

Â*confessed, and spelled out his views on plagiarism:

Said Albert Einstein: "It appears to me, that even if

Â* the issue has already been solved by other authors,

Â*then despite that fact, since the issues of concern are

Â*here addressed from a new point of view, I am entitled

Â* to leave out a thoroughly pedantic survey of the literature )- إخÙ�اء النص المقتبس -

- عرض النص المقتبس -


Breaking news.. Breaking news.. Breaking news..
Einstein's horde and some supporters, always threatened any scientist
with physical harm and death, if he doesn't believe in Relativity
Cultists.
Why..Why..Why

Newton's law of gravity is mathematically identical to Kepler's laws of
planetary motion, which had been published many years before.

What Newton did was provide a simple, concise reason why Kepler's empirical
laws are true; a new way of looking at the problem. Einstein did the same
for dynamics.

Nobody goes around claiming that Newton plagiarised previous scientists when
forming his laws of gravitation.

Only cranks go round claiming that Einstein plagiarised previous scientists
when forming Special Relativity.

On Jan 26, 4:27*am, "Peter Webb"
wrote:
Newton's law of gravity is mathematically identical to Kepler's laws of
planetary motion, which had been published many years before.

What Newton did was provide a simple, concise reason why Kepler's empirical
laws are true; a new way of looking at the problem. Einstein did the same
for dynamics.


That is a statement the world has heard many times so lets discuss the
details for a change -

"That the fixed stars being at rest, the periodic times of the five
primary planets, and (whether of the sun about the earth, or) of the
earth about the sun, are in the sesquiplicate proportion of their mean
distances from the sun." Newton

So,what Newton actually did was attempt to make the calendar based Ra/
Dec framework a common denominator between observation and
modeling.You get to discuss the statement above and its bold assertion
which is not identical to Kepler's version based on orbital
comparisons -

"The proportion existing between the periodic times of any two planets
is exactly the sesquiplicate proportion of the mean distances of the
orbits, or as generally given,the squares of the periodic times are
proportional to the cubes of the mean distances." Kepler

As long as the empirical fraud continues,that part of human
interpretative skills will remain unused yet modern imaging
obliterates that junk of Newton with little effort once a reader
becomes familiar with the few principles which rely on orbital
comparisons between planets as opposed to empirical trash such as
Newton's "(whether of the sun about the earth, or) of the earth about
the sun,".

The pure greed of empiricists in making people believe that geometry
is not the language of astronomy and that is what Isaac actually tried
to do.







Nobody goes around claiming that Newton plagiarised previous scientists when
forming his laws of gravitation.

Only cranks go round claiming that Einstein plagiarised previous scientists
when forming Special Relativity.